Making me proud, keep
Going Cardi

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE GAVIn

iCE OUt

SBGold said:

---

Making me proud, keep
Going Cardi

UNITY OVER DIVISION

VOTE GAVIn

iCE OUt

---

DHS doesn't have anything to do with Epstein. Her comeback made her sound stupid

You mean like our Attorney General talking about DOW 50,000 in front of the House Judiciary Committee?

Such a great comeback!

DiabloWags said:

---

You mean like our Attorney General talking about DOW 50,000 in front of the Hiuse Judiciary Committee?

Such a great comeback!

---

That has nothing to do with this thread but keep spewing your talking points in every thread

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

You mean like our Attorney General talking about DOW 50,000 in front of the Hiuse Judiciary Committee?

Such a great comeback!

---

That has nothing to do with this thread but keep spewing your talking points in every thread

---

Dow 50,000 has nothing to do with EPSTEIN.
But Bondi made the comment anyway.
"Made her sound stupid"

Thanks.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

You mean like our Attorney General talking about DOW 50,000 in front of the Hiuse Judiciary Committee?

Such a great comeback!

---

That has nothing to do with this thread but keep spewing your talking points in every thread

---

Dow 50,000 has nothing to do with EPSTEIN.
But Bondi made the comment anyway.
"Made her sound stupid"

Thanks.

---

And still has nothing to do with this thread.

Woooooooosh...

DiabloWags said:

---

Woooooooosh...

---

No bro. Nothing went over my head. Pam Bondi has nothing to do with Cardi making herself look dumb, no matter how hard you try

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

The amount of posts saying "flagged" by SBGold says otherwise.

Flagging and banning seem to go hand in hand.

Let's put up the names of everyone who has done time and the number of times they have. This could turn into a cool board activity and prediction game. I bet "Dajo goes down again for the 8 th time within two weeks" for calling random posters Nazis."

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

+1

I agree that he seems to take every difference in opinion as a personal attack. I remember a time when Conservatives would call Liberals a bunch of SNOWFLAKES for this kind of behavior.

My how the tables have turned.

I guess Conservatives have now learned how to play the "victim" better than ever from their leader, Donald Trump.

DiabloWags said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

+1

I agree that he seems to take every difference in opinion as a personal attack. I remember a time when Conservatives would call Liberals a bunch of SNOWFLAKES for this kind of behavior.

My how the tables have turned.

I guess Conservatives have now learned how to play the "victim" better than ever from their leader, Donald Trump.

---

No I take personal attacks as personal attacks. When you call someone a name, as you often do in your posts, that's a personal attack. It's against board rules. You call people stupid every other post

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2655210

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

There are only two people I regularly flag here, Wags and SBGold because they insert personal attacks in a majority of their posts. The only other person I can think of that I flagged is Dajo when he decided to call me a Nazi repeatedly.

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

+1

I agree that he seems to take every difference in opinion as a personal attack. I remember a time when Conservatives would call Liberals a bunch of SNOWFLAKES for this kind of behavior.

My how the tables have turned.

I guess Conservatives have now learned how to play the "victim" better than ever from their leader, Donald Trump.

---

No I take personal attacks as personal attacks. When you call someone a name, as you often do in your posts, that's a personal attack. It's against board rules. You call people stupid every other post

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2655210

---

In that case though, Wags' characterization of your posts comes across a lot more as an objective assessment than a personal attack.

100%

DiabloWags said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

+1

I agree that he seems to take every difference in opinion as a personal attack. I remember a time when Conservatives would call Liberals a bunch of SNOWFLAKES for this kind of behavior.

My how the tables have turned.

I guess Conservatives have now learned how to play the "victim" better than ever from their leader, Donald Trump.

---

No I take personal attacks as personal attacks. When you call someone a name, as you often do in your posts, that's a personal attack. It's against board rules. You call people stupid every other post

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2655210

---

In that case though, Wags' characterization of your posts comes across a lot more as an objective assessment than a personal attack.

---

Bingo.

It's laughable that an objective assessment becomes a personal attack in the mind of another.
I haven't called anyone any "names" in quite some time . . . since I last got suspended for a couple of days.
I think the Mods are clearly aware of that.

I don't need to post here 200x in 16 hours to feel good about myself.
Or spend my day "flagging" posters who I don't agree with.

My ego isn't that frail.
And I have a life.

---

Thank you for proving my point as you post more personal attacks.

I don't flag people I disagree with, I flag people who break the board rules. There are many I disagree with here but they don't insult me constantly.

It's hilarious that you don't get on SBGold for flagging and posting about flagging every chance he gets.

Cal88 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Man, your synapses have trouble firing

---

Haven't had enough posts deleted today? "Flagged"

Your initial post showed Cardi being wrong and you fail to respond to that and instead result to personal insults. Again.

---

If SBGold had phrased his post as "I believe your synapses are having trouble firing today", would that have constituted an allowable opinion, or would you still have taken it as a person attack and flagged it?

I'm just wondering because it seems to me that you are the number one flagger and instigator of argumentation here in OT land, and I'm wondering if there's any form of critique which does not lead you to complaint via moderation.

---

+1

I agree that he seems to take every difference in opinion as a personal attack. I remember a time when Conservatives would call Liberals a bunch of SNOWFLAKES for this kind of behavior.

My how the tables have turned.

I guess Conservatives have now learned how to play the "victim" better than ever from their leader, Donald Trump.

---

No I take personal attacks as personal attacks. When you call someone a name, as you often do in your posts, that's a personal attack. It's against board rules. You call people stupid every other post

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/125946/replies/2655210

---

In that case though, Wags' characterization of your posts comes across a lot more as an objective assessment than a personal attack.

---

See his response above as he's proving my point for me. And it's now been removed.