Dyson has removed his name from the transfer portal

13,527 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by joe amos yaks
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Figures. I wonder if Fox will take him back.

https://collegesportsmaven.io/cal/api/amp/cal/basketball/cal-basketball-juhwan-harris-dyson-reportedly-will-remain-at-cal--cnecAa9I0e7z9-lYVNu5A/
Go Bears!
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know a lot of people here don't think he has skills but I still believe he has potential and look forward to having him back.

He definitely already contributes significantly on the defensive and will spend two more years at Berkeley getting bigger, stronger, and better.
Give to Cal Legends!

https://calegends.com/donation/ Do it now. Text every Cal fan you know, give them the link, tell them how much you gave, and ask them to text every Cal fan they know and do the same.
RJABear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great.

it would be great to also hear that Connor Vanover is staying.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dont agree. Fouls on defense, misses point blank layups and made one 15 foot shot all year. We will see who Fox agrees with, unless he is just looking for bodies. I was really hoping someone would take him.
Go Bears!
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Figures. I wonder if Fox will take him back.
Only if we're short of bodies. Otherwise he's not worth spending a scholarship on.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

oskidunker said:

Figures. I wonder if Fox will take him back.
Only if we're short of bodies. Otherwise he's not worth spending a scholarship on.
You think Fox would tell him to kick rocks?
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I doubt it because it might cause Vanover or Sueing to leave. Maybe try to maintain the team
Go Bears!
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JHD at least has the athleticism to be a factor. Yes, the skills need work (a lot of work). He's never really looked comfortable out there, he doesn't play with confidence. Let's see if things change under a new coach.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is big. Definitely a player I want on my team


Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Dont agree. Fouls on defense, misses point blank layups and made one 15 foot shot all year. We will see who Fox agrees with, unless he is just looking for bodies. I was really hoping someone would take him.
Last season, there seemed to be a confluence of...
a) his hand injury
b) the lousy coaching he was getting
c) yes, his lack of acquired basketball skills

Those three factors seemed to snowball and get into his head, resulting in one-end-of-the-court disaster.

If I'm Fox, I'm thinking I can coach him up.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

I know a lot of people here don't think he has skills
That's a mischaracterization. It's not that people think he has no skills. He has no skills.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi: He is actually athletic. He just can't shoot from the perimeter and he lacks a high basketball IQ. In a high-powered conference, he would be a walk-on. A good walk-on, to be sure. In practice, he actually shoots pretty well. His confidence, however, is sorely lacking, and he handicaps his team on offense.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

Yogi: He is actually athletic. He just can't shoot from the perimeter and he lacks a high basketball IQ. In a high-powered conference, he would be a walk-on. A good walk-on, to be sure. In practice, he actually shoots pretty well. His confidence, however, is sorely lacking, and he handicaps his team on offense.
He can't shoot, he misses layups, he can't dribble, and he can't pass. That pretty much covers basketball skills.

I'm not interested in a poor man's A.J. Diggs.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

Yogi: He is actually athletic. He just can't shoot from the perimeter and he lacks a high basketball IQ. In a high-powered conference, he would be a walk-on. A good walk-on, to be sure. In practice, he actually shoots pretty well. His confidence, however, is sorely lacking, and he handicaps his team on offense.


We could really use him....as a WR.
sheki
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He made those free throws vs Stanford to seal the comeback. Both, iirc as a 50% ft shooter.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember his freshman year when he won the game with a huge steal and what should have been a and-1. He then made 2 clutch pressure free throws to beat a good San Diego State team
bearchamp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People are awfully, and unreasonably harsh. He was a freshman. Some fresh are ready to play at the college level and some aren't. Other players on the team made huge improvements going into their soph year, Dyson might also.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearchamp said:

He was a freshman. Some fresh are ready to play at the college level and some aren't.
This season he was a soph. However he began his first season very ill and his next with a finger injury. I think he's a player who could improve tremendously with good health and good coaching.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

bearchamp said:

He was a freshman. Some fresh are ready to play at the college level and some aren't.
This season he was a soph. However he began his first season very ill and his next with a finger injury. I think he's a player who could improve tremendously with good health and good coaching.
I agree. I sure would like to see him be healthy and play for a whole season.
SFCityBear
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can only go by what I see. Two years and one shot beyond point blank range. Bodies? Ok. I think we could find someone better. Come back after next year and tell me how much he has improved. Yogi is spot on. Maybe Fox can work a miracle.

Ps. How can you be listed as a shooting guard when you can't shoot ?
Go Bears!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Ps. How can you be listed as a shooting guard when you can't shoot ?
In some ways, like vast unrealized potential, JHD reminds me of Marcus Lee. Maybe we'll find out if shooting can be taught.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
JHD has shown that he is athletic, and has potential, defensively at least. He may turn out to be a good player for Cal, or he may not. So far, even considering his illness and his injury, it looks like yet another case where a player is very over-rated by those who compile recruit rankings.

We may end up with Chauca/Davis types (or Kaileb Rodriguez/Khalil Johnson types), but for heaven's sake, get them through try-outs for walk-on slots, not scholarship slots on the roster. Cole Welle was better than any one of these players, and he was a walk-on. And once in a while, you get a Forehan-Kelly.
SFCityBear
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
don't forget the legendary Bak bak bak Bak . Bak Bak was very bad Bad Bad.
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001 said:

JHD at least has the athleticism to be a factor. Yes, the skills need work (a lot of work). He's never really looked comfortable out there, he doesn't play with confidence. Let's see if things change under a new coach.
He strikes me as a guy who could get a lot better with some real coaching. I don't think he's had that yet.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

don't forget the legendary Bak bak bak Bak . Bak Bak was very bad Bad Bad.
Bak was one of my favorite players. Slowest man on the roster. No talent whatever. Not aggressive. Coaching discovered he could get open and make a ten footer from the side, which he got pretty good at. Coaching turned him into a pretty good defender. Remember the Wazzu game where Cal was losing and Monty had tried everybody but the water boy on Brock Moton, one of the favorites for the POY award? Monty put Bak on Moton, and Bak shut him down completely, and the Bears won. I'll never forget it. And he won't either. He would never be anything but a bit player, but he was a good example of how someone with no skill at all could get coached up by a good coach to be able to contribute, however little, to a team.
SFCityBear
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
I hope like hell we aren't giving out scholarships just to get bodies. If we have to go shorthanded this season, so be it. I have no problem with keeping JHD though.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bluesaxe said:

PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
I hope like hell we aren't giving out scholarships just to get bodies. If we have to go shorthanded this season, so be it. I have no problem with keeping JHD though.
This is where Fox, if he doesn't know it already, could use a little recent Cal Hoops history lesson:

1. Cuonzo: "A mistake I made at Tennessee was offering too many schollies my first year, to guys who couldn't really help."
2. Cuonzo: "Hey Brandon Chauca, we'd like to offer you a scholarship!"
3. Wyking: "History, shmistory! Hey, McCoullough and Winston, we'd like to offer you scholarships!"

(I'm also fine with JHD coming back. He'll almost certainly get a little better and his schollie frees up in two years.)
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
JHD has shown that he is athletic, and has potential, defensively at least. He may turn out to be a good player for Cal, or he may not. So far, even considering his illness and his injury, it looks like yet another case where a player is very over-rated by those who compile recruit rankings.

We may end up with Chauca/Davis types (or Kaileb Rodriguez/Khalil Johnson types), but for heaven's sake, get them through try-outs for walk-on slots, not scholarship slots on the roster. Cole Welle was better than any one of these players, and he was a walk-on. And once in a while, you get a Forehan-Kelly.


Dyson greatly exceeded all those players in his freshman year even with his partial recovery from a big illness
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear Stru: There are some things in life that cannot be taught. 99% of players cannot be taught how to shoot, and 99% of women cannot be taught the value of silence.
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bluesaxe said:

PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
I hope like hell we aren't giving out scholarships just to get bodies. If we have to go shorthanded this season, so be it. I have no problem with keeping JHD though.
This is where Fox, if he doesn't know it already, could use a little recent Cal Hoops history lesson:

1. Cuonzo: "A mistake I made at Tennessee was offering too many schollies my first year, to guys who couldn't really help."
2. Cuonzo: "Hey Brandon Chauca, we'd like to offer you a scholarship!"
3. Wyking: "History, shmistory! Hey, McCoullough and Winston, we'd like to offer you scholarships!"

(I'm also fine with JHD coming back. He'll almost certainly get a little better and his schollie frees up in two years.)
This history lesson can easily extend through Monty's tenure and likely far beyond. The start of this post season was actually the first time I recall not having any space fillers on scholarship. Last year's group - Davis + Thorpe/Brown/Smith IV would have been a pretty solid roster IMO and didn't have any fillers.

I think we're all hoping that any offers for the sake of having bodies are offered as walk-ons, but I doubt that will be the case. It looks like we're already in consideration for a filler and I'm sure there will be a couple more riding the pine for the next 3-4 years.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PtownBear1 said:

Big C said:

bluesaxe said:

PtownBear1 said:

JHD coming back was very needed. You guys complaining are delusional. We have 7 players on the roster and Fox isn't exactly known for his recruiting prowess. An athletic former 4 star junior that hasn't reached their potential is a very good use of a scholarship.

Fox also needs to make sure he does what it takes to keep Vanover. I don't see him being able to fill 5 or 6 scholarships with P12 level players that are going to be eligible next year. My guess is at best, he'll land one grad transfer that's ready to contribute at a P12 level. And we'll likely be stuck with 2 or 3 Chauca/Davis types taking up roster space for the next several years just because we'll need the bodies.
I hope like hell we aren't giving out scholarships just to get bodies. If we have to go shorthanded this season, so be it. I have no problem with keeping JHD though.
This is where Fox, if he doesn't know it already, could use a little recent Cal Hoops history lesson:

1. Cuonzo: "A mistake I made at Tennessee was offering too many schollies my first year, to guys who couldn't really help."
2. Cuonzo: "Hey Brandon Chauca, we'd like to offer you a scholarship!"
3. Wyking: "History, shmistory! Hey, McCoullough and Winston, we'd like to offer you scholarships!"

(I'm also fine with JHD coming back. He'll almost certainly get a little better and his schollie frees up in two years.)
This history lesson can easily extend through Monty's tenure and likely far beyond. The start of this post season was actually the first time I recall not having any space fillers on scholarship. Last year's group - Davis + Thorpe/Brown/Smith IV would have been a pretty solid roster IMO and didn't have any fillers.

I think we're all hoping that any offers for the sake of having bodies are offered as walk-ons, but I doubt that will be the case. It looks like we're already in consideration for a filler and I'm sure there will be a couple more riding the pine for the next 3-4 years.
I'm totally okay with taking a project if the coaches see potential upside. Sometimes they pan out and sometimes they don't (Rod Benson v. Davis), but there is room on a 13 man roster for 1 or 2 of those. What I don't want to see are schollies waisted on projects with limited upside (Chuaca, McCullough, etc.).
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

99% of players cannot be taught how to shoot, and 99% of women cannot be taught the value of silence.
Let's hope JHD is in the 1%.

Regarding the latter, I prefer quality conversation to silence. Unfortunately I've noticed a negative correlation between quality and quantity in communication with both sexes.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Quote:

Ps. How can you be listed as a shooting guard when you can't shoot ?
In some ways, like vast unrealized potential, JHD reminds me of Marcus Lee. Maybe we'll find out if shooting can be taught.
As others have said, JHD is athletic and willing to work so he's capable of becoming a good defender. I don't know how much hoops IQ he has, but we're talking about a Cal student here, so I think JHD can be coached up. Another aspect of his return is that maybe Sueing will think twice about leaving if his fellow classmate is staying at Cal. It wouldn't be a huge reason, but as Sueing weighed the pros and cons, maybe it tips the scales a bit in our favor.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

stu said:

Quote:

I don't know how much hoops IQ he has, but we're talking about a Cal student here, so I think JHD can be coached up.


Intelligence and athletic capability are not directly related. You could get the ten best basketball coaches in America to coach me and I'm still going to be a giant liability in even women's hoops.

Harris-Dyson's one remarkable attribute is one that is shared by most college basketball players. At the high school level, it gave him an advantage. At the college level, it's not enough. He has to learn how to play basketball and the first two years don't give me any indication that's going to happen.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.