stu;842843727 said:
Then it must be time to turn this thread to politics.
OK; I'll take you up on that, by defending the Monkees, whose relatively prolific output contained a lot of actually interesting music - decent quality hits; and I remember especially a song (and a really good one) that was actually in 7/8 meter (and, with the total aesthetic of which - including the lyrics and the melody, the odd meter actually made aesthetic and emotional sense - kind of expressing an intentionally uncomfortable, not terribly happy, emotion -- NB: Of course County Music does that all the time, e.g., She stomped on my heart, and she mashed that sucker, flat) - an adventurism that hasn't even now been attempted in pop music. So, from a pop culture perspective, you could say that the Stones were, culturally, more cutting edge (for white people), and the Monkees more (unapologetically) "commercial", and therefore say that, in relation to the Stones, the Monkees were "lame"; but, from a more cosmic perspective, one could say the same thing about the Stones in relation to Bo Diddly, and Howlin' Wolf, and Muddy Waters, and Robert Johnson, and Sonny Boy Williamson, and Lightnin' Hopkins, Son House, BB King, etc., etc., etc., etc.