you're calling one of the greatest players of all time a fruitcake?caltagjohnson said:
Walton, the fruitcake, is a great endorsement.
helltopay1 said:
yes...
helltopay1 said:
yes...
helltopay1 said:
dear hoop------he doesn't call games---he just rants like a fruitcake --he's there for comic relief--anyone think he's funny??
whedonesque do too..rkt88edmo said:
Golden bear pirates say grrrrrrrrrrr arrrrrrr
i do, do, do do do.rkt88edmo said:
how many BI posters even know Whedon lolololol
It's been an interesting trip filled with highlights and pain along the trail to greatness as player, person, and broadcaster.JB was a Chieftain said:
Don't speak unless you know what you are talking about. You don't know half the **** Bill has been through in the last 10 years
> it's not a new or particularly interesting statement to make that there's not all that much of a difference between sports fans and "nerd" fans. One wears their favorite team jerseys while the other wears t-shirts with their favorite media characters; one cosplays and the other paints themselves up in team colors; and so on. This is even more the case with the immense commercial rise of nerds in the last two decades: San Diego Comic Con and DragonCon (and all the other immense media conventions) fill up hotels and restaurants as effectively as a Super Bowl and have just as many celebrities showing up to be part of the proceedings, albeit different celebrities. And in these COVID times, both groups are feeling the same uncertainty of wondering when, if ever, they are going to gather again in their tens of thousands to celebrate their thing. The similarities are enough that to also note that there is these days a non-trivial overlap between sports fans and nerds -- that people are entirely comfortable expressing their love for both the Cubs and Firefly -- seems anticlimactic.rkt88edmo said:
how many BI posters even know Whedon lolololol
swiped from today's blog by a former president of the sf writer's association, john scalzi:rkt88edmo said:
how many BI posters even know Whedon lolololol
I think most of us would agree that Walton's schtick has gone downhill over the last few years. Where it was once (just a guess) 40% game commentary, 40% riffing, and 20% real basketball insight, I'd say the breakdown is now 20%, 70%, 10% respectively. You can argue about the numbers but I think we all agree on the trend.HoopDreams said:
I like him for the occasional game as a change of pace. He's not going to give much deep basketball knowledge (although he knows basketball better than you or me) but he's kinda like sitting next to a funny friend at a game or a party.
I understand he's not for everyone but for him to be on ESPN then it's more than me who is entertained by him.
helltopay1 said:
dear hoop------he doesn't call games---he just rants like a fruitcake --he's there for comic relief--anyone think he's funny??
I'm not interested in defending Bill to the death. Seems like the majority here don't like Walton's broadcasts.HearstMining said:I think most of us would agree that Walton's schtick has gone downhill over the last few years. Where it was once (just a guess) 40% game commentary, 40% riffing, and 20% real basketball insight, I'd say the breakdown is now 20%, 70%, 10% respectively. You can argue about the numbers but I think we all agree on the trend.HoopDreams said:
I like him for the occasional game as a change of pace. He's not going to give much deep basketball knowledge (although he knows basketball better than you or me) but he's kinda like sitting next to a funny friend at a game or a party.
I understand he's not for everyone but for him to be on ESPN then it's more than me who is entertained by him.
helltopay1 said:
dear hoop------he doesn't call games---he just rants like a fruitcake --he's there for comic relief--anyone think he's funny??
I equate Bill to garlic - it's a great seasoning, but nobody would make a meal out of it. Moderation is key. Don't carry this analogy too far, though. Unlike eating garlic, I don't think watching him will ward off vampires.
HoopDreams said:I'm not interested in defending Bill to the death. Seems like the majority here don't like Walton's broadcasts.HearstMining said:I think most of us would agree that Walton's schtick has gone downhill over the last few years. Where it was once (just a guess) 40% game commentary, 40% riffing, and 20% real basketball insight, I'd say the breakdown is now 20%, 70%, 10% respectively. You can argue about the numbers but I think we all agree on the trend.HoopDreams said:
I like him for the occasional game as a change of pace. He's not going to give much deep basketball knowledge (although he knows basketball better than you or me) but he's kinda like sitting next to a funny friend at a game or a party.
I understand he's not for everyone but for him to be on ESPN then it's more than me who is entertained by him.
helltopay1 said:
dear hoop------he doesn't call games---he just rants like a fruitcake --he's there for comic relief--anyone think he's funny??
I equate Bill to garlic - it's a great seasoning, but nobody would make a meal out of it. Moderation is key. Don't carry this analogy too far, though. Unlike eating garlic, I don't think watching him will ward off vampires.
Maybe his best broadcasting days are behind him, but the networks seem to put him on our bigger games, so at least they think he is liked.
Perhaps I have more tolerance for his antics since I read his book, which covered his life, loves and a lot of pains
In any respect, Walton in moderation is the sweet spot for me. There are certainly a couple of 'color' people on cal basketball broadcasts that's are not very basketball informative, and a lot less entertaining. Some almost seem a sleep.
The best for me is Monty. Great basketball insights, a prior Cal coach, and even a little sarcastic wit.