I was wrong...violence is indeed occuring

5,957 Views | 48 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by BearForce2
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1 said:

Big C said:

hanky1 said:

BearChemist said:

Didn't janky predict there will be butthurts after the election? He is actually right this time, unlike numerous other times.




I'm just admitting i was wrong: I thought there would only be violence by liberals if they lost. It turns out they won and are still trying to kill people.

So, you're admitting we won?
Yes Biden won. Trump is misguided in his challenge, but it's not illegal.

This violence perpetrated by liberals is illegal.
Leading the nation to the edge of civil war is also criminal.
A case could be made.
Trump will be in jail for other crimes.
And he will never had a statue in DC.
Because it will be torn down if every erected.
I'm going to wipe my feces on his grave after he dies.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

..knockout victims in waiting.
lol.
Hell, I ain't going to be found in the streets. I'd be a knockout victim in waiting, too.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hanky1 said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.




If you honestly believe that all the liberal violence that happens is because of 'plants' then ive for a pizza parlor filled with Democrats who eat babies you should check out.
Liberals tend to be less violent. It is part of their value system going back to the practices of Martin Luther King and the civil rights movement. Those were liberal movements.
I don't recall any major conservative leaders being assassinated in the US by a liberal.

You'll have to bring some evidence that liberals are violent. I don't particularly find that to be the case.
According to the republican run office of homeland security, the largest threats of violence and terrorism come right out of extreme right wing militant groups. I am not familiar with extreme left wing militant groups currently. Maybe there are some in other countries.

And don't feed me your antifa BS. Give me a break. That is another Trump conspiracy theory. Antifa have largely been involved in violent situations because they are standing up again fascism, which is on the rise and is becoming blatantly violent, including violent against antifa. If I'm antifa, I am damn well going to defend myself. That is not violence. That is self preservation.

Anyway, focusing on "liberal" violence in this country is like arguing over a parking ticket while someone is burning down your house. You sure can cherry pick your issues as long as it keeps your politics intact.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
Kaworu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear said:

Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
That's not true. MSNBC does hateful biased reporting on progressives.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kaworu said:

heartofthebear said:

Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
That's not true. MSNBC does hateful biased reporting on progressives.
I don't see MSNBC practicing hate. They are plenty biased and they do misrepresent Trump. Okay, they hate Trump. I don't think that counts. He deserves it. Fox hates all kinds of folks outside their tiny little box they call reality. MSNBC doesn't entirely base their reporting on hate bating. They actually produce programs that inform on the issues and they focus on news not hate. Fox is a hate organization broadcasting hate through news. MSNBC is a news organization that, in the process of reporting, will make someone look bad because they deserve it. That's a big difference.

But, aside from that, you don't know who is doing the violence so stop pretending that you do.
Kaworu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear said:

Kaworu said:

heartofthebear said:

Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
That's not true. MSNBC does hateful biased reporting on progressives.
I don't see MSNBC practicing hate. They are plenty biased and they do misrepresent Trump. Okay, they hate Trump. I don't think that counts. He deserves it. Fox hates all kinds of folks outside their tiny little box they call reality. MSNBC doesn't entirely base their reporting on hate bating. They actually produce programs that inform on the issues and they focus on news not hate. Fox is a hate organization broadcasting hate through news. MSNBC is a news organization that, in the process of reporting, will make someone look bad because they deserve it. That's a big difference.

But, aside from that, you don't know who is doing the violence so stop pretending that you do.
I guess you weren't watching them during February.

And I think you've confused me with Bear With Me above, as that was his point.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kaworu said:

heartofthebear said:

Kaworu said:

heartofthebear said:

Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
That's not true. MSNBC does hateful biased reporting on progressives.
I don't see MSNBC practicing hate. They are plenty biased and they do misrepresent Trump. Okay, they hate Trump. I don't think that counts. He deserves it. Fox hates all kinds of folks outside their tiny little box they call reality. MSNBC doesn't entirely base their reporting on hate bating. They actually produce programs that inform on the issues and they focus on news not hate. Fox is a hate organization broadcasting hate through news. MSNBC is a news organization that, in the process of reporting, will make someone look bad because they deserve it. That's a big difference.

But, aside from that, you don't know who is doing the violence so stop pretending that you do.
I guess you weren't watching them during February.

And I think you've confused me with Bear With Me above, as that was his point.
My apologies, I did get confused.
I was watching MSNBC in February. I watched them help the DNC take down Bernie with slanted reporting. Mathews was forced into retirement for his blatant slamming of Bernie.
So it cracks me up when folks think MSNBC is liberal. It's centrist. But far right people see everything as liberal because most things are left of where they stand. And most things are left of where Fox stands.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Daytime MSNBC is establishment Republican. The personalities are all people who left the Republican Party because of Trump. There are also some non-personality straight news types. Primetime MSNBC is Democratic but not Bernie-like. Maybe Chris Hayes is the exception so they don't let him in on the election night roundtables. There was a night when Bernie dominated the primaries and MSNBC was the absolute worst in their obvious disappointment. I wasn't supporting Bernie and even I found it offensive.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear said:

Bear With Me said:

heartofthebear said:

LOL
It has been a long and effective strategy to discredit various social movements by planting violent people amidst their protests and demonstrations.

Investigations have proven that police, the FBI and other "national security" organizations regularly pose as members of certain groups.

Infiltration of primarily anti violence groups like anti-war groups in order to disrupt their effectiveness goes back to the 60s with covert programs like COINTELPRO.

Anybody that takes what happens at these rallies and protests as evidence of violence on the part of any group is probably also inclined to believe what they hear on Fox News as well.


LOL

Implying in the same post that police and FBI plants are responsible for the violence and that Fox News has a monopoly on bias reporting.
Fox has a monopoly on hatefully biased reporting.
Fox isn't the only hatefully biased news outlet. See Newsmax, OAN, Breitbart, etc.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Mathews was forced into retirement for his blatant slamming of Bernie."

Nope....and BTW, Matthews bashed Hillary every day in the run up to 2016 Election.

Chris Matthews admits to sexual-harassment incident on his show


https://www.irishcentral.com/news/chris-matthews-sexual-harassment



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe hankyPhD forgot to tell Laura Ingraham where violence is going to come from.

Laura Ingraham shares 'hard truth' with Biden: Insulting Trump supporters will 'only incite more violence'

Quote:

The time for talk about dignity, unity and respect is over and 'the time for action is here,' Fox News host says



dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"Mathews was forced into retirement for his blatant slamming of Bernie."

Nope....and BTW, Matthews bashed Hillary every day in the run up to 2016 Election.

Chris Matthews admits to sexual-harassment incident on his show


https://www.irishcentral.com/news/chris-matthews-sexual-harassment




Back during the Bill Clinton impeachment Matthews was on air every day with future Fox News contributor, Pat Caddell, talking about how awful Bill Clinton was. Chris Matthews was a habitual democratic saboteur.
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"Mathews was forced into retirement for his blatant slamming of Bernie."

Nope....and BTW, Matthews bashed Hillary every day in the run up to 2016 Election.

Chris Matthews admits to sexual-harassment incident on his show


https://www.irishcentral.com/news/chris-matthews-sexual-harassment




Thanks for the correction.
Anyway, I was watching MSNBC and I did not think they were fair to Bernie, but, other than Chris Mathews, they did not spew hate towards Bernie. And, in general, despite their clear biases, they are restrained regarding their personal opinions towards folks they disagree with. This is not the case on Fox.

Yes, MSNBC started slamming Trump, but that was because Trump deserved it and because Trump has been spewing outright lies and misinformation about the media in general and MSNBC specifically. Actually I found it quite refreshing, not because I hate Trump myself, but because I get a kick out of it when someone stands up to a bully like Trump.
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The propaganda media machine absolutely does not care. Just a typical weekend in a blue city.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.