Voter fraud

29,383 Views | 268 Replies | Last: 22 days ago by bear2034
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump lawyer knew plan to delay Biden certification was unlawful, emails show


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/mar/10/trump-lawyer-plan-john-eastman-mike-pence?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

10 more instances of Republican voter fraud found. This version should absolutely be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Agreed. However, this is a case of "election fraud", not "voter fraud."
Tedhead94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, well, well. Yet another. And she is still running on the GOP ticket no less. https://www.businessinsider.com/colorado-clerk-tina-peters-indicted-on-election-data-breach-counts-2022-3?amp
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How Georgia 2020 Election Results Were Electronically Manipulated

Fulton County election manipulation evidence. Other counties in GA have similar problems:

  • 17,724 final certified Fulton votes have no ballot images
  • all 374,128 in person ballot images for the original count are missing
  • 132,284 mail in ballot images cannot be authenticated due to missing .sha files
  • 4,000+ tabulator images have impossible duplicate time stamps
  • 104,994 image files in 1,096 batches have impossible duplicate time stamps
  • all ballot batches were improperly forced to adjudication to facilitate tampering
  • only one or two individuals with extensive voting system expertise needed to manipulate images
  • manipulation activities were performed without ability for most officials to detect them
  • Raffensperger could have done the same analysis and reached the same conclusions prior to certifying the 2020 election
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bass, your well reasoned and information filled message is falling on deaf ears. BF2 is not interested in either of those things. He deals entirely in false information and faux outrage. With a heaping portion of projection. Lost cause.

Good post, though. Thanks for your contribution.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

bass, your well reasoned and information filled message is falling on deaf ears. BF2 is not interested in either of those things. He deals entirely in false information and faux outrage. With a heaping portion of projection. Lost cause.

Good post, though. Thanks for your contribution.
Thanks. Facts, common sense, and a little derision seem to be keeping the rate of "Trump won" posts down. And I think he's being a bit more judicious about his apparent opportunities to post.

I just can't stand to see false narratives go unchallenged, whether it's "Left", "Right", or somewhere out in the Q-niverse.

Capital has been pretty successful in keeping us divided, and these false narratives are an essential part of the strategy. Don't take the bait!

BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

AunBear89 said:

bass, your well reasoned and information filled message is falling on deaf ears. BF2 is not interested in either of those things. He deals entirely in false information and faux outrage. With a heaping portion of projection. Lost cause.

Good post, though. Thanks for your contribution.
Thanks. Facts, common sense, and a little derision seem to be keeping the rate of "Trump won" posts down. And I think he's being a bit more judicious about his apparent opportunities to post.

I just can't stand to see false narratives go unchallenged, whether it's "Left", "Right", or somewhere out in the Q-niverse.

Capital has been pretty successful in keeping us divided, and these false narratives are an essential part of the strategy. Don't take the bait!


In general, having AunBear agreeing with you is not a good thing.
Trump won. Dems stole the election.
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
What evidence? You guys are about 0 for 65 in court cases. Obviously your "evidence" hasn't been compelling in the legal system.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
What evidence? You guys are about 0 for 65 in court cases. Obviously your "evidence" hasn't been compelling in the legal system.
Why do you ignore court rulings like the ones in WI and PA?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
What evidence? You guys are about 0 for 65 in court cases. Obviously your "evidence" hasn't been compelling in the legal system.
Why do you ignore court rulings like the ones in WI and PA?


Why do you believe bullshyte and act like you want to solve anything?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:




Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
BF, I love how you use the GOP wins in 27 'tossup' races as "evidence" of cheating by Democrats.

So many of your other points involve actual crimes -- but where are the prosecutions of the individuals involved??

Oh, that's right. The only "evidence" of said crimes is the severe bruising of The LOSER's fragile ego.

How's the search for those ballot traffickers going?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yet another case of a high-level Republican commiting voter fraud:
https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-chris-christie-new-jersey-new-hampshire-congress-734e2b2722c66883eab85bfca96fbc8c
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Yet another case of a high-level Republican commiting voter fraud:
https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-chris-christie-new-jersey-new-hampshire-congress-734e2b2722c66883eab85bfca96fbc8c


Republican voter fraud is going to be off the charts going forward. They are so shameless about it, have been changing laws to enable it and have taken control of the voting apparatus to prevent the safeguards that stopped Trump and his enablers from successfully stealing the 2020 election.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
Are you whining again?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like the ordinary Republican, his platform is composed of imagined grievances.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:




Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
BF, I love how you use the GOP wins in 27 'tossup' races as "evidence" of cheating by Democrats.

So many of your other points involve actual crimes -- but where are the prosecutions of the individuals involved??

Oh, that's right. The only "evidence" of said crimes is the severe bruising of The LOSER's fragile ego.

How's the search for those ballot traffickers going?



cbass, you of all people here know the Dems cheated and the RINOs helped them. You know transparency is crucial and both election and government officials have been anything but. Why are you in denial? If the states truly ran a clean election, they would have nothing to hide would they?
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:



Suppressed information....someone always knows something. Barr knew about Hunter's laptop for over a year and sat on it to keep it nice and warm before the NYPost eventually broke the story and he also knows what happened in November of 2020.
The CBSNews article posted by Rasmussen was pretty informative. One of the top priorities for CISA's Krebs, going into 2020, was to use hand-marked paper ballots as much as possible. I like this guy!

BF2 -- About your obsession with ballot images... get over it. They have the ballots. They recounted them 3x, and got the same result, with very little variation. Again. Get over it.

Ballot images can be deleted by just about anyone, from either side or party. But who cares when you do a hand recount? The ballot images are a useful check on the scanners. The images can be reprocessed to "recount" the votes. But a hand-recount, in an open, observable environment, with citizen oversight, is the gold standard.

More from the article:

Chris Krebs: "Look, I think these-- we can go on and on with all the farcical claims that-- alleging-- interference in the 2020 election, but the proof is in the ballots. The recounts are consistent with the initial count, and to me, that's further evidence, that's confirmation that the systems used in the 2020 election performed as expected, and the American people should have 100% confidence in their vote."

Your list of gripes isn't evidence. It's irrelevant.


Biden FEC Nominee ADMITS Her Name Is On Legal Document Attesting Voting Machines Used In GA ILLEGALLY SWITCHED VOTES From One Candidate To Another in 2018 election.



cbbass1, when the cheaters do a recount, they end up with the same numbers sometimes they get more votes, is that surprising? There should be an independent forensic audit of the paper ballots and voting machines.
Quote:

We are living in an alternate world. When a lawyer working for a top Democrat operative admits that she swore under oath that the voting machines in Georgia switched votes from one candidate to anotherand this is the first you're hearing about it, while the media and their allies in the Democrat Party have DEMONIZED Mike Lindell and Matt DePerno for almost two years for saying the same thingthere is a serious problem with the truth in our nation!

Why would this surprise you? And why would you think that this is the first I've heard about it?

You refer to "the cheaters" -- still, with NO EVIDENCE.

Elections in GA, under GOP leadership, have been a disaster for years.

This is why voting machines from private vendors with proprietary source code are a huge problem. There's no physical record of the intent of the voter. The concept of a recount is meaningless. Proprietary code can be hacked. And since the code is proprietary, there's no way for public election officials to review or verify that the code just records & counts votes.

Vote On Paper.

As for Biden's FEC nominee, she apparently filled out an affidavit. Good for her. Vote-switching code has been a problem for decades, usually in the Republicans' favor.

You have to remember that your candidate said many times, "If I LOSE, it's because there was cheating." That's why he's still accusing everyone of cheating -- without evidence to back it up -- because HE LOST. On top of that, he's emotionally incapable of any self-reflection that would inform him of why he lost. I never thought I'd see anyone worse at this than Hillary, but Trump has outdone her. At least she had the sense to concede & move on.

On the Dominion defamation lawsuit -- you can't accuse a corporation of serious crimes without being able to provide one stitch of evidence that they committed those crimes. Get real.

And good luck on getting a subpoena for Dominion to reveal their proprietary source code.

I suggest that you go back to square 1 and check out www.blackboxvoting.org. Bev Harris & her team have been on a worthy crusade against private-sector voting machines for nearly 20 years now, and they're working to make our elections fair, free, and open.


Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
Are you whining again?
Trump is winning again, for the third time.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

chazzed said:

Yet another case of a high-level Republican commiting voter fraud:
https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-chris-christie-new-jersey-new-hampshire-congress-734e2b2722c66883eab85bfca96fbc8c


Republican voter fraud is going to be off the charts going forward. They are so shameless about it, have been changing laws to enable it and have taken control of the voting apparatus to prevent the safeguards that stopped Trump and his enablers from successfully stealing the 2020 election.

Voting in France is on Sunday: NO Mail-in Ballots, NO Dirty Voting Machines, Only Paper Ballots and EVERYONE Must Show a Voter ID

Democrats could never make it in France.
They can't cheat.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Like the ordinary Republican, his platform is composed of imagined grievances.


Every democracy has voter ID laws except the US where Democrats fight these laws. Why is that? Do they really think blacks are so beneath them that they can't get a free ID? Or are they cheating? And why are RINOs so afraid to stand up to this to prevent voter fraud?

In the French election, the ballots will be counted by hand and the winner is announced by the end of the day, not several days later, not counted by machines connected to the internet, counting doesn't stop at 1 am, ballots don't start arriving behind closed doors, etc......
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:




Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
BF, I love how you use the GOP wins in 27 'tossup' races as "evidence" of cheating by Democrats.

So many of your other points involve actual crimes -- but where are the prosecutions of the individuals involved??

Oh, that's right. The only "evidence" of said crimes is the severe bruising of The LOSER's fragile ego.

How's the search for those ballot traffickers going?



cbass, you of all people here know the Dems cheated and the RINOs helped them. You know transparency is crucial and both election and government officials have been anything but. Why are you in denial? If the states truly ran a clean election, they would have nothing to hide would they?
How would I "know" that the Dems cheated without any evidence??

If they had actually cheated, then why couldn't Sidney Powell & Rudy Giuliani present any evidence that they had in at least one of their 65 court cases?? Do I have to get the transcripts to show you all their hemming & hawing & evasion when the time came to provide evidence to support their claims??

They had nothing, they showed nothing, and that's still all they have -- NOTHING.

That's why Trump now admits that he lost.
Trump admits loss
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearForce2 said:




Why are you in denial of the evidence?
WHAT evidence??? You have some?? Do tell!!

Why do you say this was the most secure election in history? Only legal, certifiable, and chain of custody verifiable ballots count!

* The thousands of legal affidavits claiming election fraud in numerous states.
* The millions of illegally trafficked ballots.
* That Republicans picked up seats in statehouses and the US House.
* That Trump won ALL of the bellwether counties but one.
* That Republicans won ALL 27 of the "tossup" House races.
* The unexplained late-night ballot drops.
* The coordinated announcement in 5 states that counting would be shut down for the night with President Trump winning in each of the states.
* The thousands of ballot traffickers caught on video or from phone data.
* The impossible mathematical odds for a Biden win a 1 in 2,666-year victory!
* The impossible drop and roll numbers.
* The lack of chain of custody for MILLIONS of US ballots.
* The USPS whistleblowers who drove trailers of ballots across state lines yet were ignored by Chris Wray and Bill Barr.
* Locking the GOP observers out of the counting rooms.
* The endless supply of ballots flowing into the election centers days after the election.
* The stolen military votes
* The elderly abuse: Tens of thousands of stolen nursing home votes in Wisconsin thousands more than the 20,682 votes that gave Joe Biden the victory.
* The Dominion voting company will not allow a single outside expert to inspect their machines.
* The historic enthusiasm for President Trump something not seen since Ronald Reagan.
BF, I love how you use the GOP wins in 27 'tossup' races as "evidence" of cheating by Democrats.

So many of your other points involve actual crimes -- but where are the prosecutions of the individuals involved??

Oh, that's right. The only "evidence" of said crimes is the severe bruising of The LOSER's fragile ego.

How's the search for those ballot traffickers going?



cbass, you of all people here know the Dems cheated and the RINOs helped them. You know transparency is crucial and both election and government officials have been anything but. Why are you in denial? If the states truly ran a clean election, they would have nothing to hide would they?
How would I "know" that the Dems cheated without any evidence??

If they had actually cheated, then why couldn't Sidney Powell & Rudy Giuliani present any evidence that they had in at least one of their 65 court cases?? Do I have to get the transcripts to show you all their hemming & hawing & evasion when the time came to provide evidence to support their claims??

They had nothing, they showed nothing, and that's still all they have -- NOTHING.

That's why Trump now admits that he lost.
Trump admits loss



cbass, there's a special place in this world for election fraud deniers. They get placed in the same room with people who continue to believe in the Russia collusion hoax and deny the validity of Hunter's Biden laptop. You should be asking questions at this point based on the evidence that is being revealed instead of declaring there was no fraud. It's amusing you bring up Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani,. if you think they are lying lunatics, why did twitter ban them? Don't deny, decertify.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shut up. You know nothing and demonstrate your ignorance and gullibility with every post.

Just. Shut. Up.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Shut up. You know nothing and demonstrate your ignorance and gullibility with every post.

Just. Shut. Up.


Your favorite right winger Charlie Kirk will be visiting the Berkeley campus this Wednesday night as part of his Educate, Don't Mandate tour. I would post a twitter link but twitter banned him.

https://www.dailycal.org/2022/04/11/conservative-commentator-charlie-kirk-to-make-campus-appearance/
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Charlie Kirk and Liz Harrington are also idiots. That's why you follow them so closely. Birds of a feather. . .







I really hope Charlie recognizes that you are his biggest fan boy and lets you take a selfie with him. It'll give you something to keep you warm during those long lonely nights.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's amazing about all of this fraud is they did it on the front end, before election night. And they quickly realized they still didn't have enough to beat President Trump. They had to scramble and stop the count in the middle of the night behind locked doors to collect more ballots.

Trump was right, it was the BIG STEAL, CRIME OF THE CENTURY.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Repeat a lie enough times and all the morons will believe it.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You lie all the time but no one believes you.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.