Chris Bell return?

5,318 Views | 28 Replies | Last: 20 days ago by calumnus
aggiebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Any idea what he could be hinting at here??..he's used up his 4 years of eligibility, but in this day and age i don't even know what eligibility means anymore (this was a few hours ago btw, the story is now deleted)
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiebear said:


Any idea what he could be hinting at here??..he's used up his 4 years of eligibility, but in this day and age i don't even know what eligibility means anymore (this was a few hours ago btw, the story is now deleted)

Freshman: started 30 games for Syracuse
Sophomore: started 32 games for Syracuse
Junior: played in 33 games for Syracuse (started first 13)
Senior: played in 34 games for Cal, started in 33.

Yeah, unless they give 5 full years of eligibility, it isn't even close.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.ncaa.org/division-i-adopts-age-based-eligibility-model/
New rules just passed, 5 seasons of competition.
However, Chris Bell appears to be in that unfortunate first row of the table, only 4 seasons. But I'll bet there's an appeal process happening for the 25-26 seniors to sweep them into the new rules regime.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Bell is granted another year would Cal be able to offer the money and/or playing time he got last season?
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

If Bell is granted another year would Cal be able to offer the money and/or playing time he got last season?

He's a good college player. The minutes for sure, the money, I don't know.
ManBearLion123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

If Bell is granted another year would Cal be able to offer the money and/or playing time he got last season?

Perhaps the biggest weakness on next year's team looks to be shooting. So Bell would definitely get minutes.

That being said, I doubt he's granted another year...so this is probably a moot point.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMHO Bell has plenty of talent and skill but more effort on defense and rebounding would do wonders for his game.
ManBearLion123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe Bell was hoping to get a temporary injunction like these players. Shame it looks like he wasn't able to get one.

CalBearinLA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maybe this will help?

ManBearLion123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bell is HS class of 2022…

stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this holds up it will allow Bell and Campbell to play in 2026-27. I suspect we have too many guards ahead of Campbell to make him much of an offer.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bell signed a contract with a nba developmental league. Not sure how easy to get out of it
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do we have a roster spot left?
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Do we have a roster spot left?


We will find a way .
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Do we have a roster spot left?

AI says we do have 1 scholarship roster spot open.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ncaa is challenging the ruling
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://fb.watch/ILiEc8euAx/?fs=e
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Ncaa is challenging the ruling

I don't know how the NCAA wins this on a basic fairness argument, you don't arbitrarily award one set of players an extra year of earning power based on whether they were lucky enough to be born one year vs. the next. Pretty stupid way to write a rule, and I don't see Congress bailing them out either.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

oskidunker said:

Ncaa is challenging the ruling

I don't know how the NCAA wins this on a basic fairness argument, you don't arbitrarily award one set of players an extra year of earning power based on whether they were lucky enough to be born one year vs. the next. Pretty stupid way to write a rule, and I don't see Congress bailing them out either.

Why does the NCAA even care that much? It is their new rule from now on, why not have it apply now? We are only talking about a single season. Would be better if they just turned their attention to adjusting their rules to accommodate the ruling for this season, the only season it will impact.
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.

If we had a roster of "G-League at best" players we'd be making deep tournament runs.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

HearstMining said:

I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.

If we had a roster of "G-League at best" players we'd be making deep tournament runs.


I am puzzled why he is having trouble sticking with a g league team. He is tall and he can shoot from distance. Defense never seemed to be a major factor in the nba but maybe I am wrong. Something else.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

HearstMining said:

I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.

If we had a roster of "G-League at best" players we'd be making deep tournament runs.

Yup - true of essentially all college teams. Underscores the huge jump from college to the NBA.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

concernedparent said:

HearstMining said:

I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.

If we had a roster of "G-League at best" players we'd be making deep tournament runs.


I am puzzled why he is having trouble sticking with a g league team. He is tall and he can shoot from distance. Defense never seemed to be a major factor in the nba but maybe I am wrong. Something else.

He won games for us with his shooting, but his passing, rebounding and defense aren't so hot.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent said:

HearstMining said:

I like Bell, but he has "G-League at best" written all over his game. But I can't blame him for trying for another year of eligibility since NIL must be better pay than G-League.

If we had a roster of "G-League at best" players we'd be making deep tournament runs.

I like the sound of this, let's put in two G-League teams as play-in teams for March Madness. Who are we kidding, the G-League is just another "college-like" conference with 20-somethings who get paid to play basketball (and paid less than the P5 players), why not see how they match up in the tournament? I'm not so sure they would go deep, but would love to watch the games to see them try.
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The solution to the Chris Bell situation is apparent he needs to join the women's team they should be able to put him on as a walk on provide him with nil and his presence would make the Cal Women's team probably one of the top teams in the country if not the best this is in keeping with the wnbas position too so it's politically correct
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the end of it?
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/acc-becomes-fourth-final-power-204614974.html
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Is this the end of it?
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/acc-becomes-fourth-final-power-204614974.html

partly snipped (free, and well worth every nothing)..
Quote:

AARON BEARD
Thu, August 27, 2026 at 1:46 PM PDT
5 min read

It took three days for the nation's four powerful athletic conferences to dig in on banning players who were on NFL rosters from returning to college football. The hope is it offers order amid the chaos growing through legal challenges and the pursuit of loopholes to NCAA eligibility rules.
The Atlantic Coast Conference joined its peers in the Big 12, Big Ten and Southeastern Conference on Thursday by approving a ban that also covers professional athletes seeking to return to college to play men's or women's college basketball. The Big Ten and SEC implemented their plans Tuesday, while the Big 12's ruling followed Wednesday.

# gob ears
not dead yet # funk trunk and i.c.e. too (allergic to AI)
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Is this the end of it?
https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/acc-becomes-fourth-final-power-204614974.html

"It's an amateurism rule" (from the NC State coach in the article) is laughable. College players are being paid now. They have agents. Declaring for the draft is not even the same as being paid by the NFL or NBA.

It will be interesting to see if a Conference is not seen as a cartel and a prohibition against these players is not seen as a "group boycott" and a "refusal to deal." The key is that conferences don't "employ" players, individual schools do. Discovery may show communication between the conferences on this issue too.

It could have just been a one year exemption to accommodate players who chose before the new rule granting 5 years of eligibility and before the courts' ruling.

My guess is these players will not play this year as the season will start before it is decided in the courts and then they will win big judgements for their losses (with damages trebled). Stupid.

It will be interesting to see what the non-power conferences do and if any of these players go there. Especially in basketball. Is Notre Dame football bound by ACC rules?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.