Adding 4.5 trillion to the debt ceiling

538 Views | 10 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by concordtom
CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the winning and efficiency you told us about?
Speaking of efficiency have we seen a single shred of evidence of any of the "inefficiencies"?
The 150 year old man collecting social security? What was his name? Where were the checks going?
As soon as puts are available on TSLA for January 2029 at a .10 strike I'm putting my life savings in.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The proposed GOP budget has $110 billion dollars for the House Judiciary Committee. How could they possibly need that much money? That's $2.5 billion for each of the 44 committee members!

$90 billion for the Homeland Security Committee? That seems very excessive too, but at least I can what they might possibly spend it on.

Sure doesn't seem like a plan for less government and fiscal restraint.

Republicans fail to read the room once again
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

The proposed GOP budget has $110 billion dollars for the House Judiciary Committee. How could they possibly need that much money? That's $2.5 billion for each of the 44 committee members!

$90 billion for the Homeland Security Committee? That seems very excessive too, but at least I can what they might possibly spend it on.

Sure doesn't seem like a plan for less government and fiscal restraint.

Republicans fail to read the room once again


None of this that MAGA Republicans are doing is about policy. It's about owning the Libs and hiding their own graft and corruption. BI MAGAs are dancing jigs over all the performative nonsense that "owns the Libs". While ignoring the rampant corruption and hypocrisy of their own party.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
talking about liberal politically motivated spending, waste, reducing bureaucracy, etc. looks really nice, but how do you then end-up with a $4.5 trillion increase in the deficit? Perhaps Elon's group might take a look at that
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's the crux of the problem...

They aren't reducing spending to offset the entire tax cut.
And then they (House GOP) rely on an overly optimistic $2.6 Trillion in higher revenues from assumed faster growth.

That's how you get another $4.5 Trillion increase in the national debt.

chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
003vshould be b shortly to defend the proposal any moment now. Because while he totally dislikes Trump, he always deflects for him. (It's obvious he has Democrat Derangement Syndrome.)
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

003vshould be b shortly to defend the proposal any moment now. Because while he totally dislikes Trump, he always deflects for him. (It's obvious he has Democrat Derangement Syndrome.)

I've also noticed that DDS is rampant among the dental surgeon profession.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

003vshould be b shortly to defend the proposal any moment now. Because while he totally dislikes Trump, he always deflects for him. (It's obvious he has Democrat Derangement Syndrome.)
Yes, DDS is not just for Dentists anymore.
CNHTH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

chazzed said:

003vshould be b shortly to defend the proposal any moment now. Because while he totally dislikes Trump, he always deflects for him. (It's obvious he has Democrat Derangement Syndrome.)
Yes, DDS is not just for Dentists anymore.

" Yeah, you said you were an economist several times last night. But really, you're just a dentist."
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I trust zero coming from trump, musk, Foxnews, or anything out of the Republican Party.

It's quite possible that the party has eternally branded itself as liars and unhelpful to the average American to such an extent that we end up getting a long term run of democrat leadership.

And I'm first to say that's not a good thing.

Multiparty government is better than two.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

chazzed said:

003vshould be b shortly to defend the proposal any moment now. Because while he totally dislikes Trump, he always deflects for him. (It's obvious he has Democrat Derangement Syndrome.)

I've also noticed that DDS is rampant among the dental surgeon profession.


Disallowed joke.
This punchline was reserved for Big C.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.