Nice Place to Visit...

2,458 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by GOLDEN
R90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I visit the Pacific Northwest once or twice in a typical year and love it up there, but I'd never choose to stay a long time. The odds of experiencing a 9.0 earthquake and devastating tsunami just keep on increasing the longer you stay there:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one

"At an elementary school in the community of Gearhart, the children will be trapped. “They can’t make it out from that school,” Dougherty said. “They have no place to go.” On one side lies the ocean; on the other, a wide, roadless bog. When the tsunami comes, the only place to go in Gearhart is a small ridge just behind the school. At its tallest, it is forty-five feet high—lower than the expected wave in a full-margin earthquake. For now, the route to the ridge is marked by signs that say “Temporary Tsunami Assembly Area.” I asked Dougherty about the state’s long-range plan. “There is no long-range plan,” he said."

"In Oregon, it has been illegal since 1995 to build hospitals, schools, firehouses, and police stations in the inundation zone, but those which are already in it can stay, and any other new construction is permissible: energy facilities, hotels, retirement homes. In those cases, builders are required only to consult with DOGAMI about evacuation plans. “So you come in and sit down,” Ian Madin says. “And I say, ‘That’s a stupid idea.’ And you say, ‘Thanks. Now we’ve consulted.’ ”
59bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"...nothing to fear but fear itself...".
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're vulnerable to earthquakes all up and down the West Coast, and to storms on any coast. At least we have some control over the safety of our individual living situations. In the long run I think we're likely to suffer more damage from our own actions than from natural forces.

Is this another Sabrina thread? Would she be safer in Scandanavia?
GOLDEN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu;842687507 said:

We're vulnerable to earthquakes all up and down the West Coast, and to storms on any coast. At least we have some control over the safety of our individual living situations. In the long run I think we're likely to suffer more damage from our own actions than from natural forces.

Is this another Sabrina thread? Would she be safer in Scandanavia?



The question is where would Sopak be safer? In his latest tweet he was is Seattle decked out in a little Husky gear. North Cal high school pipeline laid thru Seattle now? So his employers ought to know. Will there be an exodus from CAL Stars? What a circus for the kids involved and employers.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.