Ken Burns on why the Republican Party completely changed

11,366 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by BearHunter
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The outcome far from ends Paxton's troubles. He still faces trial on felony securities fraud charges, remains under a separate FBI investigation and is in jeopardy of losing his ability to practice law in Texas because of his baseless attempts to overturn the 2020 election."

https://www.kcra.com/amp/article/ken-paxton-acquitted-impeachment-trial/45169831
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somewhat back to the OP…

Can anyone define what the unifying purpose of the Republican Party was post WW2 and before Reagan, other than being anti-Communist?

Reagan…agree or disagree, he at least articulated a political philosophy.

Post Reagan up to Trump… Who are Republicans? Pro-defense/military, law and order, anti-Communist, pro- Israel, pro-life.

Trump…economic populist, anti-war, very transactional

I know some people (used to include me) still believe it's the party of Reagan with small government and low taxes but their rise to power in Congress fully disproves this, IMO.

Put it all together and you have a couple of underlying themes and a couple of individuals with the gravitas to move the party ideologically.

So why does the party change? Because their most fundamental characteristic is to argue to voters they aren't Democrats. It is the chameleon party…lay low, stay under the radar, don't be Democrats, paint Democrats as extremists. If you don't have core values you change to embrace whoever is popular. That's it, it is that simple.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Democratic Party hasn't remained static either. They are now anti-free speech, anti-Constitution, anti-liberty, anti-America, pro-war, pro-military funding, pro-big corporation, pro-big money politics, and pro-big brother. Obama kept his promise from his inaugural speech when he said "we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America".
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"The outcome far from ends Paxton's troubles. He still faces trial on felony securities fraud charges, remains under a separate FBI investigation and is in jeopardy of losing his ability to practice law in Texas because of his baseless attempts to overturn the 2020 election."

https://www.kcra.com/amp/article/ken-paxton-acquitted-impeachment-trial/45169831

Yeah but where's the evidence?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

The Democratic Party hasn't remained static either. They are now anti-free speech, anti-Constitution, anti-liberty, anti-America, pro-war, pro-military funding, pro-big corporation, pro-big money politics, and pro-big brother. Obama kept his promise from his inaugural speech when he said "we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America".
Not a bad list but you forgot pro-open borders, pro-criminals, pro-racial tensions, and pro-gender chaos, pro-corruption, and pro-engineered election outcomes. Both parties are destroying the country, but one clearly has taken it to another level.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

BearHunter said:

The Democratic Party hasn't remained static either. They are now anti-free speech, anti-Constitution, anti-liberty, anti-America, pro-war, pro-military funding, pro-big corporation, pro-big money politics, and pro-big brother. Obama kept his promise from his inaugural speech when he said "we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America".
Not a bad list but you forgot pro-open borders, pro-criminals, pro-racial tensions, and pro-gender chaos, pro-corruption, and pro-engineered election outcomes. Both parties are destroying the country, but one clearly has taken it to another level.

How could I forget? But I also forgot to add: anti-math, anti-science, anti-police, anti-rule of law, anti-judiciary process, anti-Christian, anti-white hetero-sexual male, anti-reality, and pro-hoax.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Double down on the sock puppetry huh lol
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left has also replaced humor with hate. It seems much of their comedy is hate-based.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comical
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear said:

Zippergate said:

tequila4kapp said:

Zippergate said:

There is very little conservative about the modern Republican Party and I sadly agree with many (most?) of the criticisms of it expressed here. But in a two party system, it's the choice by default because the alternative is completely off the rails. It doesn't matter now because they will win regardless of popular sentiment for the same reason that Maduro always wins. Laugh/gloat now while you have the chance. On the bright side, thanks to Chavism, Venezuelans don't need Ozempic.
But there is something we can do. Remember, both parties fundamentally care about obtaining and retaining power. That is their Achilles heel. As long as people continue to accept that our only choices are the lesser of two evils, nothing changes. We can refuse to vote or we can start voting in different ways. It is just a numbers game...enough of us need to do something different and the two parties will change. IMO Republicans are more likely to change first, mostly because (IMO) they are a rudderless group that mostly doesn't even pretend to have core values any longer.
The answer is, of course, populism. Trump is vulgar, but anyone who despises him because he is "conservative" is just misinformed. He was a Democrat for most of his life and his policies as president were a mishmash of traditionally left and right ideas because deep down he's not an idealogue, he's a pragmatist. But he's a political outsider willing to take on entrenched interests and that is what we need. Don't like Trump? Fine, someone else then. I'd be thrilled if he would leave the political stage if we could replace him with someone with similar energy and will to break the Uniparty stranglehold.

Rather than hate on the populists in the Republican Party, it would be great if sensible liberals would form their own populist coalition and push back against the insanity. Even better if they'd find common cause with right-leaning populists, bring the whole thing to the center where most Americans are, and cleanse the system of the Uniparty.

I'm sure all of this is totally repugnant to most here who identify as Team Blue. But I ask you, would any of you be willing to vote for a Republican? I'd vote for RFK Jr in a heartbeat (even though we have quite different world views) because I think he is an honest man who won't sell out to the establishment. He's the quintessential 60's liberal so I find it fascinating that he is attacked primarily from the left, not the right. It's also interesting that he shares a number of views that align with Trump populists. It's because the Democratic Party has abandoned their raison d'etre and become a cabal of semi-authoritarian, neocon, kleptocratic social Jacobins.

As a progressive, I agree but we can do better than RFK junior


Personally (registered Dem and almost always vote Dem), I would absolutely consider voting for a Republican, though, honestly, by election time, I would probably be swayed by things like Supreme Court appointments and end up voting Dem.

But maybe not. The Democratic candidate would have to be unappealing and the Republican candidate would have to have a strong resume and be reasonable (think ideology of somebody like an Arnold Schwarzenegger.). The problem is, reasonable Republicans are being marginalized in their own party. I don't see many left and, if there are some, they would never get the nomination.

I appreciate Liz Cheney's principled stand on democracy, but she is just too far to the right for me, on most issues.

An RFK Jr type would never get my vote. I don't want the leader of the free world to be some whacko. Good God...
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump policies and Charlie Kirk are super popular on America's college campuses. So, us radical leftist Democrats are using hologram technology as a deepfake to create the opposite appearance. Check out this awesome hologram video where we make Charlie Kirk look like an unwelcome fascist. The key thing here is, everybody in the hologram video who looks like a man is actually a woman and everybody who looks like a woman is actually a man. Brilliant.
https://www.threads.net/@vincedmonroy/post/CxY8oxDPf41/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An RFK Jr type would never get my vote. I don't want the leader of the free world to be some whacko. Good God...

I don't remember hearing such vitriol for Bernie Sanders, a true wacko if there ever was one, and it would be hard to find a less-virtuous, less-accomplished person. Or how about Kamala? Perhaps not a whacko, but that might be because no one can figure out what's she's actually saying. And her claim to fame is aggressively prosecuting POC for petty crimes. How is that okay in a world where presentism rules the day?

What is it about RFK Jr that the authoritarian Left finds so offensive?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very true. Kamala is deeply unpopular for her role in reducing crime in California to the lowest levels in the last 50 years. We have created another hologram video deepfake to make Kamala look popular. A near impossible task. Check it out.
https://www.threads.net/@yagirlkat/post/CxYiMp4rF6m/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Very true. Kamala is deeply unpopular for her role in reducing crime in California to extremely low levels. We have created another hologram video deepfake to make Kamala look popular. A near impossible task. Check it out.
https://www.threads.net/@yagirlkat/post/CxYiMp4rF6m/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
If that is the case, then she is far too important a person to be off in Washington. We need her in California RIGHT NOW! I'm sure Willy Brown will be happy to put her to work.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately it is true that Kamala Harris was AG in California when she drove crime down to a 50 year low. We all know that Republicans love crime, hence their unhappiness with Harris. But, it's a little more complicated than you make it. Joe Biden has stolen billions of dollars, as you know. It is getting harder and harder to hide all the mountains of evidence from the noble and unbiased investigators of the Freedom Caucus. Kamala may become President sooner rather than later.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://thepostmillennial.com/militant-black-nationalist-found-guilty-of-manslaughter-in-execution-of-florida-police-officer

Where'd he get these ideas? Where'd the jury get theirs? And who inspired the judges and lawyers to allow this to happen?
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Unfortunately it is true that Kamala Harris was AG in California when she drove crime down to a 50 year low. We all know that Republicans love crime, hence their unhappiness with Harris. But, it's a little more complicated than you make it. Joe Biden has stolen billions of dollars, as you know. It is getting harder and harder to hide all the mountains of evidence from the noble and unbiased investigators of the Freedom Caucus. Kamala may become President sooner rather than later.

Is the 50 year low crime rate true? If so, I suppose the current AG should take a page out of Kamala's playbook and look into aggressively prosecuting POC for petty crimes?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The future will be different. White people will be ushered into the criminal justice system.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats on a roll, winning elections. Cheating sure does work.
Hahahahaha
https://www.axios.com/2023/09/21/democrats-special-elections-winning-streak
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

The future will be different. White people will be ushered into the criminal justice system.
The country is becoming more brown, Biden said so.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Democrats on a roll, winning elections. Cheating sure does work.
Hahahahaha
https://www.axios.com/2023/09/21/democrats-special-elections-winning-streak
Democrats are good at stealing elections.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

Democrats on a roll, winning elections. Cheating sure does work.
Hahahahaha
https://www.axios.com/2023/09/21/democrats-special-elections-winning-streak
Democrats are good at stealing elections.


You got that right. Trumpers are like the keystone cops. We are on a roll.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

Democrats on a roll, winning elections. Cheating sure does work.
Hahahahaha
https://www.axios.com/2023/09/21/democrats-special-elections-winning-streak
Democrats are good at stealing elections.
You got that right. Trumpers are like the keystone cops. We are on a roll.
Democrats also got plenty of help from RINOS in red states. I'm thankful the emergence of Trump exposed many of them
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.


Our sex life is our business
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
Our sex life is our business
Trump is too busy to think about your bedroom.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
Our sex life is our business
Trump is too busy to think about your bedroom.


You brought it up
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
Our sex life is our business
Trump is too busy to think about your bedroom.
You brought it up
I didn't say anything about Barry's chef.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
Our sex life is our business
Trump is too busy to think about your bedroom.
You brought it up
I didn't say anything about Barry's chef.


Obama isn't gay. She's a woman.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

dajo9 said:

BearHunter said:

Democrats stab you in the face. RINOS stab you from behind.
Our sex life is our business
Trump is too busy to think about your bedroom.
You brought it up
I didn't say anything about Barry's chef.
Obama isn't gay. She's a woman.
I believe Barry's preferred pronoun is he.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Obama's not a woman. The chef is.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Obama's not a woman. The chef is.
The chef was found with no clothes on. I'm sure it wasn't difficult to determine sex.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're going to have to send you to a retraining camp for sure
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.