Police shoot and kill Unarmed Pregnant woman

4,348 Views | 50 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by oski003
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?









How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shouldn't the headline read:

"Police shoot and kill non-complying suspected armed carjacker. Gun found near but not on person. Suspect was shot while walking away from the officers and did not appear to be an imminent threat."
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So why wasn't the buffalo mass shooter shot ?

And Dylan roof

And ….
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

So why wasn't the buffalo mass shooter shot ?

And Dylan roof

And ….


Likely because the officers didn't think they were imminent threats to anyone at that moment and then they complied?. My comment was focused on the videos you posted and their description of the events.
WalterSobchak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Knew before I clicked who Post #2 would be from and what it would be about. He did not let me down.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

So why wasn't the buffalo mass shooter shot ?

And Dylan roof

And ….

Because he was a left wing Ukraine Azov sympathizer.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WalterSobchak said:

Knew before I clicked who Post #2 would be from and what it would be about. He did not let me down.

When all else fails,
Go 4 racism.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

WalterSobchak said:

Knew before I clicked who Post #2 would be from and what it would be about. He did not let me down.

When all else fails,
Go 4 racism.


Once again
Pay close attention
Going (go) 4 something/anything means to be pro/for it correct ?

Baby steps now

Tell me why would I be for the demise of me and those that look like me ? Where do I benefit?

I don't capitulate like those sellouts you pay to push your racist agenda.

Oh one more thing your people created this problem for us. Fix it … we are waiting
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

BearForce2 said:

WalterSobchak said:

Knew before I clicked who Post #2 would be from and what it would be about. He did not let me down.

When all else fails,
Go 4 racism.


Once again
Pay close attention
Going (go) 4 something/anything means to be pro/for it correct ?

Baby steps now

Tell me why would I be for the demise of me and those that look like me ? Where do I benefit?

I don't capitulate like those sellouts you pay to push your racist agenda.

Oh one more thing your people created this problem for us. Fix it … we are waiting

You are a black supremacist no?, tell me if I'm wrong.

"You can't talk about police violence without talking about black violence." - Larry Elder
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WalterSobchak said:

Knew before I clicked who Post #2 would be from and what it would be about. He did not let me down.


The headlines are biased. I provided an objective headline that isn't purposely divisive. The headline is the problem, not me.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Objective from the center of whiteness
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


The police should know better than to shoot fleeing suspected armed carjackers. It is a difficult job, and they need to make better choices. The victim paid for her terrible choices and the cops should to, depending on what the actual facts are. It could be anywhere from justification/no heavy discipline to losing their jobs to murder.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You must work for the police Union
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
WalterSobchak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.
Is this a frame from a police body cam video? Looks like it might be. If so, where's the full video?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

You must work for the police Union
Focus really hard and the right conclusion is usually readily apparent. If you're 003, you advocate the opposite every single time.

Let's try it here. Situation - a fleeing pregnant woman who poses no threat to police is shot 5 times in the back, killing her. 003's response is no surprise.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Listen and learn
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:



Listen and learn


I am so sorry that you are so foolishly influenced by this racist extremist anti-cop drivel.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.


HERE YOU GO …
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.


HERE YOU GO …



Edited photo !!!
Why ?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

going4roses said:

BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.


HERE YOU GO …



Edited photo !!!
Why ?
They photoshopped another body into the picture to show a gun in her hand but forgot to give her TWO ankles.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

going4roses said:

going4roses said:

BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.


HERE YOU GO …



Edited photo !!!
Why ?
They photoshopped another body into the picture to show a gun in her hand but forgot to give her TWO ankles.

That photoshopper is probably out of a job now and might want to consider a career change.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

going4roses said:

going4roses said:

BearForce2 said:

going4roses said:

Shot 5 time's in the back clearly unarmed


Change the headline. Change the narrative. The facts changed.


HERE YOU GO …



Edited photo !!!
Why ?
They photoshopped another body into the picture to show a gun in her hand but forgot to give her TWO ankles.

That photoshopper is probably out of a job now and might want to consider a career change.
Let's not even ask why her left wrist and hand are magically behind the fence posts while the rest of her body is about 4 or 5 feet away from the fence. Arms like that might have gotten her a WNBA or women's soccer contract.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Funny not funny lol
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leonna Hale has been charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful use of a weapon, and a misdemeanor resisting a lawful detention.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
must be a mistake....Everyone knows only whites commit serious crimes. I better check the Chron or the NYT, or the Wash Post or CNN or MSNBC or the View to get the real story....She was probably a white in black face...Yeah...that's it..
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearForce2 said:

Leonna Hale has been charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful use of a weapon, and a misdemeanor resisting a lawful detention.


Well at this point they have to cover their tracks of usual bs. After posting that fake photo you need have coke and a smile and stfu.
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So she was armed, not unarmed, and wasn't pregnant. But other than that . . .

https://www.kcur.org/news/2022-06-01/jackson-county-prosecutor-files-gun-charges-against-woman-shot-by-kansas-city-police

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article262096057.html

And for the record, the black mayor of Kansas City is vouching for the photo's authenticity.

helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roses....What is it with you and white folks?????
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The photo looks bad so they should release video. Still, the photo glitches are probably the result of data compression. If confirmed, I have no problem with the police shooting someone with a gun who acted in any way counter to complying with police demands. If someone has a gun the police should shoot first and ask questions later at the first hint of there being an issue.
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo........there is hope for you yet.....
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is the rub when closely looking at historical accounts of police unaliving melaninated people vs people of European decent the precedent is clear.

In this situation as well as others if she was white or perceived as white she would not have been shot.

That is the problem.

I have seen white assailants shoot people with arms and the are treated as if they are wrapped in bubbled wrap and handle with care stickers.

If ws/systemic racism exists the police/justice system are always going to have protect whiteness as the default.

I have seen white folks with weapons chasing after police … most times not shot and almost never un-alived.

One case … Tamir Rice would not be dead if he was not melaninated.

The history of policing is inherently evil towards melaninated people since their inception.

If it's a spade im going to call it a spade
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

going4roses said:

You must work for the police Union
Focus really hard and the right conclusion is usually readily apparent. If you're 003, you advocate the opposite every single time.

Let's try it here. Situation - a fleeing pregnant woman who poses no threat to police is shot 5 times in the back, killing her. 003's response is no surprise.

Let's try again. Facts as we now know them:

- Carjacker
- Armed with gun she pointed at cops
- Not pregnant
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.