PAC12 Tournament: Cal vs Colorado Game Thread

14,693 Views | 249 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by NYCGOBEARS
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good effort, boys. Good luck in the NIT.
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah f*ck... Nice try the last play but not enough.
Optimistic Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Props to the guys for battling back.. Maybe a 1seed for the NIT
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Optimistic Bear;842292345 said:

Ah man .. Cobbs had a chance


Couldn't ask for a better look. I thought it was down.
RoseBowlThirsty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, another disappointing season of Cal hoops comes to an end. I have no interest in the NIT.
UrsaMajor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Too bad; after such a great effort, Justin misses two chances to tie. Oh well.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our boys made a game of it at the end. Proud of em. Maybe I get to see them at MSG sooner than I thought.
RussBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Optimistic Bear;842292349 said:

Props to the guys for battling back.. Maybe a 1seed for the NIT


home game!!
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842292353 said:

Our boys made a game of it at the end. Proud of em. Maybe I get to see them at MSG sooner than I thought.


LOL. National 'Ship baby!
GRRAAH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bummer. . .if only that energy had been present a few more instances this season
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Optimistic Bear;842292349 said:

Props to the guys for battling back.. Maybe a 1seed for the NIT


Positives:

1. Home games and ticket revenue for the AD

2. Cal won't ruin my bracket
SigOtherIsATrojan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoseBowlThirsty;842292351 said:

Well, another disappointing season of Cal hoops comes to an end. I have no interest in the NIT.


Remember those guys in the national media who were commending MM so much when we were 5-0 in conference play. Talking about how he knows how to win with every roster and adapts to his guys. Acting like Cal was going to be a dangerous tourney team. Cal promptly went 5-9 the rest of the way. Some things never change.
AXLBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842292353 said:

Our boys made a game of it at the end. Proud of em. Maybe I get to see them at MSG sooner than I thought.

Why? They decided to not play until 10 to go in the 2nd. Another cal team not ready to play. We've seen this before.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear;842292356 said:

LOL. National 'Ship baby!


Pete Newell owned that bitch!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear;842292350 said:

Couldn't ask for a better look. I thought it was down.


Yeah, I thought is was going down.

I also thought he might have been fouled?
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No help for Cobbs. I feel bad for him.
cal2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Optimistic Bear;842292342 said:

Fouled the white guy.. We have a chance


That actually made me laugh....
BeachyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was Colorado, who will get destroyed in the next round. If we were playing a team with a pulse it would've been a 20-point loss.

Enjoy the NIT, Bears. We saw this coming ever since that USC loss, maybe earlier.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, can they gamble on the rest of the games now?
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus;842292363 said:

Yeah, I thought is was going down.

I also thought he might have been fouled?


They may have called it at Haas, but not in Vegas. Oh well, time to think about Spring Ball.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachyBear;842292366 said:

It was Colorado, who will get destroyed in the next round. If we were playing a team with a pulse it would've been a 20-point loss.

Enjoy the NIT, Bears. We saw this coming ever since that USC loss, maybe earlier.


... a bubble team all year without significant contributions from the Monsters Class.

:rollinglaugh:
goldenbearlylegal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This was just a bad year for Monty. We've seen him get more out of less, but I think he underachieved with this cast.
oskithepimp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AXLBear;842292361 said:

Why? They decided to not play until 10 to go in the 2nd. Another cal team not ready to play. We've seen this before.


Sadly that was our MO this season. Only show up sometimes. We have a lot of capable scorers, it's too bad they all never showed up at the same time.
BearlyLegal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskithepimp;842292390 said:

Sadly that was our MO this season. Only show up sometimes. We have a lot of capable scorers, it's too bad they all never showed up at the same time.

Typical slowing.
Give up too many offensive RBs. Bad Outside shooting.
Bad FR Shooting.
BearlyLegal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bad
Bad
Bad
BearlyLegal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bad rebounding
Bad outside shooting
Bad free throw shooting
Ukrainian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
goldenbearlylegal;842292384 said:

This was just a bad year for Monty. We've seen him get more out of less, but I think he underachieved with this cast.


[COLOR="Navy"][SIZE="2"]
To put this on Monty is ludicrous !! I watched every game this team played on TV this year and I never saw Montgomery shoot any bricks, miss a single free-throw, or lose the ball while dribbling into triple team defenses !!! As Ernie Kent said, "it's not the X's and O's ... it's the Jimmy's and Joe's" !!! This team, for whatever reason, never developed an identity or reinforced roles ... and continued to show indifference to the execution of fundamentals.

We lost the game by three points, yet look at the statistics for second chance points, free-throw percentage, three-point shooting percentage, turnovers, and rebounding. Losing any of those categories in a game can subject a team to losing a close game. Losing in four of five makes it a near certainty !! Most of the three balls missed by Colorado created long rebounds falling 6 to 10 feet from the rim. Solo and Kravish are down low and those balls are the responsibility of the 1, 2, and 3 positions, filling the lane and blocking out secondary rebounders.

None of our flashy freshman stepped up today. Byrd was ineffective on offense and has shown to be a general liability on defense. Singer is a solid ball handler but has not developed any confidence in his offensive game. I am shocked that for a 36 point-a-game guy in high school, he doesn't shoot the jumper with more confidence or consistency. His shots from long range are too flat and often skim the front rim, clanking off the back rim. (The higher the arc, the larger the rim becomes) Byrd is a "tweener" ... Too short to handle a taller 3 and unable to create his own shot against taller, faster competition than he faced in high school. Don't get me wrong, he has a tremendous upside, but he has a lot of work to accomplish during the off-season. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I think they really missed the length and bulk Rooks in the paint on defense.

If you can't get up to play 40 minutes of inspired ball for an opportunity to go to the NCAA tournament, I don't see these guys getting particularly juiced up to play in the N I T. If you think you saw a lackluster effort for about 30 minutes today, just wait for the stinker they have in store for you on the first night of that "who gives a shyte" tourney they're about to play in. I don't think it's going to be pretty !!

Let the criticism of me begin. I couldn't care less. I've been a loyal Cal fan for over 60 years and to acknowledge that is to reveal that you been through more than your share of disappointing seasons, so fire away.
[/SIZE][/COLOR]

:Monty :bluecarrot:
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dude, turn off the BOLD.
goldenbearlylegal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ukrainian;842292431 said:

[COLOR="Navy"][SIZE="2"]
To put this on Monty is ludicrous !!
[/SIZE][/COLOR]

:Monty :bluecarrot:


How so? Monty gets paid (a lot) based on results, which includes among other things properly motivating the team. I don't think calling out players is fair (however true) because that's Monty's job. It's his job to get them to execute his plan for winning. That's what coaching is. There's plenty of blame to go around but Monty is ultimately accountable, as it should be. I don't see how you can make an argument that he had a good year as a coach but couldn't get his players to listen. Now that's ludicrous!
RussBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
goldenbearlylegal;842292453 said:

How so? Monty gets paid (a lot) based on results, which includes among other things properly motivating the team. I don't think calling out players is fair (however true) because that's Monty's job. It's his job to get them to execute his plan for winning. That's what coaching is. There's plenty of blame to go around but Monty is ultimately accountable, as it should be. I don't see how you can make an argument that he had a good year as a coach but couldn't get his players to listen. Now that's ludicrous!


what you say is true, but there really isnt much monty can do about brick city. there have been some just god awful shots thrown up of late -- airball wide open threes. monty can't shoot the ball for these guys.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beelzebear;842292434 said:

Dude, turn off the BOLD.


Yeah, otherwise, pretty accurate.

:cry:
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[SIZE="7"]Ben Braun wins that game.[/SIZE]
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister;842292482 said:

[SIZE="7"]Ben Braun wins that game.[/SIZE]


:rollinglaugh:
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beelzebear;842292434 said:

Dude, turn off the BOLD.


Hasn't "dude" become more yesterday than bold, almost?
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66;842292487 said:

Hasn't "dude" become more yesterday than bold, almost?


Dude abides.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.