Issues with 2024 Election (all in one thread) Pls keep it just information

6,126 Views | 135 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by bear2034
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:



Georgia


I am confused. Today is election day. If there are 3,000 ballots they need to be accepted.

If they haven't been received then how do they know there are 3,000?

Sorry, I didn't read the article.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump has conceded that he lost Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@threads_nyt_pitchbot/post/DCAak4EvuAT?xmt=AQGzjzieKX3aVeTpXGPBrsng6lZzTZhnu1Wm6fX3j3Pr0w
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Trump has conceded that he lost Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@threads_nyt_pitchbot/post/DCAak4EvuAT?xmt=AQGzjzieKX3aVeTpXGPBrsng6lZzTZhnu1Wm6fX3j3Pr0w


Love to watch him sweat!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Trump has conceded that he lost Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@threads_nyt_pitchbot/post/DCAak4EvuAT?xmt=AQGzjzieKX3aVeTpXGPBrsng6lZzTZhnu1Wm6fX3j3Pr0w

Obama said we won't know until much later. But why?
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

dajo9 said:

Trump has conceded that he lost Pennsylvania
https://www.threads.net/@threads_nyt_pitchbot/post/DCAak4EvuAT?xmt=AQGzjzieKX3aVeTpXGPBrsng6lZzTZhnu1Wm6fX3j3Pr0w

Obama said we won't know until much later. But why?


Because the polls haven't even closed yet?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It doesn't take days to count ballots in the battleground states when other nation-states can count them the same day.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

It doesn't take days to count ballots in the battleground states when other nation-states can count them the same day.


People in other nation states don't litigate every damn election result they don't like.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're just talking about counting ballots.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats Suck said:






Unreal turnout is GREAT for Harris.

Let's go BLUE

VOTE BLUE
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bearister's imaginary Russian friends at it again.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Georgia - space heaters, fried electrical
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Trump is going to take Georgia, also showing gains in NH.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Looks like Trump is going to take Georgia, also showing gains in NH.

Not so fast....
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Wisconsin - Absentee ballot recount
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats Suck said:








I am not a millenial but I don't have a signature.

It is different every time.

Who cares?

What a dumb way to authenticate someone.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am not a millenial but I don't have a signature.


It is different every time.

Who cares?

What a dumb way to authenticate someone.

Totally agree. How about we verify identification like they do at Costco, airlines, bars, the DMV etc etc? Just might be crazy enough to work.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not looking good for Trump. 80%++ for Harris in Philadelphia. Yeah right. It's Joever. All Hail President Harris.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Not looking good for Trump. 80%++ for Harris in Philadelphia. Yeah right. It's Joever. All Hail President Harris.


Trump is ahead in Pennsylvania with 50% reporting

But it may not send Harris over even if she wins it

Michigan and Wisconsin look worse than Harris might like

Trump is generally over performing in the swing states, only by a little, but a little is enough.

Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wayne Country (Detroit) went 68% to Biden. Currently 93% for Harris.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:




Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:


Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.
Choose your poison, incompetence or malice. She had one job and her numbers were way off.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:




Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.


I agree. There is no reason to think she would sacrifice a pristine reputation earned over many years for one poll, in a state where it would make no difference. She published her data - probably with some doubts. No reason to attack her for it.

I do think scorn is appropriate for the press who ran with a clearly outlying poll. They were knowingly dishonest in turning one clearly questionable poll into a narrative about all polls.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:




Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.


I agree. There is no reason to think she would sacrifice a pristine reputation earned over many years for one poll, in a state where it would make no difference. She published her data - probably with some doubts. No reason to attack her for it.

I do think scorn is appropriate for the press who ran with a clearly outlying poll. They were knowingly dishonest in turning one clearly questionable poll into a narrative about all polls.

I don't know. Trump is leading Iowa by 14 points, she had Kamala by 3, that's a 17 point swing. If you truly think your opponent is Hitler, wouldn't you risk your own reputation?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

BearGoggles said:

dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:




Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.


I agree. There is no reason to think she would sacrifice a pristine reputation earned over many years for one poll, in a state where it would make no difference. She published her data - probably with some doubts. No reason to attack her for it.

I do think scorn is appropriate for the press who ran with a clearly outlying poll. They were knowingly dishonest in turning one clearly questionable poll into a narrative about all polls.

I don't know. Trump is leading Iowa by 14 points, she had Kamala by 3, that's a 17 point swing. If you truly think your opponent is Hitler, wouldn't you risk your own reputation?

A poll released a few days before an election is not going to change any votes.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

BearGoggles said:

dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:




Why is it always a conspiracy with you people? Maybe she just did a bad job. Maybe it was an incredibly outlying sample of people she polled. Lots of possibilities.


I agree. There is no reason to think she would sacrifice a pristine reputation earned over many years for one poll, in a state where it would make no difference. She published her data - probably with some doubts. No reason to attack her for it.

I do think scorn is appropriate for the press who ran with a clearly outlying poll. They were knowingly dishonest in turning one clearly questionable poll into a narrative about all polls.

I don't know. Trump is leading Iowa by 14 points, she had Kamala by 3, that's a 17 point swing. If you truly think your opponent is Hitler, wouldn't you risk your own reputation?

A poll released a few days before an election is not going to change any votes.
It sure made the Democrats very excited though.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

In Maricopa County, Arizona where ballots are still being counted, officials are claiming they cannot stop third party ballot harvesting, with one stating, "It's not our job to police that."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the RNC leadership wasn't replaced, the election apparatus in battleground states would not have been challenged during this election. Replacing Ronna McDaniel (Mitt Romney's niece) with Laura Trump was crucial.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Attorneys in PA are standing by to contest thanks to the RNC.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MAXIMUM sentences for these people. Remember the DOJ's creative use of the Hatch Act on General Flynn? Or the absurd obstruction of an official proceeding charges used against Jan 6 protestors? This is the kind of aggressive prosecution that Trump needs to pursue against these criminals who have attempted to overthrow democracy (and in this case were successful). I want FBI raids, no bail, solitary confinement, going after relatives, the whole nine yards. These people need the Ryan Salame treatment.



 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.