socaltownie;842297336 said:
Well lets hope the monster class changes which shockster believes in change this trend.
TO be fair, though, I thought we played much better in the zone - and I think it wasn't necessarily on the defensive end....rather it allowed the guys to force some turnovers - 7 steals last night and many of them "out top" so we could run off them - which allowed our wings to do what they currently do pretty well - score in space and on the move. It would have been interesting to see us play more 2-3 earlier this year and learn how to rebound better out of it - 17 O boards was truly the killer.
With Solomon instead of Kreklow/Behrens down low we would rebound much better, even in the 3-2.
I have thought all along that this group of players was really well suited to zone. Moreover, I thought we proved it last year in our end of the season run that came when we switched to zone. The idea that freshmen cannot learn zone is preposterous. They played well in it the few times we went to it this year with only a few days of preparation. Furtermore, I have seen 8 year olds play good zone. Freshman football players have to learn MUCH more complicated plays and schemes. Shoot, freshman basketball players have to learn much more complicated plays on offense than the responsibilities (which are pretty obvious and intuitive) in a zone entail.
I do think/hope that these past two games should/will be the model for how we play next year.