If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

dajo9 said:

---

If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

---

Maybe start a war to distract people?

How to say you have no idea how a child welfare check in California works without saying you have no idea how a child welfare check works in California….. has nothing to do with citizenship. Has everything to do with credible evidence of abuse from an accuser willing to make the claim. They don't not show up because there may or may not be an illegal alien in the residence.

dajo9 said:

---

If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

---

Clinton is long gone
Post proof of your libel


Noted that you believe what your programmers tell you and that you seem to support keeping the worst of the worst.


I sure hope you haven't had kids of your own


Choose kindness

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

---

Maybe start a war to distract people?

---

Do you actually believe Iran was to distract from Epstein? Wow. I thought only bots believed that nonsense.


Please post some evidence

🚨 BREAKING: A DEMOCRAT Chicago Alderman just eviscerated his own party and JB Pritzker after an illegal alien killed Sheridan Gorman

"To say it's DONALD TRUMP'S fault simply because we refuse to work with them to go after those high priority targets?!"

"There are 2,000… pic.twitter.com/uR7PMqfM25

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) March 25, 2026

So was this Trumps fault?
Prikzer said so therefore Dajo likely believes it.
Whoever this dem in the interview is seems to think it was otherwise


Choose kindness

HawaiiBear33 said:

---

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

---

Maybe start a war to distract people?

---

Do you actually believe Iran was to distract from Epstein? Wow. I thought only bots believed that nonsense.


Please post some evidence

---

A small part of the motivation for attacking Iran might have been to distract from both Epstein and general failed policies, but, quite honestly, I just can't resist a good set-up line.

Another reason might have been encouragement from Netanyahu.

A third reason might have been that Trump likes the attention he receives from operating as a powerful world leader. Much better photo opps than fighting "affordability"!

Evidence? LOL. What you apparently believe qualifies as "evidence" is links from right wing conspiracy theory sites.

dajo9 said:

---

"Choose kindness" from HawaiiBear33 is actually grade A trolling. Well done.

---

Quote me being unkind- I will apologize if you find one of my posts being unkind
Disagreement and nastiness are different
I don't consider sarcasm unkind either

HawaiiBear33 said:

---

Big C said:

---

HawaiiBear33 said:

---

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

If a pedophile is in the White House what should we do?

---

Maybe start a war to distract people?

---

Do you actually believe Iran was to distract from Epstein? Wow. I thought only bots believed that nonsense.


Please post some evidence

---

A small part of the motivation for attacking Iran might have been to distract from both Epstein and general failed policies, but, quite honestly, I just can't resist a good set-up line.

Another reason might have been encouragement from Netanyahu.

A third reason might have been that Trump likes the attention he receives from operating as a powerful world leader. Much better photo opps than fighting "affordability"!

Evidence? LOL. What you apparently believe qualifies as "evidence" is links from right wing conspiracy theory sites.

---

So you have no evidence and what you say here is from radical left media and politicians-many of whom know they are lying to you

My posts since spring break started are all fact checked. There may be opinion within some of the posts but the facts are legit

In the past I have fallen for some fake crap

---

Correct, I have no "evidence" that Trump started the war with Iran to distract from the Epstein Files.

What I post on BI comes from a combination of sources, combined with my own knowledge and expertise. Sometimes, I am semi-joking around (partially the case above). An example of when I'm mostly joking is my repeated references the past several years to the "pee tape" that is in Putin's possession and that he uses to coerce Trump. Sometimes my posts are 99.9% serious. Your job as a reader to figure out how serious I am being. I don't feel like it is that hard.

I don't frequent any "radical left media" or listen to radical left politicians. I am a somewhat-left-of-center liberal, capitalist and pragmatist. I have been called a "Jerry Brown liberal" and a "Bill Maher liberal"... occasionally also a "bearister liberal".

There, my cards are on the table. Let me ask you a question...

What do you think of this "war" in Iran? Good idea? Bad idea? Remains to be seen?

And why?

Tedhead94 the II said:

---

How to say you have no idea how a child welfare check in California works without saying you have no idea how a child welfare check works in California….. has nothing to do with citizenship. Has everything to do with credible evidence of abuse from an accuser willing to make the claim. They don't not show up because there may or may not be an illegal alien in the residence.

---

Routine child welfare checks are not outright banned in California sanctuary jurisdictions under SB-54, however, the law creates significant restrictions that can complicate or block them in practiceespecially when the situation involves illegal immigrants, federal immigration authorities, or unaccompanied minors whose cases might overlap with immigration enforcement.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Tedhead94 the II said:

---

How to say you have no idea how a child welfare check in California works without saying you have no idea how a child welfare check works in California….. has nothing to do with citizenship. Has everything to do with credible evidence of abuse from an accuser willing to make the claim. They don't not show up because there may or may not be an illegal alien in the residence.

---

Routine child welfare checks are not outright banned in California sanctuary jurisdictions under SB-54, however, the law creates significant restrictions that can complicate or block them in practiceespecially when the situation involves illegal immigrants, federal immigration authorities, or unaccompanied minors whose cases might overlap with immigration enforcement.

---

How so?

The OP contends that we know an illegal immigrant is sex trafficking a child. If local law enforcement or federal law enforcemen "knows" person X is sex trafficking person Y they should be able to present their evidence to a local or federal judge and get a judicial warrant to search the house. 54 does not impede this in any way. If you "know" this is happening you act. Illegal alien status is irrelevant on the execution in this scenario. So is 54.

The OP is idiotic, click bait with no substance.

A child welfare check is when you don't "know" but have a credible, reliable source that is willing to report the abuse. If they are unable, or unwilling to cooperate then a welfare check can't be done. Has nothing to do with immigration statuses. Has nothing to do with 54.

The dude in the OP knows this but he also knows people will be lazy not think through the obvious ridiculousness of what he is saying, then repost it for other lazy minds to believe it.