Election Interference

11,081 Views | 199 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by bear2034
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Fox News hadn't made payment of $787,000,000 for intentionally telling dirty rotten lies, maybe it would have been a viable option as the host of Debate # 3. Unfortunately, at the present time, Fox News has the same credibility rating as RT.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

It's not a problem that Kamala is friends with the chairwoman <snip>.
Then what was the point of what you posted?
Kamala is good friends with the head honcho at ABC News. This makes more sense than saying Trump is good friends with Putin.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

It's not a problem that Kamala is friends with the chairwoman <snip>.
Then what was the point of what you posted?
Kamala is good friends with the head honcho at ABC News. This makes more sense than saying Trump is good friends with Putin.
You admitted that it wasn't a problem, so apparently you had no point. OK, not unusual for you.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Remember Time magazine's cover in 2021? - The election was...."fortified".
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully, if Kamala wins, Thiel will direct his slander at specific targets and then he, like Fox News, can write a check for $787,000,000+ for telling dirty rotten lies. God knows he's good for it. Free speech gives you the right to lie, but if you are really wealthy, you are going to pay for it, mother f@ucker.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't know, I've been saying the election was stolen the last four years but I haven't gotten a knock on my door yet.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everyone knows that it was an impossibility that 63M Americans voted for tRump in 2016. In 2020 his 74M was laugh out loud.

During the debate he said more than he should have when he said they told him he would need 70-71M votes to win….so "they" gave him a cushion at 74M but he still lost.

tRump went schizoid because the worst stab wound a life long cheater can suffer is when they believe they were out cheated.

It won't happen again. Lesson learned. Watch the THEY'RE EATING THE CATS! man to "get" 82M+ votes in 2024.

*The fact tRump's failure to capture the presidency is an existential threat to Putin makes this scenario close to a certainty.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mass Hysteria said:

The people who actually believe in election interference and insurrection



Note: RMG Research is another name for Rasmussen Polling, so it's not surprising that it's research has an extreme right wing bias.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Extreme right wing bias"?


Oh - just like Yogi Sick puppet!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Mass Hysteria said:

The people who actually believe in election interference and insurrection



Note: RMG Research is another name for Rasmussen Polling, so it's not surprising that it's research has an extreme right wing bias.

Rassmussen Polling have held their own in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, particularly the 2016 when most polls predicted Hillary Clinton as the overwhelming favorite and all the late night talk shows laughed at the idea of Trump having any chance of winning the presidency. You can call them far right if you want but their polling data is more accurate than the competition.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Mass Hysteria said:

The people who actually believe in election interference and insurrection



Note: RMG Research is another name for Rasmussen Polling, so it's not surprising that it's research has an extreme right wing bias.

Rassmussen Polling have held their own in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, particularly the 2016 when most polls predicted Hillary Clinton as the overwhelming favorite and all the late night talk shows laughed at the idea of Trump having any chance of winning the presidency. You can call them far right if you want but their polling data is more accurate than the competition.
In 2020, Rasmussen had the most favorable polling for Trump, having Biden ahead by 1%. All the other the polling had Biden up by at least 4%. Biden won by 4.5%.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Mass Hysteria said:

The people who actually believe in election interference and insurrection



Note: RMG Research is another name for Rasmussen Polling, so it's not surprising that it's research has an extreme right wing bias.

Rassmussen Polling have held their own in both the 2016 and 2020 elections, particularly the 2016 when most polls predicted Hillary Clinton as the overwhelming favorite and all the late night talk shows laughed at the idea of Trump having any chance of winning the presidency. You can call them far right if you want but their polling data is more accurate than the competition.
In 2020, Rasmussen had the most favorable polling for Trump, having Biden ahead by 1%. All the other the polling had Biden up by at least 4%. Biden won by 4.5%.

Biden's "numbers" were inconsistent with other numbers because the Democrats stole the election.



bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you conservative idiots think that is in any way relevant and is at all related to his ability to lead?


Stupid fu&$ing idiots.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

We do you conservative idiots think that is in any way relevant and is at all related to his ability to lead?

Stupid fu&$ing idiots.

Knock knock.
Who's there?
Owen.
Owen who?
0 and 2.

HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?


No evidence!
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You need to watch Silenced.

It might save your hate filled soul.

You watch too much "news" but it's all propaganda.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:



No evidence!
That's not evidence of election fraud. That's evidence of a network graphics glitch.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

They tried to take out Trump, missed, and took out Biden instead.
If Kamala can't bring in enough votes, there's always Plan C.
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I give you props for an original thought. This is a good argument.

It is much better than the regurgitation of MSM propaganda that most of the libs here do
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Right Wing propaganda that all the BI conservaclowns regurgitate is much worse.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?


It has been confirmed via FOIA that Soros has donated boatloads of money worldwide to install nonprosecuting AGs. What will it take to open your eyes and see that your party is corrupted by evil trying to conquer the world.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A) Not my party. Never been a registered Democrat.

B) Elno is your best source? So you prefer oligarchs?

B) Conservatives/Republicans are equally corrupt (actually, they are far more corrupt)
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not a democrat wow…apologize for another assumption. I don't anybody could not assume that from your posts.

Anybody refute or agree with these figures?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Iranian collusion. Iran Iran Iran.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:




Clown car
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:


Clown car
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is not a very well kept secret that 63M Americans did not vote for tRump 2016. It is outright laughable to pretend he got 74M in 2020.*

*tRump inadvertently blurted out during one of the debates that he was told he would need 71M to prevail in 2020. He "covered" that with a "cushion" and still lost. It won't happen again. He'll "find" 85M+ in 2024 and pretend they came from RFK Jr.,Black and Latino voters. In reality he will be lucky if he gets 55M actual votes.

*Naturally, tRump and his gang of morons are incapable of ever pulling of election interference. They rely on others to do that. tRump and his F Troop couldn't even pull off tampering with one juror in his felony x 32 trial….something John Gotti and his son were able to pull off between them 7 or 8 times.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great investigative journalism here from Pro Publica about the secretive Christian billionaire oligarchy group breaking the law (they are tax exempt but doing political work) trying to redirect America through a combination of voter turnout and voter suppression. We have to start enforcing the law on rich people in this country.
https://www.propublica.org/article/inside-ziklag-secret-christian-charity-2024-election
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Election interference thread:

On NPR yesterday I heard that in (Misssissippi?) the law says a mailed in vote is valid if it's postmarked in time yet arrives days later, but the GOP (who will no doubt win the state for Trump) is suing to stop the count on mailed in ballots that arrive after Election Day.

Why? They will win the state!

A: They've chosen this friendly legal venue to establish precedent so they can invalidate in other courts after election night, should the need arise.

What a bunch koksucking motherbuckers! Only interested in getting THEIR way, not democracy.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Election interference thread:

On NPR yesterday I heard that in (Misssissippi?) the law says a mailed in vote is valid if it's postmarked in time yet arrives days later, but the GOP (who will no doubt win the state for Trump) is suing to stop the count on mailed in ballots that arrive after Election Day.

Why? They will win the state!

A: They've chosen this friendly legal venue to establish precedent so they can invalidate in other courts after election night, should the need arise.

What a bunch koksucking motherbuckers! Only interested in getting THEIR way, not democracy.


Southern whites have never supported democracy in the history of our country
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Real criminals.
And every congress person not voting for save
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.