Election integrity

4,301 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by cal83dls79
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 8:55a, 4/21/26
dajo9 said:
Its important to remember the SAVE Act is not solving a problem. There is no voter fraud problem in this country. The problem we have is too few people vote so we should be making voting more accessible.

My willingness to help my mother is beside the point. Not everyone has reliable, capable family. Your legislation would make my mother dependent on others to be able to vote. The legislation does more harm than good.


It's good she would have you to help her. I'm sure there are agencies that would help others without loved ones
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 1:45p, 4/21/26
dajo9 said:
Its important to remember the SAVE Act is not solving a problem. There is no voter fraud problem in this country. The problem we have is too few people vote so we should be making voting more accessible.

My willingness to help my mother is beside the point. Not everyone has reliable, capable family. Your legislation would make my mother dependent on others to be able to vote. The legislation does more harm than good.

The same Democrats who told us the border was secure is gaslighting you to think there's no voter fraud problem in this country. Photo ID is required to vote in most countries including our neighbors Mexico and Canada.
Reply Quote
4
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 1:18p, 4/25/26


Proof of fraud here

Dajo do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false? Maybe add a "significant" or something to your statement about no voter fraud in this country.

It's expected for you to dismiss things as insignificant but you can't possibly dismiss every documented and proven instance of voter fraud in this country, or can you?
Reply Quote
3
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HawaiiBear33 • 1:25p, 4/25/26
HawaiiBear33 said:


Proof of fraud here

Dajo do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false? Maybe add a "significant" or something to your statement about no voter fraud in this country.

It's expected for you to dismiss things as insignificant but you can't possibly dismiss every documented and proven instance of voter fraud in this country, or can you?


I said there is "no voter fraud problem" and that is absolutely correct. Do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false or are you going to keep up your false claim about what i said?
Reply Quote
1
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 1:34p, 4/25/26
I opine that there is a problem if there is any fraud

There clearly is. It is worse than you admit to yourself.

But I accept your point that using the word "problem" was your clarifier
Reply Quote
3
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:35p, 4/25/26


We should adapt this
Reply Quote
2
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HawaiiBear33 • 8:45p, 4/27/26


Proof of really sketchy shi@

No proof of use for fraud

Please read this short post, verify its accuracy and tell me you can conclude ANYTHING other than it is there to alter elections if needed…
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 9:55p, 4/27/26
dajo9 said:
HawaiiBear33 said:


Proof of fraud here

Dajo do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false? Maybe add a "significant" or something to your statement about no voter fraud in this country.

It's expected for you to dismiss things as insignificant but you can't possibly dismiss every documented and proven instance of voter fraud in this country, or can you?


I said there is "no voter fraud problem" and that is absolutely correct. Do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false or are you going to keep up your false claim about what i said?

But Art Zark said there was fraud in an X post!

LOL, what a joke this country has become
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:03p, 4/27/26
SBGold said:
dajo9 said:
HawaiiBear33 said:


Proof of fraud here

Dajo do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false? Maybe add a "significant" or something to your statement about no voter fraud in this country.

It's expected for you to dismiss things as insignificant but you can't possibly dismiss every documented and proven instance of voter fraud in this country, or can you?


I said there is "no voter fraud problem" and that is absolutely correct. Do you want to add a clarifying word to make your statement not undeniably false or are you going to keep up your false claim about what i said?

But Art Zark said there was fraud in an X post!

LOL, what a joke this country has become


You post the daily beast…
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:37p, 5/4/26
A Washington Post opinion analysis based on Yale research data estimates that the SAVE America Act's proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal voter registration could flip New Mexico from a Democratic win to a 3.3-point Republican advantage.

They could also narrow margins in states like Connecticut, Washington, and Maryland, and strengthen red states further.
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:52a, 5/6/26
Reply Quote
3
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 3:58a, 5/6/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
A Washington Post opinion analysis based on Yale research data estimates that the SAVE America Act's proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal voter registration could flip New Mexico from a Democratic win to a 3.3-point Republican advantage.

They could also narrow margins in states like Connecticut, Washington, and Maryland, and strengthen red states further.
if that doesn't define "Saving America" I don't know what does! Thanks for sharing that study though as it also goes on to conclude that shifts to partisan gaps in possession of citizenship documents like passports or birth certificates (thus, the true states goal of the "SAVE Act") not direct proof of non-citizen voting (because there is scant evidence of "ILLEGALS" voting) nationally, effects are estimated as neutral.

Thanks again for sharing
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 12:41p, 5/6/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:

what?

I thought the protestors were paid and travel for money?

So dumb
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 12:53p, 5/6/26
SBGold said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:

what?

I thought the protestors were paid and travel for money?

So dumb

Are they also paid to stuff ballot boxes?

2000 mules were on a mission,
to rig the election.
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:09p, 5/6/26
Can you summarize the results of any investigation related to election integrity and fraud? Please note applicable trials and convictions please.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN OFTEN
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 4:01p, 5/15/26
SBGold said:
Can you summarize the results of any investigation related to election integrity and fraud? Please note applicable trials and convictions please.

A better exercise is for you to name a single instance of election fraud from the 2020 election.
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:02p, 5/15/26

The problem wasn't that they locked her up while she was sick; Your health status should never make you exempt from punishment.

The problem was that they locked her up for exposing election fraud.
Reply Quote
1
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 4:25p, 5/15/26
When does she get her 7 figure Biden Administration Weaponization of the Legal System Fund check?


*I knew her sister, Fonda.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
chazzed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48p, 5/18/26
Just the primary driver behind this nonsensical push for election reform lying through his teeth.

Reply Quote
3
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:50p, 5/18/26


Reply Quote
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:25a
Just to be clear. The only questionable election results are when dems/libs win. I hope we all get that straight.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
2
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.