Worst candidate

5,347 Views | 115 Replies | Last: 18 days ago by bear2034
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol at the old white men who are so far behind the times
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lol at the old white men who are so far behind the times
you lose if all you can do is name call ..sort of like Harris
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK Boomer
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anybody who does not label Trump as such does not deserve to be taken seriously.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
You 'bout this from your candidate?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-weirdly-simulates-sex-act-on-microphone-stand/

OMG

VOTE BLUE and get your head out of your a z z
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

She's a puppet for left wing extremism and authoritarianism.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


She's a puppet for left wing extremism and authoritarianism.
she ain't creepy like your team:




VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's interesting that Trump doesn't have a nickname for Kamala like he usually has with all his opponents. What about Drunk Kamala?

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

It's interesting that Trump doesn't have a nickname for Kamala like he usually has with all his opponents. What about Drunk Kamala?


His aides say no

https://www.thedailybeast.com/aides-talked-trump-out-of-new-offensive-nickname-for-biden/

VOTE BLUE
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Anybody who does not label Trump as such does not deserve to be taken seriously.

They are unserious clowns who unfortunately vote.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lol at the old white men who are so far behind the times

White Dudes for Harris?
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It looks more like Trump's base.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
This is a delusional and ill informed take.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
This is a delusional and ill informed take.


+1000
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
This is a delusional and ill informed take.

A bunch of white guys, pretending to be Christians, screaming and getting violent over non white people?

Sounds like the garden variety MAGAt to me. Or, were you implying that his real base is that room full of millionaires and billionaires that he promised to make a lot of money with tax cuts? Yeah, maybe that's his base.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
This is a delusional and ill informed take.

And can we assume, given your predictable response, that you believe the original post to be clear eyed and well informed? That a bunch of KKK members from likely the 1940s is going to vote for a woman. A brown skinned woman?

If you honestly believe that, you are as stupid as 003.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
Yup, Proud Boy and Klan is the MAGAt base. Need to root them out.

VOTE BLUE
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

tequila4kapp said:

AunBear89 said:

It looks more like Trump's base.
This is a delusional and ill informed take.

And can we assume, given your predictable response, that you believe the original post to be clear eyed and well informed? That a bunch of KKK members from likely the 1940s is going to vote for a woman. A brown skinned woman?

If you honestly believe that, you are as stupid as 003.


Are you trying for a record on personal attacks? You certainly can't quit me.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for your engagement. Remember to "Like" and subscribe.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup, the worst

She is up against the guy that biden crushed and losing bigtime

So we are stuck with the orange man,
NVBear78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lol at the old white men who are so far behind the times


So you laugh at him. But do you think Harris was a good candidate? She is terrible and insufferable to listen to at all. Trump has a lot of warts but she is pathetic.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan


Harris and McCain were weak but not as weak as Bob Dole
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
That and for some reason, there are men that will not vote for a woman. Trump went for them and it really resonated, across races.

VOTE BLUE
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Lol at the old white men who are so far behind the times

Post of the Day.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biggest impediment to Harris' presidency?
Her gender.

Americans go deep.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan


You must be a genius.
Such insightful analysis.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan


Harris and McCain were weak but not as weak as Bob Dole


No.
Bob Dole was 10x better than Donald Trump!!!
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
Nope.

She was deeply unpopular as VP. She ran a terrible campaign, dodging media and the press, with no real message other than "Trump is bad." She didn't distance herself from Biden (and her own) bad policies. She never explained her massive changes in position and in fact lied about that in many cases. She was a bad retail politician. And then she was anointed by the dem oligarchs - the same people who hid Biden's condition - without any type of primary.

She, like Biden before her, thought hiding and "not being Trump" would be enough. It was not.

Had the dems run a better candidate - Manchin, Newsome, Shapiro, or others - they likely would have won. I would have voted for Manchin and likely Shapiro. Instead they ran the deeply unpopular, not bright, and farthest left candidate they could find.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

dimitrig said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
Harris and McCain were weak but not as weak as Bob Dole
No.
Bob Dole was 10x better than Donald Trump!!!
Bob Dole went against a popular incumbent, Trump could have repeated the 1984 election if his campaign didn't goof around after the Biden debate, that is how bad Harris was
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.

That, and the fact that she has a vagina, breasts, and dark skin.
I mean, let's be real. America is not so deep.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
Nope.

She was deeply unpopular as VP. She ran a terrible campaign, dodging media and the press, with no real message other than "Trump is bad." She didn't distance herself from Biden (and her own) bad policies. She never explained her massive changes in position and in fact lied about that in many cases. She was a bad retail politician. And then she was anointed by the dem oligarchs - the same people who hid Biden's condition - without any type of primary.

She, like Biden before her, thought hiding and "not being Trump" would be enough. It was not.

Had the dems run a better candidate - Manchin, Newsome, Shapiro, or others - they likely would have won. I would have voted for Manchin and likely Shapiro. Instead they ran the deeply unpopular, not bright, and farthest left candidate they could find.


I don't think "farthest left" was what they were looking for. They wanted a black woman in 2020. That got her the job.

After that she got it because she was the VP and being on the ticket had access to the donations. It also made it more palatable to say "Well, you voted for Biden AND Harris" so she did get your vote. Biden is old so it could have happened organically anyway.

There is nothing about today's Dem party that is embracing the farthest left at all. They are very centrist. She wouldn't have been the pick if not for being the VP already.

BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

BearGoggles said:

wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
Nope.

She was deeply unpopular as VP. She ran a terrible campaign, dodging media and the press, with no real message other than "Trump is bad." She didn't distance herself from Biden (and her own) bad policies. She never explained her massive changes in position and in fact lied about that in many cases. She was a bad retail politician. And then she was anointed by the dem oligarchs - the same people who hid Biden's condition - without any type of primary.

She, like Biden before her, thought hiding and "not being Trump" would be enough. It was not.

Had the dems run a better candidate - Manchin, Newsome, Shapiro, or others - they likely would have won. I would have voted for Manchin and likely Shapiro. Instead they ran the deeply unpopular, not bright, and farthest left candidate they could find.


I don't think "farthest left" was what they were looking for. They wanted a black woman in 2020. That got her the job.

After that she got it because she was the VP and being on the ticket had access to the donations. It also made it more palatable to say "Well, you voted for Biden AND Harris" so she did get your vote. Biden is old so it could have happened organically anyway.

There is nothing about today's Dem party that is embracing the farthest left at all. They are very centrist. She wouldn't have been the pick if not for being the VP already.


Obama and the rest of the Dem politburo called the shots. They could have picked anyone or simply called for a primary/convention vote. They wanted Kamala and she was/is as far left as they come. The dems had a chance to go a different direction and didn't.

Obama wanted Kamala because, like Biden, he would be able to control her (Susan Rice and her crew have been running the country).

And your take that the dem/Kamala platform is "centrist" is as out of step as many of your other California bubble takes.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

dimitrig said:

BearGoggles said:

wifeisafurd said:

Oakbear said:

I Have been following politics since 1952 when my dad bought a tv so we could watch the conventios, up late at night

Before harris i thought mccain was the weakest candidate but harris is much worse, a shame as i am not a big trump fan
She had very little time to campaign. She did well considering, and if she had more time, I suspect she wins. When they do a post-mortem, I suspect the take away ends-up being covering-up Biden's health issues sunk the election for the Dems.
Nope.

She was deeply unpopular as VP. She ran a terrible campaign, dodging media and the press, with no real message other than "Trump is bad." She didn't distance herself from Biden (and her own) bad policies. She never explained her massive changes in position and in fact lied about that in many cases. She was a bad retail politician. And then she was anointed by the dem oligarchs - the same people who hid Biden's condition - without any type of primary.

She, like Biden before her, thought hiding and "not being Trump" would be enough. It was not.

Had the dems run a better candidate - Manchin, Newsome, Shapiro, or others - they likely would have won. I would have voted for Manchin and likely Shapiro. Instead they ran the deeply unpopular, not bright, and farthest left candidate they could find.


I don't think "farthest left" was what they were looking for. They wanted a black woman in 2020. That got her the job.

After that she got it because she was the VP and being on the ticket had access to the donations. It also made it more palatable to say "Well, you voted for Biden AND Harris" so she did get your vote. Biden is old so it could have happened organically anyway.

There is nothing about today's Dem party that is embracing the farthest left at all. They are very centrist. She wouldn't have been the pick if not for being the VP already.


Obama and the rest of the Dem politburo called the shots. They could have picked anyone or simply called for a primary/convention vote. They wanted Kamala and she was/is as far left as they come. The dems had a chance to go a different direction and didn't.

Obama wanted Kamala because, like Biden, he would be able to control her (Susan Rice and her crew have been running the country).

And your take that the dem/Kamala platform is "centrist" is as out of step as many of your other California bubble takes.


They were worried about being able to use the donations.

Give me a break. Obama and Fidel Castro. Two peas in a pod, amirite?



Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.