Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread

7,198 Views | 203 Replies | Last: 19 min ago by bearister
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Noted energy analyst Paul Sankey knows what he's talking about.
He was on TV earlier this morning.

This isn't over 'not by a long way', says Paul Sankey on disruption in oil market | Watch


About Paul Sankey | Oil & Gas Equity Analyst | Sankey Research


You're welcome!

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

We've been over this because you post this same post every three days.


Yes, Trump voters were gullible to believe all of his campaign lies.
See you in November.

MAGA!



Yessir, the people will decide. Not OT talking heads


I did not know that.
Especially given such voluminous posting here by Trump supporters that can be as high as 200x in a weekend.

Thanks for the clarification.



Lol you gotta stop calling people out for things you do too
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've never posted 200x in a single weekend.
Never.

If you can find any proof of that, I will gladly make a $10,000 donation to the Cal Basketball program.
Let me know.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

I've never posted 200x in a single weekend.
Never.

If you can find any proof of that, I will gladly make a $10,000 donation to the Cal Basketball program.
Let me know.







You're misunderstanding. The amount you post is too 3 on this board. So calling people out for posting a lot is totally dishonest and hypocritical. Thank you for letting me educate you
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[just because, a generic wish, your smiles may vary]
# funk trunk
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:



Is this true or are you posting a lie?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're the last person that should pose such a question, but it seems legitimate.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

You're the last person that should pose such a question, but it seems legitimate.

Which broker did he use to buy puts? Just because you disagree with someone, it doesn't mean they are lying.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

You're the last person that should pose such a question, but it seems legitimate.


Interesting.
And of course, after the erroneous tweet the WTI contract collapsed.

Idiots.




White House: Navy didn't escort oil tanker in Strait of Hormuz

U.S. Navy has not yet escorted ships through Strait of Hormuz, White House says | Reuters

Energy Secretary Deletes Tweet Saying U.S. Escorted Tanker Through Strait of Hormuz
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's shocking that the crude oil market continues to discount this shortfall.

As you know, the "shortfall" in 2022 with Russia/Ukraine conflict was only 3 million barrels and the market got to $120.

Of course, it wasn't really a shortfall that caused that spike as much as it was the "perception" that this oil from Russia never got to the market place, which it in fact did.

But this is an entirely different situation.

If in fact Iran still has 80 - 90% of their swift boats available for laying mines, that's clearly going to be problematic.



smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

chazzed said:

x.com/SeanMcCarthyCom/status/2031432884737769879

Is this true or are you posting a lie?

honestly dunno, 03, but (again) some of us think X is a better avoided snake-pit



alt drop-in..
https://bsky.app
^ rocks, says one fool who likes browsing there instead
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Market is currently in TACO mode but Iran says, I'm not stuck here with you, you're stuck here with me.

We'll see
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Market is currently in TACO mode but Iran says, I'm not stuck here with you, you're stuck here with me.

We'll see


That pretty much sums it up.

American military adventurism in action by an arrogant Administration that doesn't feel like they owe Congress or the American people any explanation.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Market is currently in TACO mode but Iran says, I'm not stuck here with you, you're stuck here with me.

We'll see


That pretty much sums it up.

American military adventurism in action by an arrogant Administration that doesn't feel like they owe Congress or the American people any explanation.



Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first.
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T saying it's oh-kay first.



Yet they haven't passed the Save Act…
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first.



BINGO.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first.



The Iran War is illegal and unconstitutional because Congress has not authorized it.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first..

ohkay, that's enough blather from this fool today (sorry / not sorry)
nighty night y'all, esp to our too generous resident trolls
^ whether paid or not, only their hairdresser knows for shure
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first..

ohkay, that's enough blather from this fool today (sorry / not sorry)
nighty night y'all, esp to our too generous resident trolls
^ whether paid or not, only their hairdresser knows for shure


Agreed 100% smh.
Enjoy your evening!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first.



The Iran War is illegal and unconstitutional because Congress has not authorized it.


Uh do you know how that works? Clearly from this post you do not
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

smh said:

smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first..

ohkay, that's enough blather from this fool today (sorry / not sorry)
nighty night y'all, esp to our too generous resident trolls
^ whether paid or not, only their hairdresser knows for shure


Agreed 100% smh.
Enjoy your evening!



You're the troll big guy
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest


When the Russians start sniping toddlers in the head, I will be the first to condemn them.



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest


When the Russians start sniping toddlers in the head, I will be the first to condemn them.






When the Ukrainians start using children as shields, let me know.

Russia is now in so deep they can't get out without losing face. They have nothing to show for it but dead Russians
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest


When the Russians start sniping toddlers in the head, I will be the first to condemn them.






When the Ukrainians start using children as shields, let me know.


Don't change the subject or strawman, Israelis shoot hundreds of Palestinian kids in the head, and all you have to say about this is that these kids were used as human shields.

Utterly disgusting.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

smh said:

smh said:

BearlySane88 said:

> Congress voted against stopping it so that point is pretty much wrong

this congress can't hardly flush a toilet without T allowing how it's oh-kay first..

ohkay, that's enough blather from this fool today (sorry / not sorry)
nighty night y'all, esp to our too generous resident trolls
^ whether paid or not, only their hairdresser knows for shure


Agreed 100% smh.
Enjoy your evening!



You're the troll big guy


Flagged.
Another personal attack.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest


When the Russians start sniping toddlers in the head, I will be the first to condemn them.






When the Ukrainians start using children as shields, let me know.


Don't change the subject or strawman, Israelis shoot hundreds of Palestinian kids in the head, and all you have to say about this is that these kids were used as human shields.

Utterly disgusting.


Uh yes because they were. When you build your "military" infrastructure around places children are, that's using them as shields

Utterly disgusting that you support that.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:



More Israeli slander


You can't slander Israelis, they do an amazing job of slandering themselves.


You do it multiple times a day all while supporting Russia. Hypocrisy at its finest


When the Russians start sniping toddlers in the head, I will be the first to condemn them.






When the Ukrainians start using children as shields, let me know.


Don't change the subject or strawman, Israelis shoot hundreds of Palestinian kids in the head, and all you have to say about this is that these kids were used as human shields.

Utterly disgusting.


Uh yes because they were. When you build your "military" infrastructure around places children are, that's using them as shields

Utterly disgusting that you support that.


You're trying to squirm yourself out of a disgusting defense of the Israeli snipers practice of sniping kids in the head.

There are no human shields involved when snipers shoot people, they select their target from a safe distance unseen and place their bullets with pinpoint accuracy on their target.

With Israelis as well, every accusation is a confession:















 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.