Return of the Wild West. Thank you, SCOTUS! - Page 2

DiabloWags

Joined: Sep 26, 2018

Posts: 10,535

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to bearister • 8:02p, 6/24/22

bearister said:
If they ever impose these favorable conceal carry laws on California, it is going to be real interesting for the police to pat down suspected criminals. When they feel the piece, the presumption is going to be it is legal. What happens next?

Excellent point.

dimitrig

Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Posts: 8,668

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to DiabloWags • 8:03p, 6/24/22

DiabloWags said:
bearister said:
If they ever impose these favorable conceal carry laws on California, it is going to be real interesting for the police to pat down suspected criminals. When they feel the piece, the presumption is going to be it is legal. What happens next?

Excellent point.

I dunno. What happens in Texas? Why is California any different?

tequila4kapp

Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Posts: 14,541

User Profile

Private Message

Ignore User Stop Ignoring

How long do you want to ignore this user?

24 hours One week Permanently Cancel

In reply to DiabloWags • 8:09a, 6/25/22

DiabloWags said:
tequila4kapp said:
I don't care to get into a debate about it but you do know there's a whole other body of work and line of reasoning to the opposite conclusion, including but not limited to the Heller decision.

Yes, Im aware of Heller.
Just like you're aware of "Trigger Laws" in regards to Roe v Wade, right?

????
I don't see your point, at all.

I'm not being antagonist when I suggest you read Heller, if you haven't already. I did last night for the 1st time. It is the most unique decision I've ever read - it goes phrase by phrase to explain the scope and meaning of the 2nd Am. You may not like/agree with the answer but it's right there for the reading and Scalia is extraordinarily skilled at explaining it.

3

1 edit