Off Topic
Sponsored by

Democratic Priorities

1,413 Views | 27 Replies | Last: 19 hrs ago by dajo9
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The punditry focus on Dems focusing on Federal policy action is a recipe for disappointment. This is still a country in which the most powerful person in the land is the President. On a Federal level Dems should be able to limit the excesses of ICE and restore ACA subsidies and limit tariffs, greatly improving an affordability issue for millions of Americans. However they won't be able to do much more, including on the Iran War, typically an area in which the President reigns supreme. Attempts to eliminate funding are likely to backfire as imperiling our troops (as much as I would support it, it is probably bad politics).

One area in which Congress has a direct role is oversight and Dems should aggressively pursue that role. In addition we need a Congressional inquiry on the DOGE debacle and a special prosecutor on the MAGA Epstein cover up in violation of the law Congress passed in the last session.

The matter of impeachment should be pursued where appropriate for anybody. This should always be true of all Congress's in all times.

Bigger progress will hopefully be achieved at the state and local level. Newly blue states can hopefully expand Medicaid access to millions of Americans. Women's rights can hopefully be restored. Minimum wages can hopefully be raised. Hopefully Nithya Raman will win in Los Angeles and she will hopefully be able to follow Mamdani's lead in productive, succesful change at the city level. It as at the state and local level that this blue wave can show what Democrats can do for Americans.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems will have to win the battle against themselves first. They usually do a better job of that than republicans so time will tell.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Impeach Trump and Hegseth right away. Not doing so would be malpractice.

Also, they should begin the process of bringing back USAID. Republicans have become anti-lifers who do not care about utilizing soft power. They really set the U.S. back in that regard, too.
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/maga-is-over-22512069.php

"Can you feel the joy, dear reader? I can. Tuesday night, voters nationwide handed the Democratic Party decisive power in both chambers of Congress. Democrats won in California, as they always do. But they also won in Michigan, and Georgia, and Wisconsin, and Texas. They might even win in Mississippi once all of the ballots are tallied. Mississippi! I didn't even know they HAD voting in Mississippi! Holy crap! I wanna kiss all of you on the mouth, I'm so happy!

Now, what happened Tuesday night doesn't automatically correct everything that's happened over the past decade and beyond. You and I will still have to call out the usual suspects whenever the Democratic establishment gives into its eternally timid instincts. Some of those party regulars have already pre-caved. But that's for another day. Regardless, today is for joy. Today is for you and I to pop bubbly with breakfast and hold our middle fingers aloft at the lame, overweight duck in the White House. Today is a day for celebration.

In that spirit, I've cobbled together a quick to-do list for our new blue majority government. I bring you these demands as a voter, not a political analyst. Do not expect me to outline how I want all of the following things accomplished. That's not my problem, Democrats. Figuring out the how of things is what I and my fellow taxpayers are paying you to sort out. I never want you to tell me why you can't do something anymore. Not after we just colonized Texas … emphatically.


Like Jon Rosenthal the Democrat who just kicked a bigoted cowboy's ass to win a seat on the Texas Railroad Commission I'm feeling myself this morning. I was a VERY good voter this year, blue Santa Claus. Most of us were. Therefore, you're gonna have to bring us everything that's on our wish list, which I've written down below in loose priority order.

Fix the Supreme Court! Nothing about Tuesday night will amount to anything as long as President Trump can go running to his lackeys on the bench to overturn any new law he dislikes, to suddenly legalize sexual assault, or to magically bestow upon Trump the power of wingless flight. I am sick to death of SCOTUS being the most actively malevolent political force in this supposedly free country. So first things first: Fix it. Again, the how is your problem, Dems. Not mine. If it means expanding the court to 24 judges, College Football Playoff-style, do it. If it means instituting term limits, so that an allegedly handsy fossil like Clarence Thomas can't rule over our lives for 35 years and counting, do it. Or if it means impeaching evidentially corrupt justices like Thomas and the dreaded Sammy Alito, do that too. Speaking of which …



Lock 'em up! You and I have already endured two failed impeachment attempts on President Stands Weird, so I understand why you might groan at anyone who tells you that the third time will be the charm. But America can't have a functional government if our new woke overlords allow proven criminals to get away with their evildoing. You saw Tuesday night's returns. That wasn't voters saying, "Maybe we should go easy on dear old Donald." That was America screaming, "WE WANT BLOOD."


Because Trump has presided over a still ongoing crime spree at the highest level of government, and the only way to prevent him and future leaders from committing more atrocities is to, you know, prosecute them. All of them. Not just Trump. I want the hammer to also fall on Alito, on Thomas, on Elon, on that zooted-up scumbag Pete Hegseth, and well, look, it's a long list and the internet only has so much memory storage. Even with all those shiny new data centers going up, there's still not enough room for me to name every name. But you get the idea.

Ban all of the data centers! We hate those, too!

Overturn Citizens United! Would you like to know why, on an otherwise lovely night, Californians rejected a tax on the state's billionaires? Or how the discourse around the Michigan Senate race got sidetracked by Israel, which is not in Michigan? Through the magic of donations, that's how. Ever since the Supreme Court there those *******s are again decided in 2010 that campaign finance restrictions were somehow a violation of free speech, the American political system has been wholly captured by big-money interests, from Israel to Mark Zuckerberg. Last year, a trio of Democrats proposed an amendment to overturn this disastrous SCOTUS decision. If they can get this amendment through with a majority now, it will end the essentially legalized bribery that has poisoned all political parties this century. That might give America the chance to be an actual democracy again.

Abolish ICE. Tell 'em, Peggy Flanagan:


I don't want a kinder, gentler ICE. I don't want a better-trained ICE. I want no ICE, and I want any ICE goons who killed innocent people to be put in the slammer. Again, we can't move forward as a country if we don't hold the bad guys accountable. And we know who the bad guys are, because they all have X accounts where they confess on a daily basis. Time to put them out of commission.

End the Iran War. It was an illegal war from the very outset, and it has accomplished less than nothing. So let's take the war keys away from Trump and give him a Whoozit to play with instead. Listen to how it squeaks, Mister President! They're saying it's the greatest toy ever invented!

Legalize abortion! I'm a 50-year-old man, and even I wanna get an abortion now. I should have that right! After all, you never know!

End monopolies! I'm nursing a theory that Americans actually like monopolies because the board game taught them that monopolies are good. That is incorrect. I'd prefer there be MANY companies to get my news and entertainment from, instead of just one owned by some billionaire's ******* kid. These monopolies are the reason why I need to take out a home equity loan just to afford my groceries. If Democrats really care about affordability, as they claim, breaking up the big boys is the first step.

Let the AI giants fail! Their product is crap, it eats up generations' worth of energy, and it doesn't make any money! So I don't wanna hear about how we have to bail out Sam Altman and OpenAI to the tune of literal trillions because we might lose 300 jobs or whatever if they go bust. I'd rather that money be used toward far more promising endeavors, like:

Make college free! We were on our way there until our garbage president got in the way.

Make healthcare free! That includes abortions, and not just boner pills!

Make mass transit free! I wanna ride more choo choo trains!

DO IT NOW
Make daycare free! Or pay my ass to stay home and raise these little *******s myself!

Make NFL Sunday Ticket free! That one's just for me, really.

Clean up Washington, D.C.! I mean this in the literal sense. Even if you live far away from the nation's capital, you're likely aware of the myriad ways in which Trump has desecrated it. He destroyed the Reflecting Pool. He destroyed the Kennedy Center. He destroyed a local public golf course. He's destroying whatever portions of the Smithsonian he finds distasteful. And, of course, he's bulldozed the East Wing of the White House in order to build a ballroom/war bunker/casino/Best Buy outlet. Just as you and I are represented by the people working in D.C., we're also represented by the physical landscape of D.C. itself: the buildings, the museums, the monuments … all of it. The ruined D.C. that Trump is currently attempting to remodel in his bloated image is emblematic of the widespread damage he's wrought on the nation itself. So please Democrats, give D.C. back to the American people. And don't let Trump build that fking arch. This is a celebration, and he's not invited."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Impeach Trump and Hegseth right away. Not doing so would be malpractice.

Also, they should begin the process of bringing back USAID. Republicans have become anti-lifers who do not care about utilizing soft power. They really set the U.S. back in that regard, too.


The fact that your first reaction is to impeach Trump is the attitude that will lead dems to do nothing for the next two years
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a ridiculous guideline. The first point of order is to stack a court that has already sided with dems on most of the largest issues. Again, dems will accomplish nothing if this is how they handle the next two years
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Personally, I don't have a lot of appetite for impeachment. At least not if it's just going to be a show trial that goes nowhere. We did that already, and Trump is a lame duck now. Of course, if Trump does something really bad and you think you have enough Republican support to actually succeed, then you can go nuts. Otherwise, what's the point?

Investigations and hearings about some of the obvious corruption and self-dealing by the administration and the Trump family? Yes, I think the public would welcome that.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As much as it was anti- Trump it was also anti- establishment on the Dem side. Lining up behind two genocide supporters from New York isn't going to be a walk in the park.
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/04/donald-trump-billionaire-coalition-class-politics-tech-us-democrats


"As tech bosses get richer and ordinary Americans struggle, Democrats put the case against the US's grotesque unfairness and voters responded

Wed 4 Nov 2026 13.18 EST

Remember the "vibe shift"? Just last year, columnists and corporate boardrooms alike declared that the second coming of Donald Trump meant the old rules of politics and even everyday civility were roadkill.

"I feel liberated," one top banker told the Financial Times. "We can say '******' and '*****' without the fear of getting cancelled … it's a new dawn."

Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, but to be a billionaire was very heaven. Because in Trump, the tech bosses had a politician who could work magic by forging a forever alliance between them and blue-collar America. This was the very core of Trumpism, the trick that wowed rightwingers around the world: how he could yoke together minimum-wage workers with the 1%; Latinos and black voters with those happy to dabble in a little light racism; the Epstein-haters with the Epstein class (who can forget Elon Musk's email to Jeffrey: "What day/night will be the wildest party on your island?"). And he did it by alchemising class antagonism into culture war. Forget about that pay rise have you have heard about those Haitians eating dogs?

Silicon Valley, Wall Street and east coast media owners all saw Trumpism not as a political strategy but as a turn in the entire culture: a vibe shift to the right. They were wrong. Tuesday night was a comprehensive rejection of the president. Before the midterms, ultra-wealthy donors such as Musk poured billions into Trump's proxies, but the working- and middle-class base were not having it. The relatively new coalition that put the orange man in the White House has been smashed apart by old-fashioned class politics.

When election analysts observe that the struggle of ordinary Americans to afford the basics of life now "polls in a tier by itself", that is class rearing its head. It is a response to the record petrol prices in a car-centred society, the huge swings in everything from eggs to mincemeat, the battle to meet the rent. The squeamish, including within the Democratic establishment, might euphemise these as "economic issues" or "affordability", but remember that this time last year, the democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani turned affordability from a meme into a platform for winning elections. In late 2026, and going into the next battle for the White House, the New York mayor now wields national influence.

Among Mamdani's achievements has been his reminder to ordinary voters that when they can't afford the basics, it's not just because prices are unreasonably high it's also because their pay is unfairly low. He has tied the cost of living to an argument about inequality, and rightly so.

Over decades through Reagan and Clinton, Bush and Obama Republicans and Democrats have changed the tax code to reward ownership rather than earning, so the richest 400 households now pay lower rates of tax than the bottom 50% of Americans. As the radical economists Fred Magdoff and John Bellamy Foster show in their new book, Grand Theft Capital: What Workers Should Know About the Affordability Crisis, the share of national income going to ordinary workers has slumped from 30% in the 1960s to 20% today. This is the destruction of working-class lives and dreams in which Republicans and Democrats colluded. This is the American carnage that in 2016 helped propel Trump into the White House. But the most glaring feature of this era of Trumponomics has been its shameless inequality.

The "hottest country in the world", as the president calls it, relies on AI for growth. For the first half of 2025, the Harvard economist Jason Furman estimated that spending on AI infrastructure made up 92% of GDP growth. These supposedly national gains are getting raked off by a tiny number of people and funds, based overwhelmingly in one strip on the west coast.

In October, the fund manager Apollo pointed out that, of the entire S&P index of America's biggest 500 companies, only the so-called "magnificent seven" tech firms were flourishing. The other 493 were seeing flat revenues and flat profits. Torsten Slok, Apollo's chief economist, wrote: "Despite massive investments and widespread hype around artificial intelligence, the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America."

Billions for Sam Altman and Dario Amodei and Jensen Huang; a pittance for those outside Silicon Valley. No wonder the most reviled candidate on so many of this week's ballots was the datacentre: the energy-sapping, water-sucking, community-destroying datacentre that merely aids the processing of humans into appendages to chatbots. Analysis for the Economist showed that Trump supporters with a datacentre on their doorstep were flipping in droves to the other side.

The politics of this played out most clearly in Texas, which on Tuesday night flipped from red to blue, despite a quarter of a billion dollars for the Republicans in the state from one man: Elon Musk. Texas is the AI overlord's home and a vital base for his businesses. Over the next few years Texas is expected to become the US's centre for datacentres. In just two years, it is expected to provide over a quarter of all new computing power to the AI industry. James Talarico won on a squarely anti-datacentre agenda.

As he said after his win: "The real fight in this country is not left versus right. It is top versus bottom … The people at the top divide us by party, by race, by gender, by religion, by culture, so we don't notice that they are picking our pockets. But tonight, we sent a crystal clear message to the people at the top, we will not be conquered."

The Democrats who caught the national and global imagination this autumn were those who most stridently put the case against the US's grotesque, life-destroying unfairness and for a better politics just as Mamdani did. Troy Jackson won Maine on a platform to abolish ICE. Abdul El-Sayed took Michigan (Michigan!) pledging Medicare for all.

These results suggest a new future for the Dems: anti-corruption, anti-war and anti-billionaire. In the days of Bill and Hillary, this would have been deemed impossibly leftwing. But mark my words: the Democrat who wants to get on the ticket in 2028 will sound more like Bernie Sanders.

For now, rejoice that a corrupt self-dealing bully is heading into two years of ignominy, of being treated even while in power as a back number. And remember that when politicians and journalists claim there is nothing better on offer than the same old rightwing rubbish, they're usually wrong. "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?" Trump once said. "It's, like, incredible."

And truly, it wasn't credible."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The cracks are already forming

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

The cracks are already forming




I completely agree with El Sayed
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems should work on HEALTHCARE.

And overturning all of Trump's attacks on the environment.

For starters.



Cults don't end well. Think Jonestown.


wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Personally, I don't have a lot of appetite for impeachment. At least not if it's just going to be a show trial that goes nowhere. We did that already, and Trump is a lame duck now. Of course, if Trump does something really bad and you think you have enough Republican support to actually succeed, then you can go nuts. Otherwise, what's the point?

Investigations and hearings about some of the obvious corruption and self-dealing by the administration and the Trump family? Yes, I think the public would welcome that.

I expect hearings into corruption, etc. - that is Congress' job. Making Vance an incumbent when he runs in 2028 is stupidity.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Job #1 in my book?

Must secure the presidency and retain both chambers in 2028.

Only then can they fix so much of what Trump broken. Spend two years submitting the bills that ONLY they will pass once they win the WH.

Campaign for two years:
"Trump broke this.
We are attempting to fix it.
We passed this bill.
Trump vetoed it.
Republicans refuse to overturn his veto.
Vote us the WH in 2028 if you want this fixed."

Then list all the problem areas:
Profiteering by first family.
Stock trading of elected officials.
Foreign wars. Congress power.
Limit power of executive branch.
The deficit.
The border.
…
The list could be 100 items long - Trump broke so much!!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would also like to see Congress push for a Constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United. It should be framed as anti-corruption and anti-1%. It should also have some language solidifying corruption and bribery charges since our corrupt Republican Supreme Court made a bribery charge almost impossible. Let the Republicans in Congress fight to protect big money and bribery.

If it passes it should go to state ratifying conventions, bypassing the legislatures.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

since our corrupt Republican Supreme Court



The Supreme Court is not corrupt and has decided against Trump on many major issues.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

since our corrupt Republican Supreme Court



The Supreme Court is not corrupt and has decided against Trump on many major issues.


Please get over your TDS. Lame Donald Duck is not the driving force anymore.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

since our corrupt Republican Supreme Court



The Supreme Court is not corrupt and has decided against Trump on many major issues.


Please get over your TDS. Lame Donald Duck is not the driving force anymore.


It is when you all claim the court is biased towards him and the facts clearly show it isn't.

Trump is still the driving force for the next two years, hate to break it to you.
prospeCt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/nov/04/democrats-elected-us-awakening


"The real question in my mind is whether Democrats will take advantage of the new age of populism

Wed 4 Nov 2026 14.03 EST

The great sleeping giant of the US has awakened, taken a hard look at what's become of the nation, and roared a thunderous "NO!"

What occurred on Tuesday was not as some are saying the inevitable midterm swing of the pendulum against the party in power. Texas hasn't elected a Democratic senator since 1988. The last time Kansas elected a Democratic senator was 1932.

Nor was it just the economy. Americans are unhappy with high prices, to be sure, but inflation isn't out of control. The country is not in a depression or recession. Unemployment remains quite low.

Nor, finally, was it all due to Donald Trump. Despite Trump's repeated efforts to get voters to "pretend" he was on the ballot, he was not. Most Republican candidates barely mentioned him and many Democratic candidates stressed local or statewide issues rather than fixate on him.

Something much larger is responsible for what occurred: anti-establishment populism. It's burst forth against the mammoth corporations that have scored record profits while most Americans have had to pay more. Against the mega donors and super Pacs that have flooded US politics with more campaign money legalized bribes than ever before.

And against the big tech billionaires who have become the most powerful force in the US economy and society as well as Trump's and the Republican party's most visible backers.

The irony is that anti-establishment anger propelled Trump into the presidency in 2016 and again in 2024. Many Americans had found his politically incorrect rants and "America first" nativism to reflect their own anger at being disrespected and left behind. "I am your warrior," he told supporters when he announced his candidacy for the 2024 election.

But during his second term, Trump has morphed into the very establishment he had railed against. He gave tax cuts and subsidies to tech billionaires. He's promoted their AI, pushed their datacenters, put Elon Musk in charge of the so-called "department of government efficiency" (Doge), advocated their crypto, and went to war in the Middle East not only causing gas prices to soar but making big oil billions (or, as Trump bafflingly boasts, "we're making an absolute fortune in our country") and enriching big tech weapons makers and investors, including his family.

Many who voted for Trump in 2016 and 2024 have now abandoned him because of this blatant corruption, crony capitalism and eagerness to be on the gilded side of the US's new Gilded Age. According to CNBC's late October poll, corruption was the top issue on voters' minds.

Meanwhile, anti-establishment populism has taken firm hold in the Democratic party. "The biggest divide in this country is not left versus right," said the newly elected Texas Senate candidate James Talarico. "It's top versus bottom."

Sherrod Brown regained his Senate seat from Ohio largely due to voter anger at datacenters and the big tech billionaires behind them.

Abdul El-Sayed never tired on the campaign trail of reminding Michigan voters that his opponent, Mike Rogers, was backed by big corporations and mega donors.

Even Kansas's victorious Adam Hamilton who during his run for the Senate adamantly rejected the leftist label his opponent wanted to impose on him campaigned on making datacenters pay for their own energy, banning lawmakers from trading stocks, expanding Medicare drug-price negotiations, and cracking down on price-gouging.

Hamilton also rejected money from corporate Pacs, as did most Democratic candidates for the Senate.

The real question in my mind is whether, come January when they control Congress, Democrats will take advantage of the new populism to enact measures most Americans need, such as Medicare for All, and reforms most Americans want, such as tougher anti-monopoly laws and limits on campaign contributions (even if this requires a constitutional amendment).

Trump is likely to veto any such initiatives, of course, but at least they'll lay down markers for the 2028 presidential election which, judging from what we've seen in the midterms, is likely to be a populist doozie."
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Schumer is a guy Trump likes and can work with. It would be zero surprise if the two cooked up something
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



Schumer is a guy Trump likes and can work with. It would be zero surprise if the two cooked up something

Two old New York buddies just working things out!
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:



Schumer is a guy Trump likes and can work with. It would be zero surprise if the two cooked up something

Two old New York buddies just working things out!


Trump didn't become a successful developer without working with and paying off Dems, plus he doesn't care about ideology, nor Republicans. I can see him making a deal on health care in return for a vanity project.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



Schumer is a guy Trump likes and can work with. It would be zero surprise if the two cooked up something


Schumer would probably cut a deal letting Trump pick a Supreme Court justice and in the process would incinerate the minds of 70% of Democrats. He needs to be out of leadership.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Anarchistbear said:



Schumer is a guy Trump likes and can work with. It would be zero surprise if the two cooked up something


Schumer would probably cut a deal letting Trump pick a Supreme Court justice and in the process would incinerate the minds of 70% of Democrats. He needs to be out of leadership.


The infighting will be legendary
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeffries is as bad, also endorsed by a genocdal foreign power, complicit in their atrocities and a bag man for AIPAC

"Hakeem Jeffries will lead the House of Representatives. Chuck Schumer will run the Senate. Both are my friends; both voted with Israel this year even when the majority of their party caucus voted otherwise. They're exactly the kind of leaders Israel should know how to work with, even if we don't agree on everything. "

Yair Lapid leader of the opposition in Israel


dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Jeffries is as bad, also endorsed by a genocdal foreign power, complicit in their atrocities qnd and a bag man for AIPAC

"Hakeem Jeffries will lead the House of Representatives. Chuck Schumer will run the Senate. Both are my friends; both voted with Israel this year even when the majority of their party caucus voted otherwise. They're exactly the kind of leaders Israel should know how to work with, even if we don't agree on everything. "

Yair Lapid leader of the opposition in Israel





Jeffries also needs to go. The 2026 election will not be complete with the old leadership of failure. We need new leadership to deliver on our new mandate.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Anarchistbear said:

Jeffries is as bad, also endorsed by a genocdal foreign power, complicit in their atrocities qnd and a bag man for AIPAC

"Hakeem Jeffries will lead the House of Representatives. Chuck Schumer will run the Senate. Both are my friends; both voted with Israel this year even when the majority of their party caucus voted otherwise. They're exactly the kind of leaders Israel should know how to work with, even if we don't agree on everything. "

Yair Lapid leader of the opposition in Israel





Jeffries also needs to go. The 2026 election will not be complete with the old leadership of failure. We need new leadership to deliver on our new mandate.


There is no mandate. America voted against liberal policies all over the country. Please push your ultra liberal agenda and see where that gets you in two years. This will be fun to watch
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Raising the Federal minimum wage would be a great way to help the Democrats new, young Southern voters. Trump may veto so start at $12. After a veto pass $11. Then $10 and so on. Let the pressure build.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.