Va Tech preview & prediction

2,726 Views | 46 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by RedlessWardrobe
Schroeder71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I watched the entire Stanford-Virginia Tech game after dinner last night. I decided that I would awaken early at 6:30 on Sunday morning to do my analysis. The Hokies turned out to be completely the opposite of my pre-conceived notion of the team. All season long; I had been concerned that Va Tech was too tall, too fast & too high
powered on offense for Cal to handle. In reality, VT is the most similar team to Cal of any ACC opponent to date.

I predict that the Bears will beat the Hokies, 75-72, this afternoon. Megan Duffy is in her first year as this team's head coach. She has seven years' experience running major Div I programs. She has proven to be quite successful, leading her teams to 20 + win seasons in every one of them. Jen Hoover, a former Cal assistant, is a member of her staff.

Va Tech has been trending downward, losing 5 out of their last 7 ACC games. The Hokies are only 3-5 at home in conference. Their overall record is 16-10 with a 7-8 in the ACC. Stanford lost the initial three quarters last Thursday night and trailed by 7 points heading into the final quarter. The Cardinal tied it up and forced overtime.
VT played sloppy basketball and committed 22 turnovers that led to 22 points for Stanford. PG Chloe Clardy scored 30 points to provide the impetus to pull off the upset.

Cal primarily plays six players and has all five starters averaging double figures. Va Tech employs six that are on the floor for 23.4 to 33.8 minutes per game. Four of the Hokie starters average in double figures. The Bears average approximately 9 three pointers as compared to the Hokies 7 treys per contest. Both teams can live and die by their long-range accuracy on a given day.

Women's Basketball 2024-25 - Virginia Tech Athletics

This is my analysis of their key personnel. Their starting PG is 6-0 RS-SO, Carleigh Wenzel. She has good speed and athleticism. Wenzel leads VT in scoring with 14.5 points and is second in three pointers w/ 40. She also is tops in assists (94) and second in steals w/ 30. Their primary inside force is 6-2 SR PF Rose Micheaux. She is athletic & has "hops". Her season stats are 12.3 points and 8.3 rebounds per game. Micheaux pulled down 13 boards vs Stanford. She transferred from Minnesota and this is her 2nd season at VT. The number three offensive threat is a 6-2 forward that likes to shoot from outside. Carys Baker is a 6-2 sophomore post player that puts up 12.2 points and grabs 6.5 boards. She likes to shoot threes from the corner and is 3rd on the team with 37. The player that impressed me the most was 6-2 senior wing, Matilda Ekh, from Sweden. This is her second season with the Hokies after transferring from Michigan State. Her offensive numbers are 12.0 points per game, but she is a dead-eye three-point shooter with 51 made. In the Stanford game, she was six for six from the field in the1st half and kept Va Tech in front. She comes around outside screens and gets open looks around the top of the key. Her shots are pure. Lani White should sound familiar as a transfer from Utah. This is her first season with the Hokies. She is athletic and a 6-0 junior SG who contributes 9.6 points and is fourth in treys w/ 28. In summary, the Hokies have a trio of 6-2 players that can play both inside & outside plus two 6-0 guards.

VT_SeasonStats_2024 (3).pdf

The sixth "man" is 5-8 RS FR PG, Mackenzie Nelson. She is a distributor of the ball to her shooters with 84 assists. Nelson is a spark plug on defense and leads the Hokies in steals with 34. She also adds 5.6 points to the offense. A seventh player, Kayl Petersen, sees 15 minutes per game. She is a 6-0 frosh SF that tallies 4.2 points and 2.8 rebounds per appearance. She is tied for the team lead in shot blocks w/ 19. Petersen can also hit the three with 11.

The reasons that I believe the Bears will succeed can be seen in nearly every statistical category. Va Tech has outscored their opponents on the season by 7 points but in the ACC they are -2 per game. The Hokies are yielding 74.9 ppg to conference opponents. Cal should be able to outrebound this team because of the Bears trio of 6-3 post players. VT has averaged 35.1 rpg but only 33.4 in conference. The key to victory will probably be this stat: they only force 15.7 opponent's turnovers (13.9 in the ACC) per game. I would speculate that the three-point shots will be relatively close. If Cal continues to play well (3 game winning streak), they should have an excellent chance to emerge victorious. It will not be easy. The Bears have yet to sweep an ACC road trip. GO BEARS!
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^
Agree these teams appear to be very similar in style. I will state the obvious, this game follows the familiar script: Avoid turnovers, play focused defense, Michelle minimize the fouls. We do that, we win.
Schroeder71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Michelle Onyiah can stay on the court and have a solid game (maybe a double-double), Cal will triumph.
Woodacre
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On ESPN VT is favored by 3.5. Over/under is 142.5
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
that Ioanna pass into a double teamed Gabby was a high risk, low reward pass
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VT does not play the type of pressure D that hurts us...but we are not playing good D ourselves thus far. If we tighten up the D and start making these open shots, we should win.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Michelle misses two gimmes by going up weak and then gets beat down the floor. Come on Bears.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only 2 TO's in 15 minutes, but allowing 50% shooting.
Schroeder71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Onyiah only played 4 minutes in the 1st quarter and has an opportunity to dominate with Micheaux out w/ two fouls. Onyiah gets beat by a 6-0 freshman for a 3 point play and picks up her second foul. Onyiah played 6 minutes out of 20 in the first half.

Cal has to stop the Swede, Ekh, who is 5-6 already.

Anyone notice how aggressively the Hokies are playing? Bears need to pick up the intensity a bit.

Cal has only forced 1 TO against VT at halftime. Stanford forced 22 against them on Thursday night.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
despite Michelle's two fouls (very bad), she got 2 fouls on their center in the few minutes she was in the game the second time.

That was important

Marta is our best option inside and Yo and Lulu shooting 5 of 9 from deep
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is there ever a game when Michelle doesn't have 2 fouls at the half? Same story every game.
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still haven't figured out how to defend them. Now up to 54.5% shooting.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Really passive D is hurting the Bears...and so many times they continue to hook or toss up sideways their layups or point blank shots instead of leaning into the shot and going straight off the glass aiming at the shooter's square. So the balls go either way high off the glass or airball with no chance of being fouled. Are they not taught how to shield and make the defender go through them?
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
Schroeder71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Michelle Onyiah has played one of the more unintelligent games that I have ever witnessed: 5 PFs in 13 minutes.

Bears are playing negligible defense against VT. They are shooting 55.9% from the field.

Lack of team defense and Onyiah's debacle of a performance cost Cal this game.

Matilda Okh hit 10-13 like I described in my write-up. This is the third consecutive ACC opponent that has missed only a single free throw in an entire game. Cal made 100% of their FTs today.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not her best. Fouls were NOT ones of aggression. Very careless.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess you can say the VT center has made a number of silly fouls too
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal defenders have been chasing the whole game. VT does not look quick I don't understand why they are not able to stay in front.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
need to score here. doesn't need to be a 3
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Cal defenders have been chasing the whole game. VT does not look quick I don't understand why they are not able to stay in front.
can't seem to defend Wenzel
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We seem to have not prioritized cutting them off on drives and have gone for small fakes instead all game long.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
that was clutch FTs from Kayla
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our worst performance of the year...and it will hurt us. Huge bummer.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ioanna made the tough pass to Lulu and she got a reasonable but tough look from 3

we lost it on the defensive side of the court

big lost opportunity



annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just don't think we had the right defensive game plan in this one. Giving up 55.9% shooting and 87 points (50 in the second half) shows that.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Our worst performance of the year...and it will hurt us. Huge bummer.
maybe worst defensive performance, but we shot 50% including 10-24 (42%) from 3 and perfect 14-14 FTs and scored 84 pts

That wins most games
Schroeder71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree that was the worst defensive game by Cal by far. Could not get a stop (especially in the third quarter when the Bears gave up 29 points). Va Tech 87, Cal 84.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

blungld said:

Our worst performance of the year...and it will hurt us. Huge bummer.
maybe worst defensive performance, but we shot 50% including 10-24 (42%) from 3 and perfect 14-14 FTs and scored 84 pts

That wins most games
That's true.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

^
Agree these teams appear to be very similar in style. I will state the obvious, this game follows the familiar script: Avoid turnovers, play focused defense, Michelle minimize the fouls. We do that, we win.
My pregame simplified outline.

Results: Yes, NO, NO. 1 out of 3 isn't gonna cut it.
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stanford had forced VT into 22 TO's and we managed to force them into only 5. Looks like we should have watched more game film.
SFCALBear72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charmin concurs with the assessments here:


On the loss"I just think we didn't defend well enough. They shot the ball well. We had trouble guarding ball screen action and it's just one of those games where we did a lot of things right offensively, but couldn't prevent them from scoring. It's frustrating and disappointing. We had opportunities and we couldn't capitalize."
Ashfield63
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not defending Cal's defensive approach today, but it's just tough winning on the road especially travelling across the country. Cal didn't arrive in Richmond, Virgina until 3am, but got the W on Thursday.

Notre Dame lost at N.C. State today....2OT periods. N.C. could have won in regulation had their coach used their fouls to give during the last few seconds of the game. Rebecca Lobo's observation!

However, North Carolina pulled out the W at Louisville. Jayda Curry has come into her own of late, but missed a 3 at the end of the game for the tie. It 's a big deal for NC to beat them at Louisville.

It would have been awesome for the BEARS to win both games, but they have a chance to upset Georgia Tech on Thursday. GT is playing at home and up by 6 points with 3 minutes left in the 2nd quarter vs Florida St.

Safe travels for the flight home. Despite the outcome today, I have thoroughly enjoyed watching Cal WBB in their first season in the ACC. GO BEARS! See you on Thursday....
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not having Michelle in hurt us defensively
BearBint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annarborbear said:

Stanford had forced VT into 22 TO's and we managed to force them into only 5. Looks like we should have watched more game film.
As I type, Virginia is punishing Stanford: 79-52 with 7 minutes left in the fourth quarter.
"Don't get distracted, myself. Don't get distracted." Self-talk from a young relative
Ashfield63
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Not having Michelle in hurt us defensively
For Sure!!! It is disappointing she didn't play many minutes. VT's center is from Sweden. They showed her Dad in the stands. He flew to the U.S. for his daughter's last home game.

The ACC teams are having close games, and some unpredictable results.....Florida State gets the W at Georgia Tech!

Virginia is killing Stanford after 3 quarters. Lattimore is playing great. I was hoping she would play for Cal, but went to Syracuse, then Texas, now at Virginia.....I think she is from Toronto.
gljone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I missed the detail that is was Va Tech's senior day. So that probably gave their intensity a bump.

When Michelle only plays 13 minutes, Cal's chances for victory decrease immensely. Just the fact she's on the floor make opposing offenses know there's presence in the paint.

If she's not on the court, there's no fear factor and the opposing offense knows if they can get by the first defender, they have options.

Except for Kayla, I don't really see any of the other starters keeping their player in front of them consistently.

If I'm the opposing team and don't see Michelle on the court defensively? I feel like I'm getting a quality opportunity every time down the court.

Conversely, if I'm the opposing team and Michelle is not on the court, I know I can extend on Cal's shooters without having to pay for it in the paint (again on a consistent basis).

Not to put this defeat all on Michelle but her missing due to foul trouble puts this team in a bad position on both sides of the court.

And she had 8 points and 3 rebounds when she WAS on the court. Project that to 26 minutes and Cal wins the game.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.