concordtom;842676746 said:
Huh? Louisiana Tech is NOT Tennessee, so I don't think Nepotism was at play here. Reputation, yes, but not Nepotism.
Or are you suggesting that all kids of successful parents must choose a different career than their parents, otherwise they might have sex with coworkers or subordinates?
It was the reputation of Pat Summit not her son. So yes he was hired because of his mother. If he were not Pats son he never would have gotten hired.
No I am not suggesting that children chose a different vocation than their parents only that they need to be hired on their own merit and not because of what their parents accomplish. Many young people actually change their names to avoid being hired because of their parents reputation. Do you think there is nothing wrong with hiring someone not based on merit but purely on a relations reputation?
In respect to your response to iminocs post. His age was only a mitigating factor for his issue. However he was hired ( despite his age ) because he was Pat Summits son, pure and simple. It was because of who he was related too. Some companies will not hire two people from the same family just to avoid this type of favoritism.
I still stand by my statement. We were supposed to have left the aristocratic family class distinctions behind us in Europe. Good breeding and genetics etc. I suppose some people long for the good old days.