Cal Alumna Alex Morgan Sounds Off On State Of American Soccer

The United States women's national soccer team legend recently criticized the Stars and Stripes’ footy issues rooted at the youth level.
July 9, 2026
2.7k Views
9 Comments
Story Poster
Photo by Jamie Smed is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

The true Captain America has spoken.

Alex Morgan, iconic Cal alumna and United States women's national soccer team legend, recently chimed in on the state of The Beautiful Game in America, criticizing the Stars and Stripes’ footy issues rooted at the youth level.

Morgan’s comments — made on the New Heights podcast, hosted by Jason and Travis Kelce, alongside fellow USWNT great Kelley O’Hara — weigh even heavier and truer after the hosting U.S.’s men’s national team flamed out of the 2026 World Cup in a deflating 4-1 Round-of-16 loss to Belgium on Monday in Seattle.

“We don’t want to kick Paraguay’s ass,” Morgan said, referencing the USMNT’s 4-1 World Cup-opening win. “We want to kick Spain and France and Germany. I think it’s all about the youth system, because soccer is a sport that you really do start training as a young kid. And I think it’s been, in a lot of ways, made as a business. 

“And I really want the youth system — that is really fractured right now — to be repaired and really harness kids growing up and giving them opportunities — more opportunities than exist right now.”

Morgan’s point is currently at the forefront of discourse surrounding American soccer.

Many, including classic USMNT alumni such as Landon Donovan, are joining Morgan in arguing that American soccer is too expensive at the youth level, and, as a result, sign-ups and registrations often take precedence over development and opportunities for all.

Of course, there are several other reasons why the U.S.’s men’s national team is always steps behind the rest of the world; for one, football, baseball and basketball purely dominate.

But there’s no denying Morgan’s point that American soccer is pricey and oftentimes inaccessible. After all, she would know.

Morgan had a 30-plus-year career in American soccer, competing from the youth level in question to Diamond Bar High School to Berkeley — where she met her husband and fellow Cal soccer star Servando Carrasco, and as a senior, was called up to the USWNT’s 2011 World Cup squad as the youngest player on the roster — to the game’s biggest stages before ultimately retiring at 35 with a Costco receipt’s worth of accolades.

She has been outspoken about the issues with youth soccer for years now, too.

“Unfortunately, the pay-to-play model, I believe, is getting worse in soccer than when I played competitive soccer (growing up),” Morgan said in 2019 as a panelist at a DICK’S Sporting Goods event.

“It’s a very inexpensive sport, and the fact that we’ve made youth soccer in the U.S. more of a business than a grassroots sport is, I think, detrimental to the growth of the sport in the U.S.”

Morgan has given much of her life to soccer.

And like a true Berkeley political economy graduate, Morgan continues to be a diplomat of the sport — and athletics in general — through several organizations, including her own.

The Golden Bear simply wants to see the youth soccer landscape change for the better.

9 Comments
Discussion from...

Cal Alumna Alex Morgan Sounds Off On State Of American Soccer

2,568 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 26 days ago by kc1121
BearinOC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How bad can the "Pay to Play" model be for soccer, really? I mean, is it worse than volleyball and softball?

Kids in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and the like are not paying any money. It is just a cost of a ball and cleats. It's not $500 bat every time a new model comes out, $300 gloves, monthly $250 dues, "Stay to Play hotel costs" etc. And dont get me started on club volleyball costs.

blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it's really bad. Having a daughter who played at the highest level of ECNL club soccer and then in college, I saw it all first hand. Parents are far too involved and catered to over skill development and tactics. Everyone is playing for a college scholarship. Costs were easily over 20K a year. Travel was 2 hours each way to practice 6 days a week and matches were throughout New England and the South every weekend with tournaments in Texas and California. Playing for your high school team was highly discouraged if not out and out banned. Teams played to win at ridiculously young age rather than to learn spacing and ball control.

Is softball and volleyball similar. Sure. But I would argue that along with lacrosse they don't reach quite the same heights of financial investment and total dominance by the tiered club system over local club teams and school teams. Ironically some of the best US players do not come from the system, but rather from kids who were not exceptional players at a young age and never specialized in soccer and remained multi-sport athletes who matured separate from the system.

Another huge difference between volleyball and softball is that our national teams are not competing against the world's number one sport where countries by contrast are not pay to play and whose nations prioritize soccer over all other sports. Volleyball and softball enjoy popularity in other countries, but soccer is the number one sport in the vast majority of other countries. A pay to play system in the US in volleyball and softball may in fact improve our competitive advantage in those sports whereas in soccer it produces an elitism that is not good for the mental composition of the players and teams. We have the athletes, coaches, and talent--but we do not have the deep mentality of winners and tactical wherewithal to currently reach the top tier on the world stage. I had thought we were further along in our development but Belgium exposed us and the need to revamp the youth system.

It is going to be very hard to kill off the money-making club system though and the ego boost that parents get bragging about how their child plays for an ECNL club (the tier where over 90% of players get college scholarships). College coaches go to ECNL tournaments and draft their college rosters. If you are not on that track it is very hard to get noticed or play in college. So effectively, kids are auditioning for college and getting their college scholarships in junior high where they try and make the cut to ECNL or other National or Elite tracks before they are even fully developed physically or mentally. I have seen players completely dominate the best players in ECNL at 15--17. Players you would swear will be on the US National team by their incredible athleticism and unbelievable skills who get full rides to the top D1 colleges...who then have decent but unspectacular college careers and never get a whiff at the national team. We place too much pressure and emphasis on kid's abilities before they've blossomed physically and force them to specialize too soon, and this is all because they want to make the ECNL teams and be on the college scholarship track.
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great topic. I will add one other facet (based on experience in Lamorinda area years ago), I have no idea if it is still a major factor today or in other areas. FREE PLAY!

There are alot (but still a limited number) of gyms and fields for basketball, soccer, volleyball, lacrosse, etc. Although they may appear public. Most of them are NOT and go through a convoluted process to share and sell gym/field time and balance with maintenance and recovery time. So the concept of grass roots or pick up games is much less likely or even possible these days.

Yes - both basketball and soccer are examples of sports that can use almost any area (set up shirts or cones for goals) or use a beat up public hoop (don't worry about net or perfect height). But then kids run into the societal issue of free play. In Moraga in the 90s/00s I would get calls from the local Karen patrol if my kid and their friend were seen 'wilding' outside of an organized sport. Free play does not seem to be allowed by kids - there must be adult supervision - which can be limiting during summer day time, when some parent may have a job.

I'm past the child rearing stage - but one of my greatest frustrations was that the era of "just be home for dinner/when the streetlights go on/before dark" seems to have been lost forever. Most of my social skills (as well as dribbling skills) were learned on the streets making friends with strangers and making up games to avoid boredom, No adults necessary. By the time I got to middle/high school, I didn't need to practice or drill how to dribble, pass or turn a double-play - it was muscle memory,

My daughters went through a system like blungld describes. They both have far superior skills than I ever dreamed of. But as adults, they don't seem to have the same passion as I do.
calbear91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Both my sons played youth soccer. Both are good athletes. Both were top athletes on their track and XC teams. Both love soccer. Neither stayed with soccer because the guys on their teams were *******s. The culture was rotten. Pompous bullies. My boys aren't lightweight. They simply didn't like the politics and bull***** They were both captains of their track teams. The American soccer system is broken in various ways, not only financially. It's also a cultural problem. And no one talks about the biggest issue, which is that the young men, in particular men, with the most talent do not play soccer.

If you took the average NFL cornerback and wide receiver, they would be better athletes than the typical men on the American national soccer team, or guys playing MLS. If you took the average point guard in the NBA, they are better athletes than the majority of guys playing US soccer. The top athletes in Europe and Africa and South American play soccer. Our guys don't. Until that changes, we will be mediocre.

Put an American lineup out there of NBA point guard and NFL wide receiver level talent, and with lifelong skill development as youth, and the US will be a dominant force in international soccer. Not until then.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear91 said:

Both my sons played youth soccer. Both are good athletes. Both were top athletes on their track and XC teams. Both love soccer. Neither stayed with soccer because the guys on their teams were *******s. The culture was rotten. Pompous bullies. My boys aren't lightweight. They simply didn't like the politics and bull***** They were both captains of their track teams. The American soccer system is broken in various ways, not only financially. It's also a cultural problem. And no one talks about the biggest issue, which is that the young men, in particular men, with the most talent do not play soccer.

If you took the average NFL cornerback and wide receiver, they would be better athletes than the typical men on the American national soccer team, or guys playing MLS. If you took the average point guard in the NBA, they are better athletes than the majority of guys playing US soccer. The top athletes in Europe and Africa and South American play soccer. Our guys don't. Until that changes, we will be mediocre.

Put an American lineup out there of NBA point guard and NFL wide receiver level talent, and with lifelong skill development as youth, and the US will be a dominant force in international soccer. Not until then.



While there is a lot of truth to what you wrote, ESPN just did a pretty good article addressing the "our best athletes don't play soccer trope." I have to agree with the article's thesis that we do not suffer for athleticism on our national teams. The top football player or basketball player is not suited for soccer. It's a completely different skillset snd physique. It's not cut and paste and with the size of our country our talent pool is more than adequate. With the exception of perhaps 2 or 3 teams I don't think the US is out athleted. We have bridged and surpassed most countries in terms of athleticism. Having NFL or NBA players in soccer would do nothing to improve that profile. It's all about skill development, tactics, and mentality.
calbear91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

calbear91 said:

Both my sons played youth soccer. Both are good athletes. Both were top athletes on their track and XC teams. Both love soccer. Neither stayed with soccer because the guys on their teams were *******s. The culture was rotten. Pompous bullies. My boys aren't lightweight. They simply didn't like the politics and bull***** They were both captains of their track teams. The American soccer system is broken in various ways, not only financially. It's also a cultural problem. And no one talks about the biggest issue, which is that the young men, in particular men, with the most talent do not play soccer.

If you took the average NFL cornerback and wide receiver, they would be better athletes than the typical men on the American national soccer team, or guys playing MLS. If you took the average point guard in the NBA, they are better athletes than the majority of guys playing US soccer. The top athletes in Europe and Africa and South American play soccer. Our guys don't. Until that changes, we will be mediocre.

Put an American lineup out there of NBA point guard and NFL wide receiver level talent, and with lifelong skill development as youth, and the US will be a dominant force in international soccer. Not until then.



While there is a lot of truth to what you wrote, ESPN just did a pretty good article addressing the "our best athletes don't play soccer trope." I have to agree with the article's thesis that we do not suffer for athleticism on our national teams. The top football player or basketball player is not suited for soccer. It's a completely different skillset snd physique. It's not cut and paste and with the size of our country our talent pool is more than adequate. With the exception of perhaps 2 or 3 teams I don't think the US is out athleted. We have bridged and surpassed most countries in terms of athleticism. Having NFL or NBA players in soccer would do nothing to improve that profile. It's all about skill development, tactics, and mentality.

Fair point and I didn't make it myself only to avoid writing a novel. True enough the skills and abilities do not overlap entirely, but my main point stands that the top athletes in the US do not play soccer. Period. I live near Seattle, and I can promise you that the top athletes do not play soccer. So in addition to skill development and all the other legitimate factors that limit our success, we will never be dominant without a psyche change among American youth that soccer is both glamorous enough, and pays well enough, to warrant youth excitement like the NFL or NBA, or even lowly baseball, for that matter. Not all, but some, of that top talent would make excellent soccer players. NO way Haaland is the only tall, good athlete! Imagine if Jason Kidd played soccer instead???????Not saying he would automatically succeed, but if kids with his talent played soccer, can you imagine the talent on our team?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear91 said:

blungld said:

calbear91 said:

Both my sons played youth soccer. Both are good athletes. Both were top athletes on their track and XC teams. Both love soccer. Neither stayed with soccer because the guys on their teams were *******s. The culture was rotten. Pompous bullies. My boys aren't lightweight. They simply didn't like the politics and bull***** They were both captains of their track teams. The American soccer system is broken in various ways, not only financially. It's also a cultural problem. And no one talks about the biggest issue, which is that the young men, in particular men, with the most talent do not play soccer.

If you took the average NFL cornerback and wide receiver, they would be better athletes than the typical men on the American national soccer team, or guys playing MLS. If you took the average point guard in the NBA, they are better athletes than the majority of guys playing US soccer. The top athletes in Europe and Africa and South American play soccer. Our guys don't. Until that changes, we will be mediocre.

Put an American lineup out there of NBA point guard and NFL wide receiver level talent, and with lifelong skill development as youth, and the US will be a dominant force in international soccer. Not until then.



While there is a lot of truth to what you wrote, ESPN just did a pretty good article addressing the "our best athletes don't play soccer trope." I have to agree with the article's thesis that we do not suffer for athleticism on our national teams. The top football player or basketball player is not suited for soccer. It's a completely different skillset snd physique. It's not cut and paste and with the size of our country our talent pool is more than adequate. With the exception of perhaps 2 or 3 teams I don't think the US is out athleted. We have bridged and surpassed most countries in terms of athleticism. Having NFL or NBA players in soccer would do nothing to improve that profile. It's all about skill development, tactics, and mentality.

Fair point and I didn't make it myself only to avoid writing a novel. True enough the skills and abilities do not overlap entirely, but my main point stands that the top athletes in the US do not play soccer. Period. I live near Seattle, and I can promise you that the top athletes do not play soccer. So in addition to skill development and all the other legitimate factors that limit our success, we will never be dominant without a psyche change among American youth that soccer is both glamorous enough, and pays well enough, to warrant youth excitement like the NFL or NBA, or even lowly baseball, for that matter. Not all, but some, of that top talent would make excellent soccer players. NO way Haaland is the only tall, good athlete! Imagine if Jason Kidd played soccer instead???????Not saying he would automatically succeed, but if kids with his talent played soccer, can you imagine the talent on our team?


Blungld is right, pure athleticism is overvalued, look at Messi, 5'7", 148lbs. Haaland doesn't fit the mold, his build works for him as a poacher but it's not like there aren't tons of big dudes in northern Europe and none have panned out before him. One of the greatest Scandinavian forwards is Denmark's Allan Simonsen, 5'5" 128lbs, European Player of the Year and Ballon d'Or in 1977 with W. German champions Borussia Moenchengladbach.

To this day, Simonsen is the only Scandinavian player to have ever won these awards. He had a better touch on the ball and better dribbling skills than Haaland.





Simonsen beat out a list of all-time greats including Johan Cruyff, Michel Platini, Kevin Keegan. Note that these players also were not particularly physically gifted athletes, but they were monsters and geniuses with the ball.

It's mostly about soccer culture, and Donovan, Morgan et al are right that with this regard, the US youth pipeline is broken.

On a related subject, the notable decline in Brazilian futebol in the last decade plus has been attributed to the decline in the national soccer culture there, with a change in environment in the favelas and their top players being poached by European clubs as teens and becoming Europeanized, not developing in the traditional Brazilian jogo bonito culture. Brazil has dominated international soccer throughout the modern era until the 2010s, but lately have been a mid to bottom top 10 team.
HairOfTheBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

calbear91 said:

Both my sons played youth soccer. Both are good athletes. Both were top athletes on their track and XC teams. Both love soccer. Neither stayed with soccer because the guys on their teams were *******s. The culture was rotten. Pompous bullies. My boys aren't lightweight. They simply didn't like the politics and bull***** They were both captains of their track teams. The American soccer system is broken in various ways, not only financially. It's also a cultural problem. And no one talks about the biggest issue, which is that the young men, in particular men, with the most talent do not play soccer.

If you took the average NFL cornerback and wide receiver, they would be better athletes than the typical men on the American national soccer team, or guys playing MLS. If you took the average point guard in the NBA, they are better athletes than the majority of guys playing US soccer. The top athletes in Europe and Africa and South American play soccer. Our guys don't. Until that changes, we will be mediocre.

Put an American lineup out there of NBA point guard and NFL wide receiver level talent, and with lifelong skill development as youth, and the US will be a dominant force in international soccer. Not until then.



While there is a lot of truth to what you wrote, ESPN just did a pretty good article addressing the "our best athletes don't play soccer trope." I have to agree with the article's thesis that we do not suffer for athleticism on our national teams. The top football player or basketball player is not suited for soccer. It's a completely different skillset snd physique. It's not cut and paste and with the size of our country our talent pool is more than adequate. With the exception of perhaps 2 or 3 teams I don't think the US is out athleted. We have bridged and surpassed most countries in terms of athleticism. Having NFL or NBA players in soccer would do nothing to improve that profile. It's all about skill development, tactics, and mentality.



I have really noticed the speed of some of the players and how they change the game and I can't help but imagine a world where Jahvid Best and Desean Jackson grew up in a very soccer rich environ. Coach Tedford said last week that the 2 fastest players he saw on the football field were Jah and Desean. Thinking of them with deeply developed soccer minds and some amazing footwork, they would be tough. Also, they are not too tall, both stand approx. 5'10". Jeez, the acceleration they would have off a one on one juke move and then turning the corner or chasing down a long lead pass down field.

Anyway, fun for my little brain to think about lol
kc1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49353204/the-usmnt-struggles-world-cup-fixed-overhauling-youth-development
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.