Oh shizz

6,583 Views | 94 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by SBGold
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, my bad.
Typo.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe this will all be proven to be true and the guilty will be brought to justice.

Both Matt Taibbi and Tulsi Gabbard have morphed into people 180 degrees different from the people they were just a few years back. Historically, I find people like that inherently untrustworthy.

I can't think of a single person in the Trump Administration that I believe is a credible person.

Perhaps this will become a teachable moment for me. We shall see.

*Question: Why did Comey choose to derail HRC's run for the presidency with his press conference about the emails instead of derailing Trump with the "false" Russia, Russia, Russia narrative?

Gabbard Claims Obama Administration Tried to Undermine Trump in 2016 - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/us/politics/gabbard-obama-trump-russia.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gabbard claims Obama officials 'manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian election interference
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5409448-gabbard-alleges-obama-officials-manipulated-intelligence/

"It's a day that ends with 'y' and Donald Trump desperately wants to change the subject, so Director Gabbard is rehashing decade-old false claims about the Obama Administration. Few episodes in our nation's history have been investigated as thoroughly as the Intelligence Community's warning in 2016 that Russia was interfering in the election," House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said in a statement.

"Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment."

Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also criticized Gabbard.

It seems DNI Gabbard is unaware that the years-long Russia investigation carried out by the Senate Intelligence Committee reaffirmed that 'the Russian government directed extensive activity against U.S. election infrastructure' ahead of the 2016 election, and that it 'used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign' in order to benefit Donald Trump. This conclusion was supported on a unanimous basis by every single Democrat and Republican on the committee," he said in a statement.

The move from Gabbard comes not only amid fallout from the Epstein saga but shortly after reports that she had fallen out of favor with Trump over intelligence related to Iran's nuclear program."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't think of a single person in the Trump Administration that I believe is a credible person.

Agreed
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Regarding Tulsi's smoking gun declassified information release on Friday, the corporate media have been oddly quiet...
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are all too busy paying Trump protection money. The NYT and The Hill stuff her bullsh@t.

Gabbard claims Obama officials 'manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian election interference
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5409448-gabbard-alleges-obama-officials-manipulated-intelligence/

Gabbard Claims Obama Administration Tried to Undermine Trump in 2016 - The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/us/politics/gabbard-obama-trump-russia.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Maybe this will all be proven to be true and the guilty will be brought to justice.

Both Matt Taibbi and Tulsi Gabbard have morphed into people 180 degrees different from the people they were just a few years back. Historically, I find people like that inherently untrustworthy.

I can't think of a single person in the Trump Administration that I believe is a credible person.

Perhaps this will become a teachable moment for me. We shall see.

*Question: Why did Comey choose to derail HRC's run for the presidency with his press conference about the emails instead of derailing Trump with the "false" Russia, Russia, Russia narrative?

Gabbard Claims Obama Administration Tried to Undermine Trump in 2016 - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/18/us/politics/gabbard-obama-trump-russia.html


I read Comey's book and, IIRC, his explanation for the Hillary Hatchet Job was that he had the information and, after agonizing over it a tad, he decided that it would be a greater sin to not disclose it, rather than to disclose it, prior to the election. He said he was trying to be as fair as he could be.

Take that as you will.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

bear2034 said:

concordtom said:

Is this it?
Or is this a parody?



This is the drawing the esteemed Wall Street Journal was referring to.

Not fair. Tom's kind of gullible.

We are talking about 2002, when a thinnish Trump was wondering around with dark longish hair. So far no reveal of the actual card.

Well, at least it was entertaining.

I read this morning that the Trump letter to Epstein was typed and the text formed a silhouette of a naked lady. There is no text in this drawing.
NVBear78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Gabbard claims Obama officials 'manufactured intelligence' of 2016 Russian election interference
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5409448-gabbard-alleges-obama-officials-manipulated-intelligence/

"It's a day that ends with 'y' and Donald Trump desperately wants to change the subject, so Director Gabbard is rehashing decade-old false claims about the Obama Administration. Few episodes in our nation's history have been investigated as thoroughly as the Intelligence Community's warning in 2016 that Russia was interfering in the election," House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said in a statement.

"Every legitimate investigation, including the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, found no evidence of politicization and endorsed the findings of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment."

Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, also criticized Gabbard.

It seems DNI Gabbard is unaware that the years-long Russia investigation carried out by the Senate Intelligence Committee reaffirmed that 'the Russian government directed extensive activity against U.S. election infrastructure' ahead of the 2016 election, and that it 'used social media to conduct an information warfare campaign' in order to benefit Donald Trump. This conclusion was supported on a unanimous basis by every single Democrat and Republican on the committee," he said in a statement.

The move from Gabbard comes not only amid fallout from the Epstein saga but shortly after reports that she had fallen out of favor with Trump over intelligence related to Iran's nuclear program."


With all due respect, have you read the details on the information that has been released? This looks like comments by Democratic politicians saying this story (with no comment on the facts behind it) was merely Trump trying to change the subject? If i i heard them speak in detail about the facts released their comments might seem like more than continued political posturing.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

FWIW: My thread (which I was the OP) on regarding what the WSJ had found in an Epstein Birthday Letter was locked by the mods because they felt it was a duplicate thread to this one by SB Gold.

Interestingly enough, I had actually provided a FREE link to the WSJ article.

Here it is again:

Exclusive | Jeffrey Epstein's Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump. - WSJ
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DUCK!
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DUCK!
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DUCK!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GOOSE!!!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is the probability both D-Wags and SBGold are posting under the influence?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

What is the probability both D-Wags and SBGold are posting under the influence?

Yeah, like you're not influenced by anybody.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

What is the probability both D-Wags and SBGold are posting under the influence?

Yeah, like you're not influenced by anybody.


TDS

Trump
Devotion
Syndrome
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

What is the probability both D-Wags and SBGold are posting under the influence?

Yeah, like you're not influenced by anybody.


TDS

Trump
Devotion
Syndrome



I am looking forward to more objective takes from stable geniuses on how In N Out suddenly doesn't make good burgers.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But what does Ai say?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

But what does Ai say?



"Yes, In-N-Out is generally considered to make good hamburgers, particularly within the fast-food category. Many people praise their fresh ingredients, simple menu, and consistently high quality. ". Yw
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

But what does Ai say?



"Yes, In-N-Out is generally considered to make good hamburgers, particularly within the fast-food category. Many people praise their fresh ingredients, simple menu, and consistently high quality. ". Yw


I've never had a problem with their burgers.
But their fries suck. Taste like cardboard.
Zero flavor.

Super Duper Burger much better!



tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:


I am looking forward to more objective takes from stable geniuses on how In N Out suddenly doesn't make good burgers.

They never did.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

But what does Ai say?

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

What is the probability both D-Wags and SBGold are posting under the influence?

DUCK!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.