Off Topic
Sponsored by

Official SCOTUS / Trump Administration Thread

6,613 Views | 63 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by GrinandBearit
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Anarchistbear said:

This is your rule of law.
Say bye to Democrat lawfare.

Say hi to Executive Orderfare.
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

bear2034 said:

Anarchistbear said:

This is your rule of law.
Say bye to Democrat lawfare.
Say hi to Executive Orderfare.
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Crazy.
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:




Do you know what the best thing about "good" Blacks like Clarence Thomas, Tim Scott and Thomas Sowell is?

They would chuckle right along with you at that and not think that it is in any manner racist humor……coming from a white boy.

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:



Do you know what the best thing about "good" Blacks like Clarence Thomas, Tim Scott and Thomas Sowell is?

They would chuckle right along with you at that and not think that it is in any manner racist humor.
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

bearister said:

Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissent joined by Justice Sonya Sotomayor that chastised the Supreme Court for once again issuing an emergency order in favor of the Trump administration without the benefit of briefing or oral argument.

The entirety of the majority opinion dealing with Jackson is a pretty solid slap down as these things go. She made some real doozies of statements that tend to paint her as not serious.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Crazy.
For the 'MAGA are figurative book burners crowd', from the linked Hill article:

"The children are required to read or listen to stories like "Prince & Knight" about two male knights who marry each other, and "Love Violet" about two young girls falling in love. Another, "Born Ready: The True Story of a Boy Named Penelope," discusses a biological girl who begins a transition to being a boy.

Teachers were informed that this was mandatory reading, which must be assigned, and that families would not be allowed to opt out. The guidelines for teachers made clear that students had to be corrected if they expressed errant or opposing views of gender. If a child questions how someone born a boy could become a girl, teachers were encouraged to correct the child and declare, "That comment is hurtful!"

Even if a student merely asks, "What's transgender?," teachers are expected to say, "When we're born, people make a guess about our gender and label us 'boy' or 'girl' based on our body parts. Sometimes they're right and sometimes they're wrong."

Teachers were specifically told to "[d]isrupt" thinking or values opposing transgender views.

Many families sought to opt out of these lessons. The school allows for such opt-outs for a variety of reasons, but the Board ruled out withdrawals for these lessons."

This type of stuff is why many people characterize it as indoctrination.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Someday she will figure out that she should have gone with Alito and Thomas on the ghost gun decision.

Supreme Court upholds regulation on "ghost guns" - SCOTUSblog


https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/03/supreme-court-upholds-regulation-of-ghost-guns/

*You can always count on Alito and Thomas to twist the law into a balloon animal to come up with the result their patrons desire.
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After MAGA criticism, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivers for Trump


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/maga-world-criticism-amy-coney-barrett-trump-rcna215622

"I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly," he said at a White House press conference soon after Friday's ruling.

Barrett's majority opinion in the 6-3 ruling along ideological lines, which at least temporarily revived Trump's plan to end automatic birthright citizenship, is a major boost to an administration that has been assailed by courts around the country for its broad and aggressive use of executive power.

Just a few months ago, she faced vitriolic criticism from MAGA influencers and others as she sporadically voted against Trump, including a March decision in which she rejected a Trump administration attempt to avoid paying U.S. Agency for International Development contractors.

One of those outspoken critics, Trump-allied lawyer Mike Davis, suggested that the pressure on Barrett had the desired effect.

"Sometimes feeling the heat helps people see the light," he said in a text message."*

*Now MAGA does the Mob stuff out loud that they used to do in quiet.
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

bear2034 said:


Crazy.
For the 'MAGA are figurative book burners crowd', from the linked Hill article:

"The children are required to read or listen to stories like "Prince & Knight" about two male knights who marry each other, and "Love Violet" about two young girls falling in love. Another, "Born Ready: The True Story of a Boy Named Penelope," discusses a biological girl who begins a transition to being a boy.

Teachers were informed that this was mandatory reading, which must be assigned, and that families would not be allowed to opt out. The guidelines for teachers made clear that students had to be corrected if they expressed errant or opposing views of gender. If a child questions how someone born a boy could become a girl, teachers were encouraged to correct the child and declare, "That comment is hurtful!"

Even if a student merely asks, "What's transgender?," teachers are expected to say, "When we're born, people make a guess about our gender and label us 'boy' or 'girl' based on our body parts. Sometimes they're right and sometimes they're wrong."

Teachers were specifically told to "[d]isrupt" thinking or values opposing transgender views.

Many families sought to opt out of these lessons. The school allows for such opt-outs for a variety of reasons, but the Board ruled out withdrawals for these lessons."

This type of stuff is why many people characterize it as indoctrination.
Sorry you cannot deal with differing views, snowflake. I am sure you are equally outraged with the Ten Commandments being placed in texass public schools.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"President Trump needs the Supreme Court to validate some of his most sweeping exercises of presidential power and to stretch or outright overturn some of its own precedents in order to do so, Axios' Sam Baker reports.

The Supreme Court is set to hear three big Trump cases in its new term, which begins next week challenges to his tariffs, his firing of a Federal Trade Commission member and his attempt to fire Fed governor Lisa Cook.

The precedents* standing in Trump's way are conservative ones.

The right's long, successful campaign to curtail presidents' domestic powers is on a collision course with Trump's wrecking-ball presidency.

Where it stands: When President Biden tried to impose an eviction moratorium during COVID, and then to forgive student loans, the Supreme Court said those policies ran afoul of the "major questions doctrine."

Presidents can't implement policies that have "vast economic and political significance" unless they have explicit authorization from Congress, the Supreme Court said then.

That same legal reasoning should also sink Trump's tariffs, a federal appeals court ruled this summer.


What's next: The 6-3 court repeatedly has sided with Trump in his efforts to fire federal workers and signaled it may want to go as far as to overturn the precedent that protects leaders of independent agencies."
Axios

The SCOTUS smoke signals have already been sent:

Justice Clarence Thomas says legal precedents are not 'the gospel' - ABC News https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/justice-clarence-thomas-legal-precedents-gospel/story?id=125967044

"Justice Clarence Thomas said the Supreme Court should take a more critical approach to settled precedent, saying decided cases are not "the gospel" and suggesting some may have been based on "something somebody dreamt up and others went along with."

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"The Supreme Court's majority right wing indicated in oral arguments that they think racism is over on the same day that the vice president defended the "I love Hitler" guy, and that the NYT reported that the current administration plans to accept only white, English-speaking refugees."
Radley Balko
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


"The Supreme Court's majority right wing indicated in oral arguments that they think racism is over on the same day that the vice president defended the "I love Hitler" guy, and that the NYT reported that the current administration plans to accept only white, English-speaking refugees."
Radley Balko



bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't think your assault on the Democratic Party extended to that issue, or maybe I just forgot.

How does this fold into Trump's new immigration proposal that favors Whites that he feels face political oppression in their home countries, like Afrikaners and Right Wing Germans? Is there a Babylon Bee hysterical parody of that situation too?

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"They (black people) don't have equal access to the voting system. They're disabled."

- Kentanji Brown Jackson
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


"The Supreme Court's majority right wing indicated in oral arguments that they think racism is over on the same day that the vice president defended the "I love Hitler" guy, and that the NYT reported that the current administration plans to accept only white, English-speaking refugees."
Radley Balko



This is exactly what dajo9 has been saying for years!
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"The Supreme Court spent its latest term sidelining Congress and amassing power for itself and the presidency, Axios' Andrew Pantazi writes.

After the term that ended this week, Congress can no longer insulate regulators from the president, limit political parties' spending, or require race-conscious voting districts.

The justices overturned precedents, second-guessed Congress and brushed aside facts found by lower courts.

Georgetown Law professor Steve Vladeck tells Axios: "The real headline of the current term is, 'Supreme Court rules for itself, 6-3.

Some of the court's most notable recent decisions:

Choosing which parts of the FTC to keep (the powers Congress gave it) and which to shed (the independence Congress designed).

Making it nearly impossible to use the Voting Rights Act to challenge maps diluting Black and Latino voting power.

Striking down limits on coordinated political party spending (which it had upheld in 2001).

Curbing Congress' power to make state officials pay damages for violating federal funding laws.

Letting President Trump keep withholding $4 billion in congressionally appropriated foreign aid, at least for now.

Reality check: The president didn't win everything this term.

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote all three major rulings against Trump: blocking emergency tariffs, sparing Fed governor Lisa Cook (for now), and rejecting the executive order ending birthright citizenship.

What's next: Trump's biggest defeat doubled as the term's loudest warning.

Four justices were willing to say that Trump's birthright citizenship order didn't violate the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all those born in the country.

Georgetown's Vladeck says the fact that a position deemed "outlandish as recently as a decade ago" got four votes will "embolden" the next wave of once-fringe constitutional arguments."
Axios
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Might makes right, it's the Rule of Law
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"If Democrats win the House in November, they plan to keep hammering on the Epstein files because the issue divides Republicans and "makes Trump crazy," a top insider tells us.

Why it matters: In the majority, Democratic committee chairs would hold subpoena power. We're told they plan to make President Trump's family finances one of their top targets, to contrast average Americans' finances with this term's gusher for Trump, his relatives and allies.

These are the chairs-in-waiting for six of the most powerful House committees, and the control they could exert over CEOs and other business leaders:

1. Oversight and Government Reform: Robert Garcia (Calif.)

Garcia would go hard on corruption and self-dealing among Trump allies. He wants to make their lives hell. No committee matters more if Dems win.

Why you should care: If you've done any business with the administration, this is your top reputational risk. The Oversight chair can drag you to Capitol Hill to make you answer for it. Trump can and will pardon his family but not you and your company.

2. Energy and Commerce: Frank Pallone (N.J.)

Pallone would have jurisdiction over issues ranging from algorithmic pricing to children's safety online. He's out front on data centers, calling for a national moratorium.

Why you should care: He'll grill you on the topics really p@issing people off right now. Consider him the guy building the data center case for the Dems' nominee in '28.

Anyone who made deals with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his agencies should lawyer up, and lobbyist up, too.

3. Ways and Means: Richard "Richie" Neal (Mass.)

Neal's committee room will be the place in Washington most eager to discuss corporate tax rates and Trump's tariffs.

Why you should care: Expect him to use his bully pulpit to push companies on paying their fair share to the IRS. This is where the '28 tax debate begins.

4. Appropriations: Rosa DeLauro (Conn.)

DeLauro, 83, wants to make Trump answer for every penny he's spent and withheld.

Why you should care: Organizations that rely on government funding including contracts, grants, research dollars could get pulled into a Hill hearing.

5. Financial Services: Maxine Waters (Calif.)

Waters, who will turn 88 next month, would dig into who was in the loop when it came to pulling back enforcement on topics like crypto.

Why you should care: If your industry benefited from the lax financial oversight of the past couple of years, you risk becoming tied to that narrative, especially if you talked to Trump officials about it.

6. Judiciary: Jamie Raskin (Md.)

He's been a leading antitrust voice and has slammed the Trump administration's role in Paramount Skydance's takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Why you should care: If you're pursuing a big merger and the president feels like getting involved, Raskin's committee would become one big headache."
Axios


“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court

Ballroom, interfering with states rights with regard to voting…..the Panzer Division is gassed up and rolling.



“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
GrinandBearit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.
When you start with a conclusion, you tend to find evidence that agrees with it.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.

How so 88?

How was the lake this past weekend?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
GrinandBearit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.

How so 88?

How was the lake this past weekend?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

88?, I hope it's not a Nazi reference. What lake? I was at a funeral all weekend.

When you start with a conclusion, you tend to find evidence that agrees with it.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrinandBearit said:

SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.

How so 88?

How was the lake this past weekend?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

88?, I hope it's not a Nazi reference. What lake? I was at a funeral all weekend.



Most people suspect you to be BS 88, hence the 88 reference. I did not know that 88 is a considered to potentially be a Nazi reference. I sure hope that is not why BS has 88 in his screen name.

Anyway, why and how is mail in voting out of control? Here is a great recent article by CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/21/politics/markwayne-mullin-voter-fraud-nevada?Date=20260821&Profile=CNN,CNN+Politics&utm_content=1787341659&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

GrinandBearit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.

How so 88?

How was the lake this past weekend?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

88?, I hope it's not a Nazi reference. What lake? I was at a funeral all weekend.



Most people suspect you to be BS 88, hence the 88 reference. I did not know that 88 is a considered to potentially be a Nazi reference. I sure hope that is not why BS has 88 in his screen name.

Anyway, why and how is mail in voting out of control? Here is a great recent article by CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/21/politics/markwayne-mullin-voter-fraud-nevada?Date=20260821&Profile=CNN,CNN+Politics&utm_content=1787341659&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN



Most people including you would be wrong. I have stated this numerous times. You'd have to ask them why. Or ask Cal88. It is out of control because the system has expanded faster than the safeguards and oversight have expanded.

When you start with a conclusion, you tend to find evidence that agrees with it.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.


Care to offer some substance that backs up your claim instead of more misinformation?

Even the uber-conservative Heritage Foundation have found little fraud in mail-in voting when going back DECADES.

The percentage of fraudulent votes in Arizona over the last 25 years of elections was a miniscule .00008455%, and no election outcome in the U.S. has ever been altered by ballot fraud.



How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very | Brookings



DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrinandBearit said:

SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

SBGold said:

GrinandBearit said:

bearister said:

Supreme Court backs Trump's order to curb mail ballots | CNN Politics https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/24/politics/supreme-court





Well done SC. This was the right call, mail in voting has gone out of control.

How so 88?

How was the lake this past weekend?

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

88?, I hope it's not a Nazi reference. What lake? I was at a funeral all weekend.



Most people suspect you to be BS 88, hence the 88 reference. I did not know that 88 is a considered to potentially be a Nazi reference. I sure hope that is not why BS has 88 in his screen name.

Anyway, why and how is mail in voting out of control? Here is a great recent article by CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/21/politics/markwayne-mullin-voter-fraud-nevada?Date=20260821&Profile=CNN,CNN+Politics&utm_content=1787341659&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN



Most people including you would be wrong. I have stated this numerous times. You'd have to ask them why. Or ask Cal88. It is out of control because the system has expanded faster than the safeguards and oversight have expanded.




Seems like more misinformation not backed up by FACTS.
Care to offer some FACTS to back up your opinion?
GrinandBearit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I didn't bring up fraud. You seem to already have an agenda with this conversation based on your two responses some time apart from each other.
When you start with a conclusion, you tend to find evidence that agrees with it.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.