dajo9 said:

---

Yogi Bear said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

Trump should be in a specially built prison with no TVs and no mirrors. Anything else would be too kind.

---

And no Twitter access

---

I'd prefer he live tweet his prison stay

---

I'd prefer not to hear his comments.
But I wouldn't mind being able to check in on a Live Cam feed of him just sitting there, bored, nothing to do in his cell.
I'd like to have all the cohorts there, too.
Graham, Sanders, McConnell, even Paul Ryan for kissing his arse and informing everyone else to do the same.
His come to Jesus moment came too late for me. Quietly stepping aside is no good.

Erect a statue of McCain outside their cell.
GOP who have staunchly spoken out against trump should be hailed as Patriots.

http://online.wsj.com/home-page

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

Trump would have been charged with obstruction were he not president, hundreds of former federal prosecutors assert

https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-would-have-been-charged-with-obstruction-were-he-not-president-hundreds-of-former-federal-prosecutors-assert/2019/05/06/e4946a1a-7006-11e9-9f06-5fc2ee80027a_story.html%3foutputType=amp

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

Sonofoski said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

---

Figure out the quotes

Sonofoski said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

---

Still learning the quote function...okay.

To answer your question: THE FULL UN-REDACTED MUELLER REPORT IS WHAT BILLY BARR IS COVERING UP.

DESPITE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT AN AGREEMENT ON REDCATION, MUELLER SENT BARR A LETTER AFTER BARR RELEASED HIS INFAMOUS LETTER COVERING UP FOR TRUMP. YOU CAN READ IT HERE:

Read: Letter from special counsel Robert Mueller to Attorney General William Barr

DID YOU MISS THIS PART OR JUST FAILED TO RECALL MUELLER WROTE THIS LETTER?

REGARDLESS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE THE FULL UNREDACTED REPORT...BECAUSE WE PAID FOR IT.

Maybe you can ask a foreign country to hack it. I heard that is what a political party does when the opposing party is hiding things.

The republicans should be in favor of release of the undredacted report. Party of law and order and personal responsibility right? I'm sure Trump has done nothing wrong and any additional releases of information will only serve to confirm his innocence. Right?

Unit2Sucks said:

---

The republicans should be in favor of release of the undredacted report. Party of law and order and personal responsibility right? I'm sure Trump has done nothing wrong and any additional releases of information will only serve to confirm his innocence. Right?

---

I mean, I was told that it completely exonerates Trump. Should be a no-brainer for them.

Another Bear said:

---

Sonofoski said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

---

Still learning the quote function...okay.

To answer your question: THE FULL UN-REDACTED MUELLER REPORT IS WHAT BILLY BARR IS COVERING UP.

DESPITE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT AN AGREEMENT ON REDCATION, MUELLER SENT BARR A LETTER AFTER BARR RELEASED HIS INFAMOUS LETTER COVERING UP FOR TRUMP. YOU CAN READ IT HERE:

Read: Letter from special counsel Robert Mueller to Attorney General William Barr

DID YOU MISS THIS PART OR JUST FAILED TO RECALL MUELLER WROTE THIS LETTER?

REGARDLESS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE THE FULL UNREDACTED REPORT...BECAUSE WE PAID FOR IT.

The letter from Mueller was in response to the media interpretation of the 4 page memo; it had nothing to do with the accuracy of what was said by Barr in the memo. Mueller suggested that Barr include some additional summaries which Barr decided was unnecessary due to the fact the report was just days away from being issued.

Just because the American people paid for something doesn't mean by law we are entitled to see it. That is total nonsense.

---

But we all want to truly celebrate the report's complete exoneration of tRump of the collusion delusion and that is only possible by running our fingers through the glorious pages of the tRump affirming document. tRump should want to bask in the glory of Mueller's report as well as Mueller's public testimony about same. EXACTLY HOW F@CKING STUPID DO YOU THINK THE NON FOX NEWS WATCHING UNIVERSE IS?

Quote:

---

The letter from Mueller was in response to the media interpretation of the 4 page memo; it had nothing to do with the accuracy of what was said by Barr in the memo. Mueller suggested that Barr include some additional summaries which Barr decided was unnecessary due to the fact the report was just days away from being issued.

Just because the American people paid for something doesn't mean by law we are entitled to see it. That is total nonsense.

---

Believe what you wish. If that's your read you're a tin foil hat wearing RWNJ.

And apparently, there are quite a few out there.

Ted Lieu, bringing the heat. If there's one thing that will drive conservatives bat sh*t cray are..GOVERNMENT FINES. Yup, SCOTUS approved.

Bring it...and make it hurt.

Cool. Keep bringing it. I am on your side. Lot of crazy and misguided out there.

concordtom said:

---

Which image do you like better?



Or

---

Does this moral arc address adultery?

Mueller's letter never mentions the media

dajo9 said:

---

Mueller's letter never mentions the media

How about public perception. Will that work?

Mueller may not have been concerned but he was getting heat from his left wing lawyers; probably Andrew Weissman, the lead attorney who was at the Hillary victory party.

---

GBear4Life said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Which image do you like better?



Or

---

Does this moral arc address adultery?

---

Does the personal sexual morality of a leader invalidate the social philosophy he advocates? If so, how should we view tRumpism?

Sonofoski said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Mueller's letter never mentions the media

How about public perception. Will that work?

Mueller may not have been concerned but he was getting heat from his left wing lawyers; probably Andrew Weissman, the lead attorney who was at the Hillary victory party.

---

---

You guys just make stuff up as you go, don't you?

dajo9 said:

---

Sonofoski said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Mueller's letter never mentions the media

How about public perception. Will that work?

Mueller may not have been concerned but he was getting heat from his left wing lawyers; probably Andrew Weissman, the lead attorney who was at the Hillary victory party.

---

---

You guys just make stuff up as you go, don't you?

---

Apparently Robert Mueller (a registered Republican appointed by George W. Bush) is now a left-winger. Whatever owns the libs today.

sycasey said:

---

Apparently Robert Mueller (a registered Republican appointed by George W. Bush) is now a left-winger. Whatever owns the libs today.

---

Anyone without unwavering fealty to emperor Trump is an angry democrat and not to be trusted. Only good emperor fearing gentleman like Bill Barr can investigate Trump and of course only to the extent Trump gives the okay in advance. This is how democracy works, didn't you know that?

I'm an angry democrat

bearister said:

---

Does the personal sexual morality of a leader invalidate the social philosophy he advocates? If so, how should we view tRumpism?

---

No, and that's part of my point, which this board frequently demonstrates it doesn't understand. Or at least conflates.

Now let's all say what you said again together as one: The personal immorality of somebody does not invalidate the [...] they advocate.

(But it should disqualify them as public paragons of virtue)

Another Bear said:

---

Sonofoski said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

---

Still learning the quote function...okay.

To answer your question: THE FULL UN-REDACTED MUELLER REPORT IS WHAT BILLY BARR IS COVERING UP.

DESPITE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT AN AGREEMENT ON REDCATION, MUELLER SENT BARR A LETTER AFTER BARR RELEASED HIS INFAMOUS LETTER COVERING UP FOR TRUMP. YOU CAN READ IT HERE:

Read: Letter from special counsel Robert Mueller to Attorney General William Barr

DID YOU MISS THIS PART OR JUST FAILED TO RECALL MUELLER WROTE THIS LETTER?

REGARDLESS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE THE FULL UNREDACTED REPORT...BECAUSE WE PAID FOR IT.

---

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/05/a-letter-to-william-barr.php

kelly09 said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Sonofoski said:

---

Another Bear said:

---

Okay then...House Judiciary Comm will hold a vote on charging William Barr with contempt of Congress. I guess this confirms Billy Barr's cover-up efforts.

"The Attorney General's failure to comply with our subpoena, after extensive accommodation efforts, leaves us no choice but to initiate contempt proceedings in order to enforce the subpoena and access the full, unredacted report," Nadler said.

This whole issue is political grandstanding by idiot Nadler. The whole unredacted report cannot be released to Congress becasue it contains Grand Jury testimony and it's release is againist the law.

And just what is Barr covering up? You do know that both the Special Counsel and the AG lawyers went over the entire report and, collectively, agreed on the redactions.

---

---

Still learning the quote function...okay.

To answer your question: THE FULL UN-REDACTED MUELLER REPORT IS WHAT BILLY BARR IS COVERING UP.

DESPITE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT AN AGREEMENT ON REDCATION, MUELLER SENT BARR A LETTER AFTER BARR RELEASED HIS INFAMOUS LETTER COVERING UP FOR TRUMP. YOU CAN READ IT HERE:

Read: Letter from special counsel Robert Mueller to Attorney General William Barr

DID YOU MISS THIS PART OR JUST FAILED TO RECALL MUELLER WROTE THIS LETTER?

REGARDLESS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO SEE THE FULL UNREDACTED REPORT...BECAUSE WE PAID FOR IT.

---

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/05/a-letter-to-william-barr.php

---

Powerlineblog. That's where I go to get my important news and analysis.

Yogi Bear said:

---

kelly09 said:

---

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/05/a-letter-to-william-barr.php

---

Powerlineblog. That's where I go to get my important news and analysis.

---

Lot of fallacies from you today. This one the 'appeal to authority' fallacy. If it's not source I recognize as credible or an ideological ally, I can dismiss the content out-of-hand. If the Daily Caller claims the water is wet, then its fake news. CNN reports water is hydrogen plus oxygen, it's fake news.

Flood's letter is meaningless. Under his interpretation, Mueller's report may as well been a one sentence memo saying the following: "Because Mr. Trump is the sitting President of the United States of America, the current DOJ policy as set forth by the Office of Legal Counsel prohibits his prosecution."

There is no other way to reconcile the statements by Trump and his defenders. The fact that the current DOJ policy says that you can't indict a sitting POTUS does not mean that a POTUS is above the law. Trump, Giuliani, Flood and all of the partisan defenders of Trump have made the argument that Trump cannot be prosecuted by the DOJ regardless of wrongdoing, but that doesn't mean that he didn't do anything wrong.

dajo9 said:

---

Sonofoski said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Mueller's letter never mentions the media

How about public perception. Will that work?

Mueller may not have been concerned but he was getting heat from his left wing lawyers; probably Andrew Weissman, the lead attorney who was at the Hillary victory party.

---

---

You guys just make stuff up as you go, don't you?

Andrew Weissman was the lead attorney. His proscution of Arthur Andersen in the Enron case resulted in the demise of AA. However, what he did with those initially convicted at Merrill Lynch was overturned by the Supreme Court in a 9-0 verdict.

Weissman was an avid supporter of Hillary Clinton and was on the stage when she gave her concession speech the day after the November 8 election.

You do a lot of opinion comments. Defenition of an opinion: A view or judgement formed about something, not necessary based on fact or knowledge.

Definition of a fact: A fact relies on observation or research. The fact is an obective reality wheras opinion is a subjective statement.

Keep posting your opinions. They are fun to read as you have no facts.

---

Quick lesson for old Republicans on BI on how to use the quote feature.

1. Click on the quote button.


2. Write in the white part of the screen, not the gray part.

Can the Green Party use your advise too, BA?

oski003 said:

---

Can the Green Party use your advise too, BA?

---

They don't need it - they're smart enough to do it on their own. Only moron, in-bred, science and technology adverse RWNJs seem to need the help.