Off Topic
Sponsored by

Important outcome in Brazil

2,623 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by oski003
FreeRangeBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

SBGold said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

dajo9 said:

Great win for democracy in Brazil. Voting hours were extended because Bolsonaro Mayors shut down public transport in Lula areas. Note how the fascist Bolsonaro's tried to suppress the vote and the Lula side tried to assist voting.

This is a big blow to the international fascist movement led by Putin. I hope Lula follows up on his commitment to jail Mayors who shut down public transport just like he jailed papa Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow an election. As a fascist, junior Bolsonaro has not conceded, which is not a crime. But as soon as he commits a crime he belongs in jail too.

It's okay to skirt the law and go to your buddy in high places if it helps the candidate you like? Nobody is more hypocritical than a Democrat.


The law breaking was when the fascists shut down public transportation. The courts provided legal remedies.

This is what good courts do. Thankful they did their job.

vote blue and stamp out the right wing

Good courts? It was one rogue judge who use to be Lula's personal lawyer. The exact opposite of what a good court should do.


How come you folks never address the criminal voter suppression from the Bolsonaro Mayors? The Judge provided a fair judicial remedy.


When you don't go through the proper channels, it makes the rest fishy. The judge made a decision that wasn't theirs to make. They have an election board and election judges for a reason. If they had done things appropriately, it would have saved them a lot of this headache of it being called a sham election. They also might not have won so ya know…


The judge went outside of the Democratic process to circumvent the appropriate channels and obtain the result he wanted. As corrupt as it comes.


They won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

I see, you're a troll.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FreeRangeBear said:

dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

SBGold said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

dajo9 said:

Great win for democracy in Brazil. Voting hours were extended because Bolsonaro Mayors shut down public transport in Lula areas. Note how the fascist Bolsonaro's tried to suppress the vote and the Lula side tried to assist voting.

This is a big blow to the international fascist movement led by Putin. I hope Lula follows up on his commitment to jail Mayors who shut down public transport just like he jailed papa Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow an election. As a fascist, junior Bolsonaro has not conceded, which is not a crime. But as soon as he commits a crime he belongs in jail too.

It's okay to skirt the law and go to your buddy in high places if it helps the candidate you like? Nobody is more hypocritical than a Democrat.


The law breaking was when the fascists shut down public transportation. The courts provided legal remedies.

This is what good courts do. Thankful they did their job.

vote blue and stamp out the right wing

Good courts? It was one rogue judge who use to be Lula's personal lawyer. The exact opposite of what a good court should do.


How come you folks never address the criminal voter suppression from the Bolsonaro Mayors? The Judge provided a fair judicial remedy.


When you don't go through the proper channels, it makes the rest fishy. The judge made a decision that wasn't theirs to make. They have an election board and election judges for a reason. If they had done things appropriately, it would have saved them a lot of this headache of it being called a sham election. They also might not have won so ya know…


The judge went outside of the Democratic process to circumvent the appropriate channels and obtain the result he wanted. As corrupt as it comes.


They won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

I see, you're a troll.


I'm calling out the trolls who won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors
FreeRangeBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

SBGold said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

dajo9 said:

Great win for democracy in Brazil. Voting hours were extended because Bolsonaro Mayors shut down public transport in Lula areas. Note how the fascist Bolsonaro's tried to suppress the vote and the Lula side tried to assist voting.

This is a big blow to the international fascist movement led by Putin. I hope Lula follows up on his commitment to jail Mayors who shut down public transport just like he jailed papa Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow an election. As a fascist, junior Bolsonaro has not conceded, which is not a crime. But as soon as he commits a crime he belongs in jail too.

It's okay to skirt the law and go to your buddy in high places if it helps the candidate you like? Nobody is more hypocritical than a Democrat.


The law breaking was when the fascists shut down public transportation. The courts provided legal remedies.

This is what good courts do. Thankful they did their job.

vote blue and stamp out the right wing

Good courts? It was one rogue judge who use to be Lula's personal lawyer. The exact opposite of what a good court should do.


How come you folks never address the criminal voter suppression from the Bolsonaro Mayors? The Judge provided a fair judicial remedy.


When you don't go through the proper channels, it makes the rest fishy. The judge made a decision that wasn't theirs to make. They have an election board and election judges for a reason. If they had done things appropriately, it would have saved them a lot of this headache of it being called a sham election. They also might not have won so ya know…


The judge went outside of the Democratic process to circumvent the appropriate channels and obtain the result he wanted. As corrupt as it comes.


They won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

I see, you're a troll.


I'm calling out the trolls who won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

You are being a troll, you were asked to explain your point more than once and you chose not to. I don't think anyone here can do anything about mayors in Brazil
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FreeRangeBear said:

dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

dajo9 said:

FreeRangeBear said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

SBGold said:

dajo9 said:

B.D.Bear said:

dajo9 said:

Great win for democracy in Brazil. Voting hours were extended because Bolsonaro Mayors shut down public transport in Lula areas. Note how the fascist Bolsonaro's tried to suppress the vote and the Lula side tried to assist voting.

This is a big blow to the international fascist movement led by Putin. I hope Lula follows up on his commitment to jail Mayors who shut down public transport just like he jailed papa Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow an election. As a fascist, junior Bolsonaro has not conceded, which is not a crime. But as soon as he commits a crime he belongs in jail too.

It's okay to skirt the law and go to your buddy in high places if it helps the candidate you like? Nobody is more hypocritical than a Democrat.


The law breaking was when the fascists shut down public transportation. The courts provided legal remedies.

This is what good courts do. Thankful they did their job.

vote blue and stamp out the right wing

Good courts? It was one rogue judge who use to be Lula's personal lawyer. The exact opposite of what a good court should do.


How come you folks never address the criminal voter suppression from the Bolsonaro Mayors? The Judge provided a fair judicial remedy.


When you don't go through the proper channels, it makes the rest fishy. The judge made a decision that wasn't theirs to make. They have an election board and election judges for a reason. If they had done things appropriately, it would have saved them a lot of this headache of it being called a sham election. They also might not have won so ya know…


The judge went outside of the Democratic process to circumvent the appropriate channels and obtain the result he wanted. As corrupt as it comes.


They won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

I see, you're a troll.


I'm calling out the trolls who won't address the criminal behavior of the Bolsonaro Mayors

You are being a troll, you were asked to explain your point more than once and you chose not to. I don't think anyone here can do anything about mayors in Brazil


It's not about the Bolsonaro Mayors. It's the people who won't acknowledge what they've done, which is tacit support
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't look now, but it appears like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Flavio Bolsonaro headed to the US after losing Brazil election, sources say
B.D.Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will Flavio Bolsonaro and Bibi be roommates in exile in suites at Mar a Lago?

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone rooting against Bibi is in for a surprise when they find out his opponent has called for even harsher treatment of Palestinians.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This ain't democracy, Brazil.





bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Anyone rooting against Bibi is in for a surprise when they find out his opponent has called for even harsher treatment of Palestinians.

Harsher than the 62:1 kill ratio Bibi inflicted on Gaza in reprisal for the October 7 terror attack?

Unlike Netanyahu's current far-right coalition partners who openly advocate for the formal annexation of the West Bank, Eisenkot favors preserving areas of Palestinian civil self-rule.

He supports Israeli settlement blocs in principle. However, he opposes unauthorized outposts, construction in the sensitive E1 zone (which would cut off East Jerusalem from the West Bank), and has pledged a strict crackdown on settler violence against Palestinians.

*He is basically the lesser of two evils. I'm assuming he is less corrupt.

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

BearlySane88 said:

Anyone rooting against Bibi is in for a surprise when they find out his opponent has called for even harsher treatment of Palestinians.

Harsher than the 62:1 kill ratio Bibi inflicted on Gaza in reprisal for the October 7 terror attack?

Unlike Netanyahu's current far-right coalition partners who openly advocate for the formal annexation of the West Bank, Eisenkot favors preserving areas of Palestinian civil self-rule.

He supports Israeli settlement blocs in principle. However, he opposes unauthorized outposts, construction in the sensitive E1 zone (which would cut off East Jerusalem from the West Bank), and has pledged a strict crackdown on settler violence against Palestinians.

*He is basically the lesser of two evils. I'm assuming he is less corrupt.




There are really only two issues that matter. Do either support Palestinian statehood? No. Do either support Palestinian self rule? No.

Currently it's too close to call according to exit polls.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's see how this plays out.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

BearlySane88 said:

Anyone rooting against Bibi is in for a surprise when they find out his opponent has called for even harsher treatment of Palestinians.

Harsher than the 62:1 kill ratio Bibi inflicted on Gaza in reprisal for the October 7 terror attack?

Unlike Netanyahu's current far-right coalition partners who openly advocate for the formal annexation of the West Bank, Eisenkot favors preserving areas of Palestinian civil self-rule.

He supports Israeli settlement blocs in principle. However, he opposes unauthorized outposts, construction in the sensitive E1 zone (which would cut off East Jerusalem from the West Bank), and has pledged a strict crackdown on settler violence against Palestinians.

*He is basically the lesser of two evils. I'm assuming he is less corrupt.




There are really only two issues that matter. Do either support Palestinian statehood? No. Do either support Palestinian self rule? No.

Currently it's too close to call according to exit polls.


Third issue: Bibi
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.



I had no idea B.D. Bear was such a baller. Wow.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.




Nobody here on this board had anything to do with this as BD said.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.




Nobody here on this board had anything to do with this as BD said.
I will admit that I steadfastly refused to let Bolsonaro and his family visit my house. I also refused to issue a Visa or a MasterCard but I did say I'd investigate a Discover Card.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.




Nobody here on this board had anything to do with this as BD said.

I will admit that I steadfastly refused to let Bolsonaro and his family visit my house. I also refused to issue a Visa or a MasterCard but I did say I'd investigate a Discover Card.


There is some brilliant reading comprehension on OT.
No doubt about it.

I didn't let Bolsonaro visit my home either.
He wanted to go for a drive in my Porsche, but I wouldnt let him.

Lmao.



cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump having now finished up with pedophelia, is now curating/collecting a menagerie of strongmen:

https://www.wsj.com/world/americas/how-bolsonaro-fled-brazil-decoys-a-private-jet-and-a-friend-in-the-white-house-a752b829?st=zFyK8A
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

B.D.Bear said:

DiabloWags said:

Don't look now, but it looks like someone "here" just did something for Bolsonaro.




Nobody here had anything to do with it but this is great news


I beg to differ.




Nobody here on this board had anything to do with this as BD said.

I will admit that I steadfastly refused to let Bolsonaro and his family visit my house. I also refused to issue a Visa or a MasterCard but I did say I'd investigate a Discover Card.


There is some brilliant reading comprehension on OT.
No doubt about it.

I didn't let Bolsonaro visit my home either.
He wanted to go for a drive in my Porsche, but I wouldnt let him.

Lmao.





This looks like a case of you expecting others to comprehend something that simply isn't there because of poor middle school writing. Making jokes about Visas and having a Porsche doesn't change this.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"BREAKING Trump says he wants to shut our borders to criminals but per the NYT he smuggles Bolsonaro INTO the US - a wannabe Brazilian autocrat under criminal investigation.
Speaks volumes."
Andrew Weissmann
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"BREAKING Trump says he wants to shut our borders to criminals but per the NYT he smuggles Bolsonaro INTO the US - a wannabe Brazilian autocrat under criminal investigation.
Speaks volumes."
Andrew Weissmann



Allowing someone who has not been convicted of a crime to enter the United States legally is not inconsistent with enforcing immigration laws against unauthorized entry.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

"BREAKING Trump says he wants to shut our borders to criminals but per the NYT he smuggles Bolsonaro INTO the US - a wannabe Brazilian autocrat under criminal investigation.
Speaks volumes."
Andrew Weissmann



Allowing someone who has not been convicted of a crime to enter the United States legally is not inconsistent with enforcing immigration laws against unauthorized entry.

Right.

No brown skinned person has ever been detained or arrested by ICE unless they've been convicted of a crime.
Even brown skinned American citizens.

This is totally consistent with Trump's enforcement of immigration laws.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

"BREAKING Trump says he wants to shut our borders to criminals but per the NYT he smuggles Bolsonaro INTO the US - a wannabe Brazilian autocrat under criminal investigation.
Speaks volumes."
Andrew Weissmann



Allowing someone who has not been convicted of a crime to enter the United States legally is not inconsistent with enforcing immigration laws against unauthorized entry.

Right.

No brown skinned person has ever been detained or arrested by ICE unless they've been convicted of a crime.
Even brown skinned American citizens.

This is totally consistent with Trump's enforcement of immigration laws.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.




Bearister specifically said criminals and I responded to that point. Where your tangent came from, I have no clue.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:

"BREAKING Trump says he wants to shut our borders to criminals but per the NYT he smuggles Bolsonaro INTO the US - a wannabe Brazilian autocrat under criminal investigation.
Speaks volumes."
Andrew Weissmann



Allowing someone who has not been convicted of a crime to enter the United States legally is not inconsistent with enforcing immigration laws against unauthorized entry.

Right.

No brown skinned person has ever been detained or arrested by ICE unless they've been convicted of a crime.
Even brown skinned American citizens.

This is totally consistent with Trump's enforcement of immigration laws.
Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.




Bearister specifically said criminals and I responded to that point. Where your tangent came from, I have no clue.


Yes, whatever point he had was irrelevant or at least illogical when applied to your post.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.