why not Brian Scalabrine

4,042 Views | 38 Replies | Last: 11 yr ago by HoopDreams
kgun98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoBears58;842299688 said:

Doc Rivers thought enough of him to keep him around.

Doc Rivers > Jackson


That ridiculous guaranteed contract for 15 mil kept him around, not Doc. If Rivers thought so highly of Scalabrine why didn't he play him over Leon Powe in the 2008 playoffs? I agree that Doc is the better coach; that is why he played Powe over Scalabrine whose only contribution as a player was to block the huddle. Besides, your analogy doesn't work. Doc coached him, while he served as an assistant to Jackson; apples to oranges. He might turn into a decent coach someday but now is not the time to take a risk on someone so unproven. Besides, he's a trojan!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister;842299816 said:

Racist against giant paisano gingers. That must place me in a fairly select club. Is there a secret handshake or ritual of some sort?


Giant paisano ginger [U]condoms.[/U]

You are not alone.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus;842300132 said:

Giant paisano ginger [U]condoms.[/U]

You are not alone.


barabbas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoBears58;842299344 said:

He played for over 10 years in the NBA and was admired by many in the Warriors organization...


A better question would be; why Brian Scalabrine?
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
my projection is the team wins more conference games next year than this year, and then look out

school is in LA, low admission standards, easy to stay in school, has a new stadium, lots of money, and recruits will like "dunk city"

usc has been right there a number of times, but every time their about to break out, something happens and they fall back

maybe not this time


tsubamoto2001;842299557 said:

Enfield was indeed a one-hit wonder, but he would have likely taken this years FGCU team to the Tournament or come close to it. Also, when you're SC, basketball is not the highest priority. They've never had sustained success and what others may deem as a big risk was not a big risk for them, as they did not have much to lose. CEnfield was a hot name that brought a flashy game (uptempo style). If it works out, you do back flips. If not, it's not a huge loss. The worse thing they could have done was hire a coach that brought a boring style and had little upside for success. Enfield brings a lot of upside, especially with the recruiting base that he has.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.