With all the kids who came on that Friday I expect to a large crowd. They are afternoon games too.
Nerd_Vernacular;842610445 said:
I'm excited to be there for Cal's game tomorrow. Will be there for both games on Sunday (hi, I am new, this is my second post, go bears!)
Nerd_Vernacular;842610445 said:
I'm excited to be there for Cal's game tomorrow. Will be there for both games on Sunday (hi, I am new, this is my second post, go bears!)
Well lucky or not, looks like you can see the 1st game with Cal :headbangwvitbear;842609730 said:
So I may not see the second game.
GOCAL73;842612083 said:
There were maybe 1000 at the Cal game today, and I'm being generous.
stu;842612198 said:
All but a few hundred missed not only a most entertaining win, but also an NCAA record 80 three-point attempts by one team. [URL="http://www.hornetsports.com/sports/wbkb/2015-16/releases/20151206wpunnm"][COLOR="#0000FF"]Sac State story[/COLOR][/URL]
GOCAL73;842612083 said:
There were maybe 1000 at the Cal game today, and I'm being generous. Almost all were season tickets holders, although a bunch of the regulars were MIA. Did not not notice hundreds of school kids with their parents. Maybe they were attending Furd's kids day game.
Islander670;842612361 said:
Methinks a few of you are misunderstanding what their stated purpose in the kids game is. It's not so that the next game 500 extra kids show up with their parents because they had fun a week ago. It's to build their excitement for CAL and the WBB team over the years. Later this season a few of those kids may convince their parents to take them to a game. Next year two or three games. A couple of the girls might start playing basketball because they want to "play for Cal" after seeing our team. Who knows, one of them might end up being recruited by Cal.
You keep thinking about it simplistically because you (the collective you, not you particularly) didn't get the chance to see a game. Others think about growing the SPORT and the program over the long term. Grassroots ... it doesn't happen overnight. And if all else fails, just tell yourself it was a road game that you wouldn't have seen anyway.
Nerd_Vernacular;842613254 said:
Yall's seem kinda mad about this thing. I thought it was nice for the kids. I actually took off of work that day to go see the game. Being there with all those screaming kids was a lot of fun. These are Bay Area kids, maybe a lot of them are from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods and backgrounds, similar to some of Cal's athlete's. It can only be positive for those children. I can't think of any way that it might be negative for them.
GOCAL73;842613489 said:
I think the concept is wonderful. But, would they scream any less if the opponent was Vanguard? Don't think it would make a bit of difference to the young kids, most of whom know nothing about WBB. If the goal is positive role models and exposure to college, what difference does it make if the game is regular season or exhibition? Season ticket holders shouldn't have to take off work to support the team. Contrary to popular myth, not all of us are retirees. Sorry just believe that Cal WBB should serve the interests of their fan base first and foremost. I think this promotion can be re-worked so that everyone wins.
ClayK;842613587 said:
The media, and the world in general, has no obligation to women's sports or women's basketball. Of course it's a chicken-and-egg thing: If more people come, the media will cover; but without media coverage, it's unlikely more people will come.
And the bottom line for attendance isn't marketing or game times or kids' days -- it's winning, plain and simple. If the Cal women's basketball team gets to the Final Four three out of four years, attendance will go up (and maybe even some female students will deign to watch). One year won't do it, as has been shown, but consistent excellence is the best way to increase attendance in "minor" sports. (And even attendance in football and men's basketball is dependent on winning ...)
There are many issues involving collegiate women's sports, but the most important factor to me is that Cal students (and students at most other schools) don't go to women's games. That creates excitement and atmosphere and fun, but as long as female students especially prefer men's basketball to women's basketball, it's going to be hard to generate more attendance.
Marketing and the media are not nearly as important in terms of boosting attendance: Winning and getting students to want to go to games, just as they want to go to the men's games, is what would change things.
wvitbear;842614338 said:
What I want to know is where4 are all the students from Women Studies. I'm sure they would all support Title IX and would frown on calling the women's team the Lady Bears, but why don't they buy a ticket. Put your money where your mouth is.