SCOTUS said show us on paper just before the election, Hero Jack Smith delivers

710 Views | 13 Replies | Last: 14 days ago by AunBear89
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/02/politics/jack-smith-donald-trump-filing/index.html


BOOM!

VOTE BLUE
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good read. tRump supporters love this kind of stuff. It is exactly why they support him. They want him to have dictatorial power and rule for life.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Good read. tRump supporters love this kind of stuff. It is exactly why they support him. They want him to have dictatorial power and rule for life.
Hopefully independents not so much
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
11 damning details in Jack Smith's new brief in the Trump election case - POLITICO


https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/02/jack-smith-trump-election-brief-details-00182287
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

11 damning details in Jack Smith's new brief in the Trump election case - POLITICO


https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/02/jack-smith-trump-election-brief-details-00182287
what a comedy of f'ing fools
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAGAts don't believe in democracy. They are fascists.

The news won't be talking about this obviously disqualifying episode in a few days. The high ratings Donold show must go on.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The tweet criticizing Pence coincided with one of the most perilous moments of the riot: the precise minute Pence was being evacuated from his Senate office to a loading dock below the Capitol. Rioters had come within 40 feet of where he was sheltering just before this moment.

When Trump was told by an aide of Pence's evacuation, prosecutors say Trump responded: "So what?"



Too bad Pence didn't get abducted or lynched.
Then we would have really found out how great (or pathetic) this Country has become.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Counting on Giuliani didn't turn out so well. Smith's brief includes yet another instance of Giuliani's prolific record of butt-dialing and clumsy cell phone use. Prosecutors say he attempted to send a proposed resolution to Michigan lawmakers declaring the election to be in dispute but sent it to the wrong number.

Good thing these guys are complete idiots. America, if you elect these scum, you will deserve what will come.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tina Peters, Colorado MAGAt election official, got sentenced to 9 years in prison for helping people illegally access voting data and then being defiant about it after convicted by a jury of her peers.

Justice is slowly on the march.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deep Throat said:



I challenge any of the Trump haters in this thread to substantively address the assertions in Goldsmith's article of Smith and the DOJ's bad faith. He has nailed it.

"These subversions of executive branch standards may seem relatively unimportant and perhaps justified to those who believe that Mr. Trump's violations were and will be much worse, that his crimes and unfitness for office are obvious and that his unique horribleness justifies every conceivable aggressive step to keep him from becoming president. This sort of thinking reflects a tragic eight-year pattern of breaking rules and standards or countenancing breaking them in response to Mr. Trump's disreputable behavior."

The irony, of course, is that the Dems/liberals have done the authoritarian and norm breaking things they accuse Trump of.

If Trump wins and he elects to engage in the same unfortunate tactics used against him, the Dems will l only have themselves to blame and will have no grounds to complain.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

Deep Throat said:



I challenge any of the Trump haters in this thread to substantively address the assertions in Goldsmith's article of Smith and the DOJ's bad faith. He has nailed it.

"These subversions of executive branch standards may seem relatively unimportant and perhaps justified to those who believe that Mr. Trump's violations were and will be much worse, that his crimes and unfitness for office are obvious and that his unique horribleness justifies every conceivable aggressive step to keep him from becoming president. This sort of thinking reflects a tragic eight-year pattern of breaking rules and standards or countenancing breaking them in response to Mr. Trump's disreputable behavior."

The irony, of course, is that the Dems/liberals have done the authoritarian and norm breaking things they accuse Trump of.

If Trump wins and he elects to engage in the same unfortunate tactics used against him, the Dems will l only have themselves to blame and will have no grounds to complain.
Meh, this article is better applied to James Comey's actions in 2016
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi Sock Puppet said:



"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happy Roevember said:

Lawfare is officially over. Done.



Jack Smith, you're fired.


AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And you morons know well: the lawfare is only gonna get bigger and more contrived when the Trump DOJ gets rolling.

I suspect the vetting process for AG will be along the lines of "How would you prosecute this list of President Trump's enemies within?"
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.