The Official SBGold Is Losing Her Mind Thread

1,472 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 18 days ago by SBGold
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If SBGOLD losing her mind is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold is losing her mind, and Yogi his McHandle.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

If SBGOLD losing her mind is wrong, I don't want to be right.
So the both of you lost your minds then.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform

VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

GoOskie said:

If SBGOLD losing her mind is wrong, I don't want to be right.
So the both of you lost your minds then.
I'm not the one who constantly posts in support of a wannabe fascist lunatic.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I campaign for those trying to make America better.

Hell, I saw a clip posted on OT of a Republican challenger Lily tearing apart an elitist opponent. I gave Lily props.

VOTE BLUE
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cheney won't be anywhere near Harris's administration.

VOTE BLUE
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He said this his whole time in his term about health care then also. He was never smart enough to put anything together.

VOTE BLUE
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:


all dudes matter! All Dudes for Harris!

VOTE BLUE
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform
VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://ls.berkeley.edu/news/can-you-%E2%80%98undo%E2%80%99-political-polarization-left-and-right-might-be-closer-we-think-study-finds


~ originally written for The Emotions - rock on with yer bad selves . . .





bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat Onions said:



Whoopi Goldberg is having an orgasm on live TV.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Democrat Onions said:



Whoopi Goldberg is having an orgasm on live TV.
Say no to Cheneys.

VOTE BLUE
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform
VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform
VOTE BLUE
If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?
What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.



The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE

Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Harris wins, the Far Left Progressive wing of the Democratic Party will be as dead and buried as tRumpism and Moderate Democrats will reign supreme with only Moderate Republicans having any chance to unseat them.
In other words this would become a 24/7 thing for eternity:


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's time to make history happen.

And end some bad eras.

VOTE BLUE
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

It time to make history happen.
And end some bad eras.
whoa, busy-busy day, a loong sludge,, thanks SBG!
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.

About disinformation: Disinformation coming from the foreign adversaries and being spread by BI MAGAts, no thanks

[url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html][/url]https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html

It's part of the MAGAt playbook, intel agencies doing a lot of warning about this.

Don't buy into disinformation.

VOTE BLUE
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:





Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.

About disinformation: Disinformation coming from the foreign adversaries and being spread by BI MAGAts, no thanks

[url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html][/url]https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html

It's part of the MAGAt playbook, intel agencies doing a lot of warning about this.

Don't buy into disinformation.

VOTE BLUE


Disinformation also comes from big pharma. It also comes from Kamala Harris' political campaign in its attacks on Trump and throttling of negative information about Kamala. I am glad you are so supportive of SCOTUS. Even if you believe in abortion, you must therefore be a firm believer in a state's rights to make it is own health and safety laws, such as restricting or enabling abortion.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.


Are you talking about what the Federal Government did in 2020 when Dementia Donold was President?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB

Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.


They broke the First Amendment.

Most of what was deemed "disinformation" about covid turned out to be true. Covid is a synthetic lab product created through gain of function research, and not a Wuhan wet market organic outbreak, as Fauci et al wanted us to believe, while he knew it wasn't the case.

The truth about the lab origins of covid was heavily censored, and that censorship was obviously not "in the interest of public health".

Clamoring for further censorship of that kind in 2024 is beyond pathetic.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB

Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.


They broke the First Amendment.

Most of what was deemed "disinformation" about covid turned out to be true. Covid is a synthetic lab product created through gain of function research, and not a Wuhan wet market organic outbreak, as Fauci et al wanted us to believe, while he knew it wasn't the case.

The truth about the lab origins of covid was heavily censored, and that censorship was obviously not "in the interest of public health".

Clamoring for further censorship of that kind in 2024 is beyond pathetic.


You must be upset about Dementia Donold doing that in 2020
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB

Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.


They broke the First Amendment.

Most of what was deemed "disinformation" about covid turned out to be true. Covid is a synthetic lab product created through gain of function research, and not a Wuhan wet market organic outbreak, as Fauci et al wanted us to believe, while he knew it wasn't the case.

The truth about the lab origins of covid was heavily censored, and that censorship was obviously not "in the interest of public health".

Clamoring for further censorship of that kind in 2024 is beyond pathetic.

You must be upset about Dementia Donold doing that in 2020

I'm not a partisan hack, I will and have called out censorship whatever the source.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a word salad. Get on your meds

VOTE BLUE and DONATE BLUE
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

SBGold said:

I don't mind the right wingers posting here. It's a free country that is better when we listen to and are exposed to multiple ideas.

Plus, it opens up more avenues through their posts to inform and post links to donate to ACTBlue:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKtys6D59vJBpLs4XwSlkC2QXDNCzSMnDOZfITUOu6w2gxHNaqsfgYaAmjREALw_wcB

Donate BLUE and VOTE BLUE



If you don't mind multiple viewpoints, why do you campaign for those who advocate censorship?

What makes you think Trump is in favor of multiple viewpoints? Try posting pro Harris info on Truth Social and see how long that lasts.


The Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
SCOTUS sided with Biden administration. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-social-media-biden-administration-453b6ae8794548f960c4ebf72a534aff

Fight the disinformation from MAGAts.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB


Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af.
You must be kidding, it is entirely likely that Trump admin funneled millions to overseas adversaries (Russians) to spread all sorts of disinformation. We are not fooled. Facts are facts, a Trump-filled SCOTUS sided with with the Biden administration.

VOTE BLUE and donate here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB

Again, the Biden Kamala organization is the only presidential administration who has spent considerable resources pressuring tech to hide dissenting viewpoints. Trump didn't do this to nearly the same extent as Biden and Kamala, if at all. I couldn't care less about a Republican alt social network and its leadership moderating viewpoints. I care more about what the government is doing. Biden and Kamala are shady af. I didn't say anything about the Supreme Court. Thanks.
They protected the public from disinformation regarding Covid. In the interest of public health. They did it lawfully, they should be praised.


They broke the First Amendment.

Most of what was deemed "disinformation" about covid turned out to be true. Covid is a synthetic lab product created through gain of function research, and not a Wuhan wet market organic outbreak, as Fauci et al wanted us to believe, while he knew it wasn't the case.

The truth about the lab origins of covid was heavily censored, and that censorship was obviously not "in the interest of public health".

Clamoring for further censorship of that kind in 2024 is beyond pathetic.

You must be upset about Dementia Donold doing that in 2020

I'm not a partisan hack, I will and have called out censorship whatever the source.


Have you? Do you? In equal measure?

No
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:



Have you? Do you? In equal measure?

No
Nope, he never has.

VOTE BLUE
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

dajo9 said:



Have you? Do you? In equal measure?

No
Nope, he never has.

SNIFF GLUE



https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/123692/replies/2408969
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.