Rich Dems will benefit from the new tax cuts, we don't want them

1,480 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by DiabloWags
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://apple.news/AF5tnj397T9unPOZB-DURdw

At some point, to benefit while crushing others less fortunate feels wrong and should not be the focus.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care. If dumb, poor, uneducated Americans want to vote to make me more rich and keep themselves poor, well then that's their choice.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care.


Please let us all know when you get to the point where you've accumulated some wealth and you're willing to be taxed on it. Because it's always real easy to vote on how other people's money should be taxed when it doesn't impact you.


dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care.


Please let us all know when you get to the point where you've accumulated some wealth and you're willing to be taxed on it. Because it's always real easy to vote on how other people's money should be taxed when it doesn't impact you.





You quoted 2 simple sentences and your comprehension was a fail. Spectacular.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2019/02/05/democrats-70-percent-tax-rate-000879/
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care.


Please let us all know when you get to the point where you've accumulated some wealth and you're willing to be taxed on it. Because it's always real easy to vote on how other people's money should be taxed when it doesn't impact you.





You quoted 2 simple sentences and your comprehension was a fail. Spectacular.


I try to dumb it down for a liberal that praises the likes of Paul Krugman and Robert Reich.
And who can't read a chart on 10-year yields.

You're welcome.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care.


Please let us all know when you get to the point where you've accumulated some wealth and you're willing to be taxed on it. Because it's always real easy to vote on how other people's money should be taxed when it doesn't impact you.





You quoted 2 simple sentences and your comprehension was a fail. Spectacular.


I try to dumb it down for a liberal that praises the likes of Paul Krugman and Robert Reich.
And who can't read a chart on 10-year yields.

You're welcome.



You dumb it down all right
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is where democrats leadership continues to drop the ball. Honestly they have been bs ing since the southern strategy/ Lee Atwater. Whoever though Harris could beat trump in this climate was not reading the room correctly, Honestly they still don't get it still too many democrats are masquerading neo liberals. Stop playing games find one issue drive it home. The democratic presidential election was out of touch … lacking leadership has that changed?

Only way Dems win is being the party of the people. Take a stand stop playing the lobby/money game go balls to wall hard correction …. Gotta make make white's middle/poor class chose themselves and this country over their race.
In order to change policy we have to first change minds…
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

This is where democrats leadership continues to drop the ball. Honestly they have been bs ing since the southern strategy/ Lee Atwater. Whoever though Harris could beat trump in this climate was not reading the room correctly, Honestly they still don't get it still too many democrats are masquerading neo liberals. Stop playing games find one issue drive it home. The democratic presidential election was out of touch … lacking leadership has that changed?

Only way Dems win is being the party of the people. Take a stand stop playing the lobby/money game go balls to wall hard correction …. Gotta make make white's middle/poor class chose themselves and this country over their race.
In order to change policy we have to first change minds…


Why did Joe Biden win in 2020?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"First they came for our EV subsidies and we said nothing…"
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.


There's a healthy dose of Truth here.

People probably vote for Identity more than Economics.
Like, there's surely a ton of people who would rather sit around a pot of stew with their kinfolk than be living it up with strangers - if you catch my drift.

Team affiliations rule.
Look at all the hapless losers who return to the Growls page year after year!!

It's human psychology.
Tribe.

And off that idea, there's even a book by that title. It talks about how strangers will indoctrinate themselves into a Tribe, a band of brothers, and go kill, be killed, and even sacrifice themselves for their tribe. It's evolutionarily instinctive in us! And professional groups will brainwash you to be in their tribe!
Church (of most any religion)
The Army
Apple computer (sorry, stepmom worked their in the early 80's - cult-like following!)


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:



Why did Joe Biden win in 2020?


I think Jenna, you know, the attorney that got her ticket yanked and cried in court during one of the felonies that got pasted on her, said Biden won because the election was rigged.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.

There's a healthy dose of Truth here.

People probably vote for Identity more than Economics.
Like, there's surely a ton of people who would rather sit around a pot of stew with their kinfolk than be living it up with strangers - if you catch my drift.

This sentiment is insanely offensive and demonstrably stupidly wrong. After spending time on this board I've come to expect such racist stupidity from G4R. I guess I shouldn't be surprised to see anyone else agree with it but I am.

Per CNN, Trump had some 77 million voters. 65%-78% of Americans are bigots? The same country that elected Barack Obama twice. Uh huh.

From Pew:

Trump won with a voter coalition that was more racially and ethnically diverse than in 2020 or 2016, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of the 2024 electorate.
  • Among Hispanic voters, Trump battled to near parity in 2024 (51% Harris, 48% Trump) after losing to Joe Biden 61%-36% in 2020.
  • Trump won 15% of Black voters up from 8% four years earlier.
  • Trump also did better among Asian voters. While a majority of Asian voters (57%) backed Harris, 40% supported Trump. This was a narrower margin than Biden's in 2020 (70% to 30%).
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care. If dumb, poor, uneducated Americans want to vote to make me more rich and keep themselves poor, well then that's their choice.

You can give money to the federal government, primarily through donations to reduce the public debt or, in some cases, to support specific government programs. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, a part of the U.S. Treasury Department, accepts voluntary financial contributions and these can be made electronically or by mail. Shall I send you a link? The problem is you never put your money where your mouth is.

Hey Mr. Vote Blue - can I send the link to you? Maybe you can pass it on to those Dems who don't wan't the tax benefits?
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe there was a story last week about the government arranging it so they can receive payments via Venmo and PayPal to make it easier for those who want to contribute more to lower the debt.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care. If dumb, poor, uneducated Americans want to vote to make me more rich and keep themselves poor, well then that's their choice.

You can give money to the federal government, primarily through donations to reduce the public debt or, in some cases, to support specific government programs. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, a part of the U.S. Treasury Department, accepts voluntary financial contributions and these can be made electronically or by mail. Shall I send you a link? The problem is you never put your money where your mouth is.

Hey Mr. Vote Blue - can I send the link to you? Maybe you can pass it on to those Dems who don't wan't the tax benefits?


I'm sorry you pretend to not understand how liberalism works to all pitch in together and all benefit together but somehow I dont think you want to run a candidate to oppose social security and Medicare so something tells me you are being dishonest in your response.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.


There's a healthy dose of Truth here.

People probably vote for Identity more than Economics.
Like, there's surely a ton of people who would rather sit around a pot of stew with their kinfolk than be living it up with strangers - if you catch my drift.

Team affiliations rule.
Look at all the hapless losers who return to the Growls page year after year!!

It's human psychology.
Tribe.

And off that idea, there's even a book by that title. It talks about how strangers will indoctrinate themselves into a Tribe, a band of brothers, and go kill, be killed, and even sacrifice themselves for their tribe. It's evolutionarily instinctive in us! And professional groups will brainwash you to be in their tribe!
Church (of most any religion)
The Army
Apple computer (sorry, stepmom worked their in the early 80's - cult-like following!)





Trump beat Hillary and Harris and lost to Biden even though Hillary and Harris both ran better (though different) campaigns and both had better policies for average Americans.

Trump got the white supremacist and greedy vote in 3 elections. He got the sexist vote in 2 elections.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've seen the link. I would contribute but why would I trust this admin and GOP majority to do the right things with it? I'm not subsidizing Alligator Alcatraz or Trump golf games (where he cheats). Send me the Cal NIL link though

Do better MAGAts.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

I believe there was a story last week about the government arranging it so they can receive payments via Venmo and PayPal to make it easier for those who want to contribute more to lower the debt.


Were those the platforms used by Paramount Global and Skydance Media to transfer the $36,000,000?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I've seen the link. I would contribute but why would I trust this admin and GOP majority to do the right things with it? I'm not subsidizing Alligator Alcatraz or Trump golf games (where he cheats). Send me the Cal NIL link though

Do better MAGAts.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Good point. I'm actually deferring some income (and taxes) from 2026 to 2027 when there will hopefully be a Democratic Congress.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tax increases for the middle class!
Tax the poor!

Democrats 2028
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

tequila4kapp said:

I believe there was a story last week about the government arranging it so they can receive payments via Venmo and PayPal to make it easier for those who want to contribute more to lower the debt.


Were those the platforms used by Paramount Global and Skydance Media to transfer the $36,000,000?

Dont forget all the shortstopping, skimming into Trump sub accounts.

Would anyone trust anything Trump says or does?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:



Trump beat Hillary and Harris and lost to Biden even though Hillary and Harris both ran better (though different) campaigns and both had better policies for average Americans.

Trump got the white supremacist and greedy vote in 3 elections. He got the sexist vote in 2 elections.


Totally!
9 years ago I queried people at Walmart waiting for tires (killing time) and two women both told me that a woman could no be president.

I was SHOCKED!

I told them, but you're a woman!
And they repeated themselves.

Sometimes movies come out about slavery and some of the characters are just totally bought into their bottom of the barrel status in life - as a contrast to the heroic resister.

I think the psychological imprinting we all receive in various unknown ways and sources is much more powerful than we realize!! The power of the subconscious is vast!
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

wifeisafurd said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care. If dumb, poor, uneducated Americans want to vote to make me more rich and keep themselves poor, well then that's their choice.

You can give money to the federal government, primarily through donations to reduce the public debt or, in some cases, to support specific government programs. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, a part of the U.S. Treasury Department, accepts voluntary financial contributions and these can be made electronically or by mail. Shall I send you a link? The problem is you never put your money where your mouth is.

Hey Mr. Vote Blue - can I send the link to you? Maybe you can pass it on to those Dems who don't wan't the tax benefits?


I'm sorry you pretend to not understand how liberalism works to all pitch in together and all benefit together but somehow I dont think you want to run a candidate to oppose social security and Medicare so something tells me you are being dishonest in your response.



Being dishonest is someone saying that they deferred income because somehow taxes will change after the midterm elections (clearly someone who does not get that the President will veto any tax increase).

Or someone responding to a OP that Democrats are willing to pay higher taxes, by saying they will only pay more taxes when the people in power pass policies they like.

Per Statistica, over 40% of the households in the US pay no federal income tax, and very few of those households are the super wealthy. About 30% of those filling tax returns don't pay income tax, again almost all those filers are low income taxpayers. Government projections estimate a decline in the percentage of non-payers in the coming years if the Big Beautiful Ball had not passed where certain tax provisions would have otherwise expired. How exactly is all those people not paying any income tax paying their a fair share?

Wait they pay payroll taxes like for social security or Medicare, and then benefit from those programs when they reach a certain age, just like everyone else. But that seem unfair to you, we need to redistribute income more whenever we see it. Let's screw the high wage earners even more so we can proved further disincentivize for individuals and businesses from working, saving, and investing.

I'm assuming that you want the "very rich" to pay higher taxes on their income to pay their fair share. But we keep coming back to the problem that the very wealthy often manage the affairs so they have no taxable income - so guess what, they again pay no income taxes. You are left with a tax on wealth which is unconstitutional (it certainly will be under the current SCOTUS) and will never become law in any event because the elites (and their donors) in both parties will never accept a wealth tax. How exactly is that a fair share for me who pays a much higher effective tax rate? Would I object to a wealth tax on the super rich we lived in your seriously fanatasy world and the tax was legal and actually passed? Sure, we all become liberals when it comes to supporting taxing other people.

In the real world, public opinion surveys consistently show a significant portion of the population, across income levels, expressing resistance to higher taxes. The Democrats face an uphill battle already have in taking back the Senate in 2026, you want to lead with a big tax increase?

Be interesting to sew what portions of your response actually deal with the issue raised here.


wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

https://apple.news/AF5tnj397T9unPOZB-DURdw

At some point, to benefit while crushing others less fortunate feels wrong and should not be the focus.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

can you examine how rich Democrats will have lower taxes from the new tax bill than they pay now/
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

SBGold said:

https://apple.news/AF5tnj397T9unPOZB-DURdw

At some point, to benefit while crushing others less fortunate feels wrong and should not be the focus.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

can you examine how rich Democrats will have lower taxes from the new tax bill than they pay now/

I literally attached an article about a rich Dem couple that has affirmed that their tax advisors have noted they will save millions due to the tax cuts. What the 'ell else more do you need?

I'm not a tax expert and will not play one here. Too many liability issues.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.


Your concerns for bigotry against Black people would have a lot more conviction if you had an ounce of concern for bigotry against women
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:



Per Statistica, over 40% of the households in the US pay no federal income tax, and very few of those households are the super wealthy. About 30% of those filling tax returns don't pay income tax, again almost all those filers are low income taxpayers. Government projections estimate a decline in the percentage of non-payers in the coming years if the Big Beautiful Ball had not passed where certain tax provisions would have otherwise expired. How exactly is all those people not paying any income tax paying their a fair share?

Wait they pay payroll taxes like for social security or Medicare, and then benefit from those programs when they reach a certain age, just like everyone else. But that seem unfair to you, we need to redistribute income more whenever we see it. Let's screw the high wage earners even more so we can proved further disincentivize for individuals and businesses from working, saving, and investing.

I'm assuming that you want the "very rich" to pay higher taxes on their income to pay their fair share. But we keep coming back to the problem that the very wealthy often manage the affairs so they have no taxable income - so guess what, they again pay no income taxes. You are left with a tax on wealth which is unconstitutional (it certainly will be under the current SCOTUS) and will never become law in any event because the elites (and their donors) in both parties will never accept a wealth tax. How exactly is that a fair share for me who pays a much higher effective tax rate? Would I object to a wealth tax on the super rich we lived in your seriously fanatasy world and the tax was legal and actually passed? Sure, we all become liberals when it comes to supporting taxing other people.


Well said Sir.
Well said.

And in CA, the Top 1% of wage earners pay nearly half of all state income taxes. I believe it was 45% in 2019.

"Top 1 Percent" Pays Half of State Income Taxes [EconTax Blog]

https://share.google/uU6T9RmrRSHO93O1P
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.


Your concerns for bigotry against Black people would have a lot more conviction if you had an ounce of concern for bigotry against women


When have I been misogynistic towards women?
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

wifeisafurd said:

SBGold said:

https://apple.news/AF5tnj397T9unPOZB-DURdw

At some point, to benefit while crushing others less fortunate feels wrong and should not be the focus.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

can you examine how rich Democrats will have lower taxes from the new tax bill than they pay now/

I literally attached an article about a rich Dem couple that has affirmed that their tax advisors have noted they will save millions due to the tax cuts. What the 'ell else more do you need?

I'm not a tax expert and will not play one here. Too many liability issues.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

So you don't know, but based on an article that said one couple was told by their accountant said they would save millions in taxes, you just assume that is the case for everyone. Particularly where there is no attempt to explain where the tax savings come from. if you don't want to play an expert, then you shouldn't don't go around making statements about what the tax law does.

Most high income taxpayers in high tax states (which are mostly blue state like CA) will actually pay more in taxes in 2025 than in 2024. The tax deduction for state taxes of $40K and the PTET are now phased out under the new tax bill at $500K of adjusted gross income. That represents a huge tax increase for many taxpayers in California who have their professional practices, real estate or business in PTETs, and a nice shift in the tax burden to Californias as I assume a good portion of the tax hit will be passed along to the State's consumers.




wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

wifeisafurd said:



Per Statistica, over 40% of the households in the US pay no federal income tax, and very few of those households are the super wealthy. About 30% of those filling tax returns don't pay income tax, again almost all those filers are low income taxpayers. Government projections estimate a decline in the percentage of non-payers in the coming years if the Big Beautiful Ball had not passed where certain tax provisions would have otherwise expired. How exactly is all those people not paying any income tax paying their a fair share?

Wait they pay payroll taxes like for social security or Medicare, and then benefit from those programs when they reach a certain age, just like everyone else. But that seem unfair to you, we need to redistribute income more whenever we see it. Let's screw the high wage earners even more so we can proved further disincentivize for individuals and businesses from working, saving, and investing.

I'm assuming that you want the "very rich" to pay higher taxes on their income to pay their fair share. But we keep coming back to the problem that the very wealthy often manage the affairs so they have no taxable income - so guess what, they again pay no income taxes. You are left with a tax on wealth which is unconstitutional (it certainly will be under the current SCOTUS) and will never become law in any event because the elites (and their donors) in both parties will never accept a wealth tax. How exactly is that a fair share for me who pays a much higher effective tax rate? Would I object to a wealth tax on the super rich we lived in your seriously fanatasy world and the tax was legal and actually passed? Sure, we all become liberals when it comes to supporting taxing other people.


Well said Sir.
Well said.

And in CA, the Top 1% of wage earners pay nearly half of all state income taxes. I believe it was 45% in 2019.

"Top 1 Percent" Pays Half of State Income Taxes [EconTax Blog]

https://share.google/uU6T9RmrRSHO93O1P

well it gets even stupider when you consider how the new bill screws high income Californians with PTETs.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

dajo9 said:

wifeisafurd said:

dajo9 said:

I've voted to pay more taxes ever since I started making real money. At this point I dont care. If dumb, poor, uneducated Americans want to vote to make me more rich and keep themselves poor, well then that's their choice.

You can give money to the federal government, primarily through donations to reduce the public debt or, in some cases, to support specific government programs. The Bureau of the Fiscal Service, a part of the U.S. Treasury Department, accepts voluntary financial contributions and these can be made electronically or by mail. Shall I send you a link? The problem is you never put your money where your mouth is.

Hey Mr. Vote Blue - can I send the link to you? Maybe you can pass it on to those Dems who don't wan't the tax benefits?


I'm sorry you pretend to not understand how liberalism works to all pitch in together and all benefit together but somehow I dont think you want to run a candidate to oppose social security and Medicare so something tells me you are being dishonest in your response.



Being dishonest is someone saying that they deferred income because somehow taxes will change after the midterm elections (clearly someone who does not get that the President will veto any tax increase).



I tend to stop reading when someone is dishonest about me. Happens to me a lot here. My opponents love (need?) strawmen. Congratulations, you couldn't get through one paragraph.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

wifeisafurd said:

SBGold said:

https://apple.news/AF5tnj397T9unPOZB-DURdw

At some point, to benefit while crushing others less fortunate feels wrong and should not be the focus.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever

can you examine how rich Democrats will have lower taxes from the new tax bill than they pay now/

I literally attached an article about a rich Dem couple that has affirmed that their tax advisors have noted they will save millions due to the tax cuts. What the 'ell else more do you need?

I'm not a tax expert and will not play one here. Too many liability issues.

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE BLUE

Go Bears Forever


Furd is playing a game in which he compares the new tax bill with the old tax bill, both of which massively benefit the rich. The old tax bill is expiring.

The real comparison is the new tax bill vs. law before the new tax bill passed which, again, Furd wants to avoid that more relevant comparison because he is spinning the issue for the benefit of rich folks like him. Dishonesty is integral to Furd's arguments here.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

dajo9 said:

going4roses said:

Honestly a fluke. Focus on the 50-60 million bigots that voted for trump.
Be concerned about what is next what can be achieved/corrected.


Your concerns for bigotry against Black people would have a lot more conviction if you had an ounce of concern for bigotry against women


When have I been misogynistic towards women?


Now imagine a white person who is indifferent to racism saying "when have I been racist towards Black people".
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.