Where'd aunbear89 go?

943 Views | 41 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by PAC-10-BEAR
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearly you stay getting cooked
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

going4roses said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

going4roses said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

^Whose sock puppet are you?

Aunbear just couldn't help himself, he must have racked 10,000+ heated argument-type posts, the mods are amazingly patient and lenient for him to have lasted that long.


And then there are people that were "triggered" by a total stranger's death and who have posted 25X a day since September 10th, but have never set foot in OT since becoming a member in 2020 until that day in Utah.

Lmfao!



The gall to bring up sock puppetry lol when that is all they have done for the last couple years over here


Bingo.



Diablo knows, he's got three accounts here for all his stalking he does


Stop lying he might be nuts but is not bat **** crazy like y'all he at uses his brain


It was a joke first off all. Secondly, he and you absolutely are bat **** crazy lmao. Yall just agree with each other so you don't notice


You said elsewhere that you haven't been around OT long enough.
Yeah, lemme just say, you haven't and you do t know everyone's story. As such, please leave G4R alone.
Thank you.


This is hypocritical. going4roses repeatedly assumes my story and calls me racist. No chance I'm going to allow him to think he is the arbiter of thought.


How kind of you to take revenge on someone you don't know.
Sleep well.


Revenge? Lmao this is an internet forum.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Bearly you stay getting cooked


And you stay being a close minded race baiter. Glad we got that settled
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

going4roses said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

going4roses said:

DiabloWags said:

Cal88 said:

^Whose sock puppet are you?

Aunbear just couldn't help himself, he must have racked 10,000+ heated argument-type posts, the mods are amazingly patient and lenient for him to have lasted that long.


And then there are people that were "triggered" by a total stranger's death and who have posted 25X a day since September 10th, but have never set foot in OT since becoming a member in 2020 until that day in Utah.

Lmfao!



The gall to bring up sock puppetry lol when that is all they have done for the last couple years over here


Bingo.



Diablo knows, he's got three accounts here for all his stalking he does


Stop lying he might be nuts but is not bat **** crazy like y'all he at uses his brain


It was a joke first off all. Secondly, he and you absolutely are bat **** crazy lmao. Yall just agree with each other so you don't notice


You said elsewhere that you haven't been around OT long enough.
Yeah, lemme just say, you haven't and you do t know everyone's story. As such, please leave G4R alone.
Thank you.


This is hypocritical. going4roses repeatedly assumes my story and calls me racist. No chance I'm going to allow him to think he is the arbiter of thought.


How kind of you to take revenge on someone you don't know.
Sleep well.


Revenge? Lmao this is an internet forum.

Reciprocity…revenge.
Tit for tat.

Each of us can decide how want to respond to the world around us.

If someone is unkind or insulting on this forum, we can respond in-kind. Revenge is the word I used for that.

If someone is generous, we can respond in kindness. Reciprocal kindness.

A really bad thing is to start a slant toward negativity when none existed.

And a really cool thing is to flip a negativity into a positivity!

You wanna know who is really good at that? Big C
Another name that comes to mind, someone who never responds to negativity with negativity is Okaydo.

I'm far from a saint!
But I'm trying to improve what I put out there. Nothing is gained by my insults.

I requested that you lay off G4F with insults. Please consider it.
Thanks!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"And a really cool thing is to flip a negativity into a positivity!"



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:



In that era, the right hand was typically used for actions, including striking. A backhand slap to the right cheek was often a gesture of insult or humiliation, commonly used by someone in a position of authority or dominance (e.g., a master striking a servant or a Roman soldier striking a Jew). It was less about physical harm and more about asserting superiority or shaming the other person. The backhand, delivered with the back of the right hand to the right cheek, was a deliberate, degrading act.

"Turning the other cheek" in this context means offering the left cheek, which would require the striker to use an open-handed slap (since a backhand to the left cheek is awkward or impossible with the right hand). An open-handed slap was seen as a strike between equals, not a gesture of humiliation. By turning the other cheek, the person being struck refuses to accept the intended humiliation, instead asserting their dignity and challenging the aggressor's attempt to degrade them. It's a nonviolent act of defiance, not passive submission. So, "hitting with the backhand" refers to this specific cultural act of a demeaning, backhanded slap meant to insult or dominate.

Jesus' instruction to "turn the other cheek" encourages responding to such an insult with resilience and dignity, undermining the aggressor's power without resorting to violence.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.