https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump-keeps-trolling-as-the-resistance-fades-appointments-confirmations-cope-a6a8bd40?st=RYaXsQ&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
DiabloWags said:
Spot on again.
DiabloWags said:
Spot on again.
Lanhee Chen exposes MSNBC for its hypocrisy regarding Trump’s appointment of RFK to lead HHS.
— End Tribalism in Politics (@EndTribalism) November 17, 2024
“Let's not forget — we had a nominee for HHS secretary in THIS administration who had never dealt with health care before being nominated.”
“So he had experience suing healthcare… pic.twitter.com/57SUzjXMHE
I typically agree with Peggy and always enjoy reading her articles. But she's got a real blind spot on this one.DiabloWags said:
The first wave of nominees to the Trump administration announced this week included normal RepublicansSusie Wiles as chief of staff, Elise Stefanik as ambassador to the United Nations, Lee Zeldin at the Environmental Protection Agency, Marco Rubio as secretary of state. All are grown-up players who have political histories that preceded Donald Trump and became fully MAGA.
But the second waveit is impossible to tell if Mr. Trump is announcing appointments or trolling his enemies. Pete Hegseth as defense secretary? This is unserious and deeply alarming. He is a decorated military veteran with Ivy League degrees, but he has no serious governmental or managerial experience, no history of international accomplishment. The Pentagon is a mammoth bureaucracy overseeing almost three million employees, including those in the military services. The defense secretary is a world leader: If North Korea launched a nuclear missile, he would be in the room with the president, advising and counseling. In the past 10 years Mr. Hegseth has made his living as a breakfast TV host and culture warrior. This isn't the right fit. At this point in his life Mr. Hegseth, 44, lacks the stature and depth required of the role.
As for Matt Gaetz being nominated as attorney general well, this is just straight-out trolling, right? The four-term Florida congressman has won a reputation as disruptive, divisive, aggressive, lacking in groundedness and wisdom, and dogged by ethics allegations. He seems to see politics as an offshoot of showbiz and has entertained his followers with successive attempts to take down GOP leaders in the House, on behalf ofwell, it's never quite clear. This we need in America's top law-enforcement official?
The choice obviously isn't meant to reassure anyone outside the MAGA baseor even those within it who are intelligent. It is an insolent appointment, guaranteed to cause trouble and meant to cause friction.
We are back to the Island of Misfit Toys. What a mistake. Mr. Trump often confuses his own antic malice for daring, his own unseriousness for boldness. How amazing that in the rosy glow of election, he will spend so much political capital and goodwill on confirmation fights he may well, and certainly deserves to, lose.
- - - Peggy Noonan for the WSJ, Nov. 16, 2024
DiabloWags said:
As for Matt Gaetz being nominated as attorney general well, this is just straight-out trolling, right? T
- - - Peggy Noonan for the WSJ, Nov. 16, 2024
Going to be very hard for Republican Senators to explain why they voted for Merrick Garland but won’t vote for Matt Gaetz.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 18, 2024
DiabloWags said:
We are back to the Island of Misfit Toys. What a mistake.
- - - Peggy Noonan for the WSJ, Nov. 16, 2024
Please tell us this is NOT Dick "Rachel" Levine --
— National File (@NationalFile) November 19, 2024
soon to be a FORMER HHS official, caught on camera saying a Pagan prayer. pic.twitter.com/vKl1cKlCWD
This is silly. Its not like the Republicans picked Garland over Gaetz. It was Garland (who at the time seemed to be an apolitical centrist but clearly was not) or potentially someone worse.bear2034 said:DiabloWags said:
As for Matt Gaetz being nominated as attorney general well, this is just straight-out trolling, right? T
- - - Peggy Noonan for the WSJ, Nov. 16, 2024Going to be very hard for Republican Senators to explain why they voted for Merrick Garland but won’t vote for Matt Gaetz.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 18, 2024
Why can't Peggy do basic analysis? Some Republican senators might not want to confirm Gaetz but they will have a lot of answering to do.
BearGoggles said:This is silly. Its not like the Republicans picked Garland over Gaetz. It was Garland (who at the time seemed to be an apolitical centrist but clearly was not) or potentially someone worse.bear2034 said:DiabloWags said:
As for Matt Gaetz being nominated as attorney general well, this is just straight-out trolling, right? T
- - - Peggy Noonan for the WSJ, Nov. 16, 2024Going to be very hard for Republican Senators to explain why they voted for Merrick Garland but won’t vote for Matt Gaetz.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 18, 2024
Why can't Peggy do basic analysis? Some Republican senators might not want to confirm Gaetz but they will have a lot of answering to do.
At the same time, the choice now is Gaetz or . . . lots of other good options.
Gaetz blew up the house - for no reason other than personal spite - and did great damage to the house caucas. He put his personal agenda over the good of the party and arguably the country. That alone is enough to vote against him. Not to mention the other allegations that are swirling around him which may or may not be true.
— Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) November 16, 2024