Cal @ Clemson Game Thread - The road gets tougher

3,790 Views | 81 Replies | Last: 19 days ago by HearstMining
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This one's a challenge, but maybe they get an early lead and hold it this time. On D it looks like we need to focus on Schieffelin and Hunter, shut them down before they gain any momentum.
A few notes from Clemson's media guide:
- Clemson and California have met twice in its series history before meeting as ACC rivals. The Tigers are 1-1 all-time against California, including a neutral site game in the NIT Championship game in 1999 a Clemson loss. Clemson defeated California in the 2022 Emerald Coast Classic.
- Ian Schieffelin is averaging 13.1 points and 11.1 rebounds, while adding 3.0 assists per game. One of three players nationally to average that line. He earned ACC Player of the Week and Oscar Robertson National Player of the Week for his performances during the week of Dec. 9.
- Schieffelin totaled a career-best 20 rebounds in Clemson's win over Kentucky (Dec. 3). It was the most rebounds in a game for a Tiger since Harold Jamison collected 20 on March 4, 1999 against Florida State. Schieffelin added 11 points and four assists in addition to 20 rebounds in the win over Kentucky. He is the only men's division I player in the last 25 years to put up 10+ points, 20+ rebounds and 4+ assists in a win against an AP Top 5 opponent.
- Chase Hunter is one of just five players nationally to average at least 17.0 points and produce a shooting line of at least .480/.420/.850.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess Cal deserves to have a few media notes, too. Offense seems like something that works for us… defense is another story.
1. Andrej Stojakovic has emerged as one of the top offensive threats in the ACC in his first season as a Golden Bear, ranking third in the conference with 19.1 points per game. The sophomore guard is averaging 22.0 PPG in ACC competition so far with 25 points against Stanford on Dec. 7 and 19 at Pitt on Wednesday. Stojakovic does much more than score for the Bears, as he leads the team in blocks (1.3 BPG) and is third in rebounds (4.7 RPG) he's also the only player in the country averaging at least 19.1 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 1.6 assists per game and 1.3 blocks per game. He's made dramatic improvements since transferring to Cal from rival Stanford, particularly in scoring (7.8 to 19.1 PPG), rebounding (3.4 to 4.7 RPG), blocks (0.1 to 1.3 BPG) and shooting splits (.409/.327/.528 to .440/.358/.833).

2. Freshman Jeremiah Wilkinson is making the most of his early opportunities in Cal's rotation, averaging 17.1 PPG with eight double-figure scoring efforts in the past nine games. Wilkinson, who scored 24 at Pitt on Wednesday, ranks fourth among ACC freshmen with 12.7 PPG on the season while averaging the fewest minutes played per game (20.7) of the five ACC rookies who are averaging double-figure points. The Powder Springs, Georgia, native is shooting 57.4% on 2-point attempts and can catch fire from deep with multiple 3-point makes in six games (33.9 3FG%).

Interesting attendance history numbers…

YEAR-BY-YEAR NUMBERS IN HAAS PAVILION
Season W-L Pct. Attendance Avg.
1999-2000 11-7 .611 192,730 10,707
2000-01 14-3 .823 174,653 10,273
2001-02 17-1 .944 172,198 10,094
2002-03 13-1 .928 146,625 10,473
2003-04 11-4 .733 162,585 10,839
2004-05 8-9 .470 147,373 8,735
2005-06 12-3 .800 135,743 9,324
2006-07 8-7 .533 118,712 8,443
2007-08 11-8 .578 150,383 7,915
2008-09 16-2 .888 155,233 8,624
2009-10 15-1 .937 150,773 9,423
2010-11 12-6 .667 142,071 7,893
2011-12 17-1 .944 153,571 8,532
2012-13 11-5 .687 132,757 8,297
2013-14 15-4 .789 147,318 7,754
2014-15 11-7 .611 145,775 8,099
2015-16 18-0 1.000 183,293 10,183
2016-17 15-4 .789 169,298 8,910
2017-18 5-12 .294 125,386 7,376
2018-19 7-9 .437 90,036 5,627
2019-20 12-5 .705 83,996 4,941
2020-21 6-8 .428 *0 *0
2021-22 10-8 .555 85,430 4,746
2022-23 3-14 .176 36,639 2,155
2023-24 10-6 .625 73,055 4,566
2024-25 6-2 .750 25,066 3,581

Totals
26 seasons 294-137 .682 3,300,699 7,597

barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watching Duke demolish SMU (11-2) at SMU. I was looking forward to seeing blueblood players at Haas when the Blue Devils arrive next year (?), but maybe I shouldn't.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

I guess Cal deserves to have a few media notes, too. Offense seems like something that works for us… defense is another story.
1. Andrej Stojakovic has emerged as one of the top offensive threats in the ACC in his first season as a Golden Bear, ranking third in the conference with 19.1 points per game. The sophomore guard is averaging 22.0 PPG in ACC competition so far with 25 points against Stanford on Dec. 7 and 19 at Pitt on Wednesday. Stojakovic does much more than score for the Bears, as he leads the team in blocks (1.3 BPG) and is third in rebounds (4.7 RPG) he's also the only player in the country averaging at least 19.1 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 1.6 assists per game and 1.3 blocks per game. He's made dramatic improvements since transferring to Cal from rival Stanford, particularly in scoring (7.8 to 19.1 PPG), rebounding (3.4 to 4.7 RPG), blocks (0.1 to 1.3 BPG) and shooting splits (.409/.327/.528 to .440/.358/.833).

2. Freshman Jeremiah Wilkinson is making the most of his early opportunities in Cal's rotation, averaging 17.1 PPG with eight double-figure scoring efforts in the past nine games. Wilkinson, who scored 24 at Pitt on Wednesday, ranks fourth among ACC freshmen with 12.7 PPG on the season while averaging the fewest minutes played per game (20.7) of the five ACC rookies who are averaging double-figure points. The Powder Springs, Georgia, native is shooting 57.4% on 2-point attempts and can catch fire from deep with multiple 3-point makes in six games (33.9 3FG%).

Interesting attendance history numbers…

YEAR-BY-YEAR NUMBERS IN HAAS PAVILION
Season W-L Pct. Attendance Avg.
1999-2000 11-7 .611 192,730 10,707
2000-01 14-3 .823 174,653 10,273
2001-02 17-1 .944 172,198 10,094
2002-03 13-1 .928 146,625 10,473
2003-04 11-4 .733 162,585 10,839
2004-05 8-9 .470 147,373 8,735
2005-06 12-3 .800 135,743 9,324
2006-07 8-7 .533 118,712 8,443
2007-08 11-8 .578 150,383 7,915
2008-09 16-2 .888 155,233 8,624
2009-10 15-1 .937 150,773 9,423
2010-11 12-6 .667 142,071 7,893
2011-12 17-1 .944 153,571 8,532
2012-13 11-5 .687 132,757 8,297
2013-14 15-4 .789 147,318 7,754
2014-15 11-7 .611 145,775 8,099
2015-16 18-0 1.000 183,293 10,183
2016-17 15-4 .789 169,298 8,910
2017-18 5-12 .294 125,386 7,376
2018-19 7-9 .437 90,036 5,627
2019-20 12-5 .705 83,996 4,941
2020-21 6-8 .428 *0 *0
2021-22 10-8 .555 85,430 4,746
2022-23 3-14 .176 36,639 2,155
2023-24 10-6 .625 73,055 4,566
2024-25 6-2 .750 25,066 3,581

Totals
26 seasons 294-137 .682 3,300,699 7,597
our attendance should get a bump with conference play, but we need to win some to keep fan interest

team deserves our support
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My Game thread title was going to be:

Lions* & Tigers vs Bears, oh my!



*….and the the thread title included a Goff shoutout for his duel of the 14 win, Mad Bomber QB teams tomorrow but, alas, you f@ucked me with your premature ejaculation game thread post.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right back at ya, bearister. I didn't know game threads were so important to you, but now that I do I cede the field next Wed. against Virginia. Wouldn't want someone of your advanced age blowing a gasket unnecessarily!
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looking for Clemson weaknesses in the KenPom stats… not many, but here are the Four Factors for both teams:
Numbers not in ()s are %s, numbers inside ()s are how that number ranks nationally, while on Off and on Def
: * numbers are D1 avg

Clemson (30th overall rankings)

Four Factors
Effective FG%: 52.9 (101) - 49.3 (128) *50.7
Turnover %: 15.6 (65) - 21.7 (32) *17.7
Off. Reb. %: 34.0 (66) - 29.5 (169) *30.0
FTA/FGA: 30.6 (240) - 28.2 (80) *33.3

Cal (ranks 131 overall)
Four Factors
Effective FG%: 52.3 (123) - 53.4 (271) *50.7
Turnover %: 19.1 (275) - 16.7 (227) *17.7
Off. Reb. %: 37.(223) - 29.2 (152) *30.0
FTA/FGA: 41.9 (27) - 35.0 (222) * 33.3

What do we learn from this number soup? Cal is good at getting to the line. Clemson is not at all. Let's start there, coaching staff.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't remember the last time I started one. As George Harrison said to Eric Clapton when he caught him with his wife, Pattie Boyd, "Keep her, she's all yours."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

Looking for Clemson weaknesses in the KenPom stats… not many, but here are the Four Factors for both teams:
Numbers not in ()s are %s, numbers inside ()s are how that number ranks nationally, while on Off and on Def
: * numbers are D1 avg

Clemson (30th overall rankings)

Four Factors
Effective FG%: 52.9 (101) - 49.3 (128) *50.7
Turnover %: 15.6 (65) - 21.7 (32) *17.7
Off. Reb. %: 34.0 (66) - 29.5 (169) *30.0
FTA/FGA: 30.6 (240) - 28.2 (80) *33.3

Cal (ranks 131 overall)
Four Factors
Effective FG%: 52.3 (123) - 53.4 (271) *50.7
Turnover %: 19.1 (275) - 16.7 (227) *17.7
Off. Reb. %: 37.(223) - 29.2 (152) *30.0
FTA/FGA: 41.9 (27) - 35.0 (222) * 33.3

What do we learn from this number soup? Cal is good at getting to the line. Clemson is not at all. Let's start there, coaching staff.
barsad, thx for the data ... I also subscribe to Kenpom and am amazed at all the stats ... but it takes quite a long time to figure out what stat is important. The 4 Factors seem to be what Kenpom things is important, but besides the effective FG stat and turnovers I don't quite understand why those are so important.

These stats are from kenpom:

barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those Mady stats are a lot higher than most people on BI have been giving him credit for.
I think Pomeroy picked offensive boards because they create scoring opps and limit second chances for an opponent, while free throws plus FG attempts is a measure of aggressiveness (i.e. you take it to the hoop or battle for rebounds, you get fouled more than avg). If anyone knows the keys to winning in college hoops it's KenPom, but it has never helped my March Madness bracket!
GO BEARS!
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least Pitt crushed 'Furd, too, makes me feel better about the L. Tipoff at 5:40 for Cal
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Let's make this like the 1991 Citrus Bowl and give Clemson a beat down they'll never forget. Go Bears!
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can someone explain why Wilkinson is not starting in place of Blacksher? That last bank shot by Blacksher said it all.
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great pass by Wilkinson and Dort blows the wide open layup. Why didn't he just dunk it?
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

Can someone explain why Wilkinson is not starting in place of Blacksher? That last bank shot by Blacksher said it all.
Unexplainable. Blacksher is hurting us right now. He shouldn't play more than 5 minutes.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8995 said:

Great pass by Wilkinson and Dort blows the wide open layup. Why didn't he just dunk it?


Dort aborts.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, Tucker isn't doing much.
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you flubbed an uncontested bunny, I'm predicting the jump hook misses.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dort had a rough few minutes both offensively and defensively. Hopefully he picks it up the next time he plays.
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clemson is 6 for 8 on threes.
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
High pick and roll defense is still problematic. At least we are trying to change how we defend it. Problem is, the rotation on the 2nd pass is too slow and our communication isn't good as we have had 2 guys running at one guy.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know if blackshear simply isn't very good or what's going on. But since his injury, he's been completely ineffective.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tigers are shooting 65% from floor, 75% from arc and blasting us in most stat categories except turnovers and points in the paint. …and we still in it!
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

One stat that would appear to be worthy of mention is that Clemson must lead the ACC -- if not the nation -- in ugly-ass looking players. That #4 Shfflnfln, whatever, looks like Porky Pig. And don't get me started on that guy from Air Force. And their cheerleaders aren't very hot either.
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


One stat that would appear to be worthy of mention is that Clemson must lead the ACC -- if not the nation -- in ugly-ass looking players. That #4 Shfflnfln, whatever, looks like Porky Pig. And don't get me started on that guy from Air Force. And their cheerleaders aren't very hot either.
Gosh, don't hold back.
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
Basketball Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blackshear just dribbling to much
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

I don't know if blackshear simply isn't very good or what's going on. But since his injury, he's been completely ineffective.
His confidence is definitely down. You can just see it. I think the competition has stepped up and due to his size, he isn't getting the looks like he did in the first few games. He isn't overly quick for his size and he doesn't move off ball (he literally stands in one place with his hands out calling for the ball).
Dort is also playing poorly right now.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was a helluva shot to end the half.
calgldnbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a shot by Stoja….

Go Bears!!!
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


One stat that would appear to be worthy of mention is that Clemson must lead the ACC -- if not the nation -- in ugly-ass looking players. That #4 Shfflnfln, whatever, looks like Porky Pig. And don't get me started on that guy from Air Force. And their cheerleaders aren't very hot either.



Lol ngl I was thinking the exact same thing.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ordinarily when the other team shoots 7-11 from three and you're only down 3 at the half, you're in pretty good shape. But with our D? Dunno.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tigers shooting 63% from the arc (7 treys) and they only have a 3 point lead. If we can keep up our dominance in the paint and they cool off from the arc, we may upset them.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know this may sound oversimplified. But in the second half we'll be better off the more Wilkinson and Campbell is our backcourt.
calbearinamaze
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

I know this may sound oversimplified. But in the second half we'll be better off the more Wilkinson and Campbell is our backcourt.
We'd have no "true" PG, but what the hell.
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The announcers 'taint bad.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.