More explicit, genuine and unflinching penance for past mistakes in this single two-minute video than most media figures offer in their entire careers: https://t.co/ew3cxBb3Cj

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 16, 2023

I understand the maximum contempt that will come with posting this lol..have at it.

tuck's only apologizing because he knows that's the latest thing for trumpers to do: boast about being anti war. Which is remarkable considering conservative's/republican's historical love for war.

This is not new. He's been acknowledging he was wrong about Iraq for years.

He makes an interesting point about sourcing and investigation. Even if the person making a claim or advocating a policy is a bad/weird/immoral person, what really matters is whether the claim is true or the policy is correct. Lots of people on this board attack/defend the person (which often is easy) rather than the claim/policy.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

More explicit, genuine and unflinching penance for past mistakes in this single two-minute video than most media figures offer in their entire careers: https://t.co/ew3cxBb3Cj

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 16, 2023

I understand the maximum contempt that will come with posting this lol..have at it.

---

So he admits he was wrong before. Why do you trust him now?

dimitrig said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

More explicit, genuine and unflinching penance for past mistakes in this single two-minute video than most media figures offer in their entire careers: https://t.co/ew3cxBb3Cj

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 16, 2023

I understand the maximum contempt that will come with posting this lol..have at it.

---

So he admits he was wrong before. Why do you trust him now?

---

Can you post a screenshot of a man who's never wrong?

MinotStateBeav said:

---

dimitrig said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

More explicit, genuine and unflinching penance for past mistakes in this single two-minute video than most media figures offer in their entire careers: https://t.co/ew3cxBb3Cj

— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 16, 2023

I understand the maximum contempt that will come with posting this lol..have at it.

---

So he admits he was wrong before. Why do you trust him now?

---

Can you post a screenshot of a man who's never wrong?

---

I can post one of a man who is always wrong:

I will add that being right about those things when the conventional wisdom was so wrong greatly damaged Krugman's career because of the forces unleashed against him to discredit him in any way imaginable for every mistake he ever made.

A great example of why Tucker Carlson is the best pundit on cable TV, this is arguably the best commentary I have seen on the modern decline of the American economy:



Most liberals on this board behave in a compulsive, tribal manner and are practically incapable of acknowledging that this kind of penetrating coverage by Carlson actually is outstanding.

They also don't understand that Carlson is at deep odds with the Murdochs and the Fox management, who are squarely on the side of the Paul Singers and the GOP politicians in his pocket.

Carlson has also been consistently at odds with the Lindseys, Cottons and other neocon creeps that have infested the GOP since Dubya's crowd took it over. Instead of praising him for this, the average liberal will side with the compulsive warmongers on Syria or the Ukraine.

I disagree with Carlson about China and a few other topics, but overall he's still the best cable pundit, by a wide margin.

Cal88 said:

---

A great example of why Tucker Carlson is the best pundit on cable TV, this is arguably the best commentary I have seen on the modern decline of the American economy:



Most liberals on this board behave in a compulsive, tribal manner and are practically incapable to acknowledge that this kind of penetrating coverage by Carlson actually is outstanding.

They also don't understand that Carlson is at deep odds with the Murdochs and the Fox management, who are squarely on the side of the Paul Singers and the GOP politicians in his pocket.

Carlson has also been consistently at odds with the Lindseys, Cottons and other neocon creeps that have infested the GOP since Dubya's crowd took it over. Instead of praising him for this, the average liberal will side with the compulsive warmongers on Syria or the Ukraine.

I disagree with Carlson about China and a few other topics, but overall he's still the best cable pundit, by a wide margin.

---

That makes sense. You and Tucker Carlson have a lot in common

A Tucker Carlson text on Trump’s 4 years. Quote: “ We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest. But come on. There really isn’t an upside to Trump.” Unquote. He lied and lied. Still lying for ratings

— Richard De Jong (@Richard80988913) March 8, 2023

dajo9 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

A great example of why Tucker Carlson is the best pundit on cable TV, this is arguably the best commentary I have seen on the modern decline of the American economy:



Most liberals on this board behave in a compulsive, tribal manner and are practically incapable to acknowledge that this kind of penetrating coverage by Carlson actually is outstanding.

They also don't understand that Carlson is at deep odds with the Murdochs and the Fox management, who are squarely on the side of the Paul Singers and the GOP politicians in his pocket.

Carlson has also been consistently at odds with the Lindseys, Cottons and other neocon creeps that have infested the GOP since Dubya's crowd took it over. Instead of praising him for this, the average liberal will side with the compulsive warmongers on Syria or the Ukraine.

I disagree with Carlson about China and a few other topics, but overall he's still the best cable pundit, by a wide margin.

---

That makes sense. You and Tucker Carlson have a lot in common

A Tucker Carlson text on Trump’s 4 years. Quote: “ We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest. But come on. There really isn’t an upside to Trump.” Unquote. He lied and lied. Still lying for ratings

— Richard De Jong (@Richard80988913) March 8, 2023

---

Liars, hypocrites, and morons. Which one are you, 88? You can be more than one, even all three.

^Since you've asked, I'm sagittarius, ascendant scorpio.

Do we have to wait till the next passage of Halley's Comet for you to make a somewhat coherent comment with relevant content?

Tucker is a crisis actor for white grievance.

Fox argued in court that he was an actor and not to take him seriously. We also know based on his texts (and those of people around him) that it's all a front and yet we still have disingenuous, bad faith people pretending that the character he plays on TV is reflective of anything other than what he thinks will give him the best monetization off the rubes who form his audience.

But sure, I am not surprised that his radicalized followers think his performances are oscar-worthy.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

Fox argued in court that he was an actor and not to take him seriously.

---

Yep, they used the same defense Maddow used a year prior.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

Fox argued in court that he was an actor and not to take him seriously.

---

Yep, they used the same defense Maddow used a year prior.

---

No they didn't. Maddow did not use that defense. The Maddow judge used similar comments and liars on the right keep repeating that Maddow used Tucker's defense. She did not.

dajo9 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

Fox argued in court that he was an actor and not to take him seriously.

---

Yep, they used the same defense Maddow used a year prior.

---

No they didn't. Maddow did not use that defense. The Maddow judge used similar comments and liars on the right keep repeating that Maddow used Tucker's defense. She did not.

---

Truth stings I see.

dajo9 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

Fox argued in court that he was an actor and not to take him seriously.

---

Yep, they used the same defense Maddow used a year prior.

---

No they didn't. Maddow did not use that defense. The Maddow judge used similar comments and liars on the right keep repeating that Maddow used Tucker's defense. She did not.

---

Truth stings I see.

---

Provide evidence to support your claim

---

Minot: "What is this 'evidence' you keep talking about? I know what I feel, and what Fox News tells me to think, but I don't know nothing about 'evidence'. "

Drew Holden catches Paul Krugman being wrong once again, this time on combating climate change https://t.co/gTOsk73yBT

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 21, 2023

For Dajo




Making Aunbear look like an idiot #458323.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Drew Holden catches Paul Krugman being wrong once again, this time on combating climate change https://t.co/gTOsk73yBT

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 21, 2023

For Dajo




Making Aunbear look like an idiot #458323.

---

Why don't you post the article? Are you afraid context and nuance will make you look stupid again?

Once again for the dim witted and easily duped: evidence comes from reputable sources, not random Twitter accounts nor right wing screamers on YouTube.

Thanks for playing.

AunBear89 said:

---

Once again for the dim witted and easily duped: evidence comes from reputable sources, not random Twitter accounts nor right wing screamers on YouTube.

Thanks for playing.

---

He's reading the article, I choose this because I figured it might be easier for you when he was using big words.

Found this interesting. Remember when Tucker tried to set up a interview with Putin and our intel services put a stop to it...