2025-26 Roster Standing Thread

12,623 Views | 121 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by BearlyCareAnymore
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just wanted to keep an easily accessible list that gets updated. Please submit adds below but we can keep the portal chatter to the main Portal thread.
Updated 5/1/25

Cal Bears Roster 2025-26
13 spots filled, 2 to be filled.

1. Chris Bell, 6-7/192 F
2. John Camden, 6-8/220 PF
3. Sammie Yeanay, 6-8/240 PF
4. Justin Pippen, 6-3/180 PG
5. Nolan Dorsey, 6-6/180 SG
6. Milos Ilic, 6-10/235 PF
7. Dai Dai Ames, 6-1/160 PG
8. Semetri Carr, 6-0/160 PG
9. Jovani Ruff, 6-5/190 SG
10. DeJuan (DJ) Campbell 6-2/205 SG
11. Rytis Petraitis 6-7/210 F
12. Vladimir Pavlovic 6-3/200 PG
13. Lee Dort 6-10/245 C
14. TBD
15. TBD

Committed Portal Transfers (#) = number of years eligibility after a year at Cal

Chris Bell, 6-7/192 (0)
From Syracuse
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4684627/chris-bell

John Camden, 6-8/220 (0)
From Delaware
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4684155/john-camden

Sammie Yeanay, 6-8/240 PF (3)
From Grand Canyon University
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/5061606/sammie-yeanay

Justin Pippen, 6-3/180 PG (2)
From University of Michigan
https://mgoblue.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/justin-pippen/25721

Nolan Dorsey, 6-6/180 SG (0)
From Campbell University
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4703253/nolan-dorsey

Milos Ilic, 6-10/235 PF (0)
From Loyola Maryland
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4897890/milos-ilic

Dai Dai Ames, 6-1/160 PG (1)
From UVA
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/_/id/4845373/dai-dai-ames

High School Recruit Commits

Semetri Carr, 6-0/160 PG
Ross, CA
https://www.maxpreps.com/ca/larkspur/redwood-giants/athletes/semetri-carr/?careerid=lsi04v4om60m6

Jovani Ruff, 6-5/190 SG
Long Beach, CA
https://www.maxpreps.com/ca/long-beach/long-beach-poly-jackrabbits/athletes/jovani-ruff/?careerid=m93p2r07kk9sc

In Portal or Already Committed Elsewhere
Spencer Mahoney (Committed to Temple)
Devin Curtis
Andrej Stojakovic (Committed to Illinois)
Jeremiah Wilkinson (Committed to Georgia)
Joshua Ola-Joseph (Committed to Loyola)
BJ Omot (Committed to Minnesota)
Stephon Marbury II
Gus Larson (Committed to Queens University for grad year)
Christian Tucker
Hugh Vandeweghe

Scholarship players still on roster from last year… as far as we know
3 DeJuan (DJ) Campbell
31 Rytis Petraitis F
33 Vladimir Pavlovic G
34 Lee Dort F

Walk-ons
14 Jack McCloskey G
15 Kevin Armstrong II G
17 Jaden Goodall F
32 Jayden Karapetian G
55 BJ Fisher. G

YouTube highlights





Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree, I'll separate them, but can you confirm these are the scholarship guys and I haven't missed one
2 Andrej Stojakovic G
3 DeJuan (DJ) Campbell G
7 Spencer Mahoney F
13 Devin Curtis F
31 Rytis Petraitis F
33 Vladimir Pavlovic G
34 Lee Dort F
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Current projected starters (reasonable people can disagree)
Ruff
Ames
Ilic
Stojakovic
Petraitis
MiZery
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?
Ccajon2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.


Agree, thanks It gives me a headache just to look at all these players in their ratings and their nil value I like the o n e site, though. 4-12: Some great pickups. I think Sammy Y will explode into a second team ACC. Stoli too. Ruff ACC frosh of the year.


Current projected Atlantic Coast conference wins next year:


Despite all that and it's positive as I can be the ACC sched=brutal.

Still with what we had and what we picked up plus the coach in his third year= 10 wins (conference)
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ccajon2 said:

Big C said:


Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.


Agree, thanks It gives me a headache just to look at all these players in their ratings and their nil value I like the o n e site, though

Current projected Atlantic Coast conference wins next year:

0---2---4---6---8---10---12---14---16---18---20
*
3 wins


Can't we win at least a couple more than last season? I mean, please?
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Ccajon2 said:

Big C said:


Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.


Agree, thanks It gives me a headache just to look at all these players in their ratings and their nil value I like the o n e site, though

Current projected Atlantic Coast conference wins next year:

0---2---4---6---8---10---12---14---16---18---20
*
3 wins


Can't we win at least a couple more than last season? I mean, please?
$
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As an Old Blue I found this SMC solicitation for hoop season tickets in the East Bay Times today depressing. It left me asking, "Why can't this be Cal?" Instead we are memorizing new rosters each season. As a former A's fan, been there, done that.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MiZery said:

Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?

Definitely could be DJ, but he's going to have to earn it in practice. I am guessing that Ruff will scrimmage better and get open for more shots, but it's a coin flip this early.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

MiZery said:

Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?

Definitely could be DJ, but he's going to have to earn it in practice. I am guessing that Ruff will scrimmage better and get open for more shots, but it's a coin flip this early.
Ruff has a very unorthodox shot, and is built like Rodney Brown. That might be ok, but I don't expect him to be a big impact his first year. If he can provide some regular second team minutes that would be good. We first need to see his defense.
BearGreg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
HoopDreams said:

barsad said:

MiZery said:

Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?

Definitely could be DJ, but he's going to have to earn it in practice. I am guessing that Ruff will scrimmage better and get open for more shots, but it's a coin flip this early.
Ruff has a very unorthodox shot, and is built like Rodney Brown. That might be ok, but I don't expect him to be a big impact his first year. If he can provide some regular second team minutes that would be good. We first need to see his defense.
I don't think that's correct. Jovani's got a much broader build and a thicker lower body. He's a body type that will add muscle easily.

Here's him going for 51 points a couple of months ago.

stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice jump shot. And he doesn't try to dunk everything.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGreg said:

HoopDreams said:

barsad said:

MiZery said:

Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?

Definitely could be DJ, but he's going to have to earn it in practice. I am guessing that Ruff will scrimmage better and get open for more shots, but it's a coin flip this early.
Ruff has a very unorthodox shot, and is built like Rodney Brown. That might be ok, but I don't expect him to be a big impact his first year. If he can provide some regular second team minutes that would be good. We first need to see his defense.
I don't think that's correct. Jovani's got a much broader build and a thicker lower body. He's a body type that will add muscle easily.

Here's him going for 51 points a couple of months ago.
Thanks for posting. I hadn't see that before. 51 points in 3 quarters is impressive.

He does look like he's filled out in the last year.

Unless I missed it, I didn't see any shot longer than 10 feet. Looks like he has a nice mid range, but in the ACC he will need to shoot from 18+ feet. Not sure if he improved in that area from a year ago.

Hope I'm wrong and he will have a bigger first year impact compared to Rodney Brown.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

BearGreg said:

HoopDreams said:

barsad said:

MiZery said:

Not dj Campbell? Didn't he start to begin with last year ?

Definitely could be DJ, but he's going to have to earn it in practice. I am guessing that Ruff will scrimmage better and get open for more shots, but it's a coin flip this early.
Ruff has a very unorthodox shot, and is built like Rodney Brown. That might be ok, but I don't expect him to be a big impact his first year. If he can provide some regular second team minutes that would be good. We first need to see his defense.
I don't think that's correct. Jovani's got a much broader build and a thicker lower body. He's a body type that will add muscle easily.

Here's him going for 51 points a couple of months ago.
Thanks for posting. I hadn't see that before. 51 points in 3 quarters is impressive.

He does look like he's filled out in the last year.

Unless I missed it, I didn't see any shot longer than 10 feet. Looks like he has a nice mid range, but in the ACC he will need to shoot from 18+ feet. Not sure if he improved in that area from a year ago.

Hope I'm wrong and he will have a bigger first year impact compared to Rodney Brown.
Here is some video showing he can hit an outside shot. It even shows some misses. I have seen him play whole games and he can shoot at the high school level. Can't say what will happen when he gets against better competition with his unorthodox approach. I think he is very good and should be ranked as a top 50 recruit. He is more like Joe Shipp than Rodney Brown.

Brown has talent and I expected more, but he seemed not to handle the pressure well.

HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
thanks for posting the video

yes, it shows his shooting which looks pretty accurate. When I first saw his shot I compared it to LaMello Ball. Ball had a similar form and was a very good shooter. When he got to the nba he rebuilt his shot and improved a lot. It's very tough to completely rebuild your shot and if you are a good shooter it's probably not advisable in season.

And while I'm being devils advocate, a few things from watching that video:

- he played well vs a team with good talent

- Number 0, Alijah Arenas looks like the better player. That's no shame as he got a lot of High D1 offers and signed with USC, but I noticed his coach switched defenders on Arenas. Ruff started off defending him, but coach switched defenders after Arenas scored multiple times on Ruff. Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean he's not a good defender, but it is an indication.

- Ruff wasn't able to get all the way to the rack on his drives, although his mid-range jumper looks pretty good

Top 50? You've seen him a lot more than me, so I'll defer to you on that ranking, but he looks top 150 to me, which is good
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

thanks for posting the video

yes, it shows his shooting which looks pretty accurate. When I first saw his shot I compared it to LaMello Ball. Ball had a similar form and was a very good shooter. When he got to the nba he rebuilt his shot and improved a lot. It's very tough to completely rebuild your shot and if you are a good shooter it's probably not advisable in season.

And while I'm being devils advocate, a few things from watching that video:

- he played well vs a team with good talent

- Number 0, Alijah Arenas looks like the better player. That's no shame as he got a lot of High D1 offers and signed with USC, but I noticed his coach switched defenders on Arenas. Ruff started off defending him, but coach switched defenders after Arenas scored multiple times on Ruff. Of course, that doesn't necessarily mean he's not a good defender, but it is an indication.

- Ruff wasn't able to get all the way to the rack on his drives, although his mid-range jumper looks pretty good

Top 50? You've seen him a lot more than me, so I'll defer to you on that ranking, but he looks top 150 to me, which is good

Yes, Arenas is a better player. He is a top 10 player in the amazing class of '26. At the McDonald's game he did not hit every shot, but no one could stop him from getting it off. I think he will be a lottery pick.

Top 150 is not good. Top 150 is a body. I think Ruff can be a scorer at the ACC level if he can hit his shot.

I think his shot is more like Lonzo Ball than LaMelo. Lonzo has learned to shoot. Hopefully it takes Ruff less time.




Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

^ All these teams playing and Top 150 is only a "body"?

How many incoming freshman recruits in the past 7-8 years have we had that were even Top 150?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


^ All these teams playing and Top 150 is only a "body"?

How many incoming freshman recruits in the past 7-8 years have we had that were even Top 150?


Last top ranked freshman was under Jones with Matt Bradley. Fox was a disaster and chased away more talent than he brought in. Wilkerson should have been more highly ranked, but then maybe we don't land him.
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.
Reminder that once the House settlement goes into effect -- the judge held the final hearing today re giving her approval to the settlement, and will issue an order soon -- the distinction between scholarship players and walk-ons effectively goes away. Each men's hoops team will have a maximum roster of 15 players and can give (or not give) athletic scholarships to any or all of them.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

Big C said:

Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.
Reminder that once the House settlement goes into effect -- the judge held the final hearing today re giving her approval to the settlement, and will issue an order soon -- the distinction between scholarship players and walk-ons effectively goes away. Each men's hoops team will have a maximum roster of 15 players and can give (or not give) athletic scholarships to any or all of them.

That reminds me: Why did we have, like, 20+ players on the roster this season? Never seen that before and never heard the reasoning.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought Madsen said he wanted to always have plenty of fresh bodies to challenge the rotation players in practice.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

Big C said:

Great to have this! One thing: I feel like listing the walk-ons kind of muddies up the water.
Reminder that once the House settlement goes into effect -- the judge held the final hearing today re giving her approval to the settlement, and will issue an order soon -- the distinction between scholarship players and walk-ons effectively goes away. Each men's hoops team will have a maximum roster of 15 players and can give (or not give) athletic scholarships to any or all of them.

Good point… if we keep all current players listed above (minus walk-ons) we're at 12, so I hope we have three more pleasant surprises coming out of the portal.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

I thought Madsen said he wanted to always have plenty of fresh bodies to challenge the rotation players in practice.


Maybe Madsen was thinking ahead and wanted to get extra practice players admitted as preferred walkons before the House settlement roster limits went into effect? Because I am assuming schools cannot simply say they have 15 on the roster and bring in 5 more "non-roster" walkons. Any additional practice players will have to be from the general student body. Of course, that will be easier to circumvent at schools with lower admission standards.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New projected lineup, based on my assumption that Madsen promised the Pippens (father and son) a starting slot. Man do we need some more size, Ilic isn't enough.
Pippen
Ames
Ilic
Stojakovic
Petraitis
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

New projected lineup, based on my assumption that Madsen promised the Pippens (father and son) a starting slot. Man do we need some more size, Ilic isn't enough.
Pippen
Ames
Ilic
Stojakovic
Petraitis
That seems like a pretty big assumption, barsad. Just curious why?
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not rocket science, you don't leave Michigan, ranked 21st on KenPom, to come to Cal, ranked 110th, for anything except guaranteed playing time or money. The Pippens don't need money.
It's true that he or his dad could have had a falling out with Dusty May, but in that case why choose Cal vs all the other schools above us unless he knows he will be starting or at least sharing PG duties?
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adjusting projected starters to bring in Yeanay (finally some size to pair with Ilic!)
Stojakovic SG
Pippen G
Petraitis F
Yeanay F
Ilic C

I could see Petraitis losing his spot to Dorsey unless he learns how to score more consistently.
PenBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

Adjusting projected starters to bring in Yeanay (finally some size to pair with Ilic!)
Stojakovic SG
Pippen G
Petraitis F
Yeanay F
Ilic C
cc
I could see Petraitis losing his spot to Dorsey unless he learns how to score more consistently.
I see Dorsey as a smaller poor men's Petraitis but at guard. Let's see if he is quick enough to stay infront of ACC guards without fouling.
Intuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right now, supposition has the 2025-26 roster incomplete and unfinished. It is expected that the existing squad will be materially benefited through the addition of an undeclared silent commit. Speculation is that Cal in addition to the silent continues to recruit the Portal seeking the best available talent to improve the projected roster.

Is Mark Madson keeping the identity of the silent unannounced in order to minimize the possibility of adverse recruiting designed to destabilize existing, potential or targeted Cal players.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

It's not rocket science, you don't leave Michigan, ranked 21st on KenPom, to come to Cal, ranked 110th, for anything except guaranteed playing time or money. The Pippens don't need money.
It's true that he or his dad could have had a falling out with Dusty May, but in that case why choose Cal vs all the other schools above us unless he knows he will be starting or at least sharing PG duties?


Would you think this if his name weren't Pippen? Players at better schools who get no playing time are the cliche transfer portal get for us, along side players who get plenty of playing time at lower level schools. It's not about the team you come from. It's about the teams you can go to.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyCareAnymore said:

barsad said:

It's not rocket science, you don't leave Michigan, ranked 21st on KenPom, to come to Cal, ranked 110th, for anything except guaranteed playing time or money. The Pippens don't need money.
It's true that he or his dad could have had a falling out with Dusty May, but in that case why choose Cal vs all the other schools above us unless he knows he will be starting or at least sharing PG duties?


Would you think this if his name weren't Pippen? Players at better schools who get no playing time are the cliche transfer portal get for us, along side players who get plenty of playing time at lower level schools. It's not about the team you come from. It's about the teams you can go to.

No I wouldn't, like I said, if your name is Pippen (or any other NBA son) and we know you don't need the money, then it's the playing time. You're saying he had no other offers between a No. 110 and a No. 21 team… I'm saying he had offers, but Madsen made his "just between us former pro players" appeal and promised at least a very good look at starting. He rode the bench at Michigan, why would he do the same here?
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Updated projected starters, Camden's 16 points is like water in the desert.
Camden F
Yeanay F
Stojakovic SG
Pippen G or Ames
Ilic C
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Intuit said:

Right now, supposition has the 2025-26 roster incomplete and unfinished. It is expected that the existing squad will be materially benefited through the addition of an undeclared silent commit. Speculation is that Cal in addition to the silent continues to recruit the Portal seeking the best available talent to improve the projected roster.

Is Mark Madson keeping the identity of the silent unannounced in order to minimize the possibility of adverse recruiting designed to destabilize existing, potential or targeted Cal players.

Well I count 15, so your "silent commit" will have to bump someone from last year's roster off the list. If people know about anybody from last year who's in the portal but not listed above let me know.
Intuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No disrespect intended, but Cal's current 14 & 15 would be readably replaceable and only missed on game day by their loved ones.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.