J6

6,544 Views | 86 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by concordtom
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Conspiracy theorists were right again! It was a FEDSURRECTION.

We've been lied to for years. It's time for the deep state actors who staged J6 to be indicted.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Y'all really are insane. Seek help
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1,000 people entered the Capitol, with 300 undercover FBI agents, that's 30%.
m2bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

1,000 people entered the Capitol, with 300 undercover FBI agents, that's 30%.

I laughed.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
m2bear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

1,000 people entered the Capitol, with 300 undercover FBI agents, that's 30%.

I laughed.

Just remember that the J6 Fedsurrection was just a distraction for the stolen 2020 election.

Also, outside of the 275 FBI agents, we don't know who else from other agencies were at the Capitol that day.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They were not undercover. They were plain clothes. Apparently havong plain clothes fbi in large dc crowds is sop....so if you get the aar for the womens march you will see similar numbers.

What isnt clear is how fbi defines that as fbi agents are often in suits and biz causal.....is that plain clothes in their jargon?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

They were not undercover. They were plain clothes. Apparently havong plain clothes fbi in large dc crowds is sop....so if you get the aar for the womens march you will see similar numbers.

What isnt clear is how fbi defines that as fbi agents are often in suits and biz causal.....is that plain clothes in their jargon?



It looks like that many of these agents were doing agitprop, the video above of the guy breaking the window is exhibit A.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Conspiracy theorists were right again! It was a FEDSURRECTION.

We've been lied to for years. It's time for the deep state actors who staged J6 to be indicted.


Once again, you display terribly poor reading comp.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


PAC-10-BEAR said:

Conspiracy theorists were right again! It was a FEDSURRECTION.

We've been lied to for years. It's time for the deep state actors who staged J6 to be indicted.

Once again, you display terribly poor reading comp.

"as well as inside the Capitol."

The FBI didn't give a breakdown of agents in the Capitol and those who responded.

Also, this language does not exclude personnel who may have been there undercover, does it?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This seems odd.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Nice oxfords.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Nancy Pelosi's filmmaker daughter and son-in-law just happened to be the Capitol too.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


This seems odd.


I'm sick of your BS.
Ignore status activated.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rational people knew they were lying as usual that's all they do is lie and lie and lie about lying wrapped in diss information
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When Kash Patel f@ucks you on your false narrative, you are too far gone and you ain't comin' back.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

socaltownie said:

They were not undercover. They were plain clothes. Apparently havong plain clothes fbi in large dc crowds is sop....so if you get the aar for the womens march you will see similar numbers.

What isnt clear is how fbi defines that as fbi agents are often in suits and biz causal.....is that plain clothes in their jargon?



It looks like that many of these agents were doing agitprop, the video above of the guy breaking the window is exhibit A.


This doesn't add up. Why send plain clothes officers into a crowd for crowd control. You send in uniformed officers. You send in something, someone with authority (officers in uniform, military, national guard, etc)

More basic: why did they hide this highly cogent fact for 4.5 years?

How many CIA and CHI were there?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't forget the man on the ground, with bullhorn, Ray Epps. On J5 he was telling Patriots to "go into the Capitol" - and Patriots immediately shouted "Nooo!!! Fed! Fed! Fed!"

On J6 he played a lead role leading the crowd, along with a man atop scaffolding with a bullhorn. It also looks like he directs a young man to remove security gates. Epps:

- was immediately on the FBIs Ten Most Wanted List
- then removed, with no charges!
- finally charged due to public pressure, prosecutors seeking six months jail time
- he got off w one-year probation while others rotted in filthy, inhumane DC jails



Epps also allegedly lied to the J6 committee, and texted his nephew that he helped "orchestrate" J6.




Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

What if we eventually find out that every one of the peaceful protestors in the Capitol that day were FBI agents... except for that poor, patriotic girl that was shot and killed?

What will the radical left say then?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Merrick Garland refused to answer how many assets were at the Capitol.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


What if we eventually find out that every one of the peaceful protestors in the Capitol that day were FBI agents... except for that poor, patriotic girl that was shot and killed?

What will the radical left say then?


Lol

That's basically what they are selling!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Nancy Pelosi's filmmaker daughter and son-in-law just happened to be the Capitol too.

I've read several times that Pelosi's daughter was filming a documentary about Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi had to be at the Capitol that day (and it was a significant day with the election ratification and the Stop The Steal March). Any documentary filmmaker would have been at the Capitol that significant day. As for the son in law, it seems reasonable to have a second camera crew filming the protesters outside the Capitol for b-roll footage. I imagine he was working with that camera crew.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:


Nancy Pelosi's filmmaker daughter and son-in-law just happened to be the Capitol too.

I've read several times that Pelosi's daughter was filming a documentary about Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi had to be at the Capitol that day (and it was a significant day with the election ratification and the Stop The Steal March). Any documentary filmmaker would have been at the Capitol that significant day. As for the son in law, it seems reasonable to have a second camera crew filming the protesters outside the Capitol for b-roll footage. I imagine he was working with that camera crew.

That's exactly what was going on, not that it matters to these guys.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:


Nancy Pelosi's filmmaker daughter and son-in-law just happened to be the Capitol too.

I've read several times that Pelosi's daughter was filming a documentary about Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi had to be at the Capitol that day (and it was a significant day with the election ratification and the Stop The Steal March). Any documentary filmmaker would have been at the Capitol that significant day. As for the son in law, it seems reasonable to have a second camera crew filming the protesters outside the Capitol for b-roll footage. I imagine he was working with that camera crew.

That's exactly what was going on, not that it matters to these guys.

I almost added that to my post. I know he is impervious to explanations that might counter his deep seated snark.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPF0gb-jKDJ/?igsh=MWV2cjFvYWZzZzEycg==
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?

concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're posting thoughts from Hollywood celebrities now?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can blame Obama for giving Trump the motivation to run with his roasting Trump at that DC press dinner 14 years ago.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

You're posting thoughts from Hollywood celebrities now?


Always the weathervane for how the country is moving. You don't believe me, ask Kamala Harris
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.