Republicans gonna Republican

378,137 Views | 3672 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by chazzed
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

You do realize he has posted lots of things about me out of hatred.

The slow comment was reactionary which is not nearly as bad as his coded racist back handed statements.

I have never professed to being infallible
I think he hates your focus on criticism of one specific race more than he hates you. He doesn't know you, so it would be impossible to hate you. Even if he hates you, since he doesn't know you, it is not you that he hates. To be honest, I think your way of communicating things you think are important are very divisive. It is understandable if you are just venting, but if you are trying to inform and educate, maybe a more open and understanding way would be more impactful? Up to you, obviously.

Also, if you are against personal attack, it is best I think not to engage instead of retaliating with more personal attack. Excusing behavior by saying so and so started first has never eliminated the underlying issue.

I am guilty in the past as well. And I realized that is what makes this site often stupid. So, I am trying, as someone who used to be one of the offenders, to address issues and not show weakness in my argument by turning to personal attack even when trolled.



okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think both points being made about the GOP and TikTok are correct. The GOP can hate TikTok for more than one reason. The security issue is probably the primary reason, but they probably see it as a pro-Democrat, anti-GOP platform and they don't like that either.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a fair assessment/plausible.

I can definitely see both being a factor
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now do Republicans, and specifically the Trump crime family. We will wait. . .
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If true isn't that how things work here in America ?

Don't lie

Oh nice try to pivot the thread
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't vouch for the validity

But …
https://nextshark.com/desantis-signs-florida-aapi-history-bill
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18 to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?

MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?


The same reason those people had to learn the rules of the road before we allowed them to drive a vehicle. Is it that much that we require people to understand our system of government before we allow them to vote on who's in it? This is like the lowest common denominator sh*t.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trumpers hate voters
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.


You just pointed out why this is stupid.

dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Trumpers hate voters


Why do Republicans hate America?

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.

I rest my case!
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because they are losing control / birth numbers-population falling off the end game is near

And the truth about America really being Amerikkka
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.
Damn. Then what the hell were we doing for an hour a day in junior high?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.


You just pointed out why this is stupid.


No, I pointed out that some 65s and 18s hardly learned civics and that's a negative for society
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civics for an unjust society
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Civics for an unjust society
Go find one that fits you.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:

Civics for an unjust society
Go find one that fits you.


Pay the debt owed and I'll consider it. Take responsibility.
I didn't come here of free will if you didn't know .
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

sycasey said:

dimitrig said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:


Vivek isn't going to win but it's good he's saying these things and challenging the status quo, forcing other candidates to respond to the question. It's an interesting idea to be sure.


The proposal is stupid. Why should people 18' to 25 have to take a test while people who poop their own pants in a nursing home can vote with no restrictions?



Indeed. Before we decide on arbitrary age restrictions I'd like to give the same test to a large random sample of 18-25 year olds and 65+ year olds and see who does better.
Makes no sense, because some of those 65+ didn't have to learn civics either.


You just pointed out why this is stupid.


No, I pointed out that some 65s and 18s hardly learned civics and that's a negative for society

Then my proposal is to teach more civics and then make it easy to vote so more people can exercise their civic duty.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:

Civics for an unjust society
Go find one that fits you.


Pay the debt owed and I'll consider it. Take responsibility.
I didn't come here of free will if you didn't know .


Most posters on this site were born here or their folks moved here when they were young and did not come here of their free will. Should we pool together parents' income and distribute equally?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

MinotStateBeav said:

going4roses said:

Civics for an unjust society
Go find one that fits you.


Pay the debt owed and I'll consider it. Take responsibility.
I didn't come here of free will if you didn't know .
You get 1 high five.

Goodbye.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?


First Page Last Page
Page 36 of 105
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.