Absolutely no chance of that happening with this team and this horrible coaching staff.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
It hasn't happened in 70 years. Think about that. We have not swept the California teams in 70 frickin years. So, safe bet it won't happen this year, and I guess i would rather it happen when it means something.Strykur said:
Would it turn off the hot seat for a while? Sure.
Is it gonna happen? Not sure after tonight.
TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Actually, 63 years. The last time was 1958, the Rose Bowl season.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Big C said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Hell yes! Look, folks, I'm as pissed off as anybody, but wins are wins are wins and I'd love to get some more this year, especially the Big Game.
Take tonight: It became obvious after Wash. St that we weren't going anywhere this season, but tonight in the second half, I found myself REALLY wanting this win. Wins are good.
Record since last year is 2-8. We're close to last year Tedford bad, and almost 2013/2001 bad.KoreAmBear said:Also losses are bad. 1-5 should get one fired.Big C said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Hell yes! Look, folks, I'm as pissed off as anybody, but wins are wins are wins and I'd love to get some more this year, especially the Big Game.
Take tonight: It became obvious after Wash. St that we weren't going anywhere this season, but tonight in the second half, I found myself REALLY wanting this win. Wins are good.
Cal Strong don't see us winning more than 2 games this year. That far worse than it was under Tedford, even in his last year.Strykur said:Record since last year is 2-8. We're close to last year Tedford bad, and almost 2013/2001 bad.KoreAmBear said:Also losses are bad. 1-5 should get one fired.Big C said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Hell yes! Look, folks, I'm as pissed off as anybody, but wins are wins are wins and I'd love to get some more this year, especially the Big Game.
Take tonight: It became obvious after Wash. St that we weren't going anywhere this season, but tonight in the second half, I found myself REALLY wanting this win. Wins are good.
SBGold said:
Just win the Big Game, that's all I ask now
I think UCLA is going to be the problem unless they run into injury problems. I am encouraged by what I saw last night, particularly the ability to drive the length of the field late and the fact that Garbers had some zip on his throws. His accuracy seems to have improved. It would help, however, if Garbers would throw an accurate screen pass and hit open guys downfield.calumnus said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Arizona and Colorado. Finish 6-6 with the Axe and then at long last we get a Chezit Bowl trophy! 7-6! Winning conference record too.
Wow...I must have missed that one somehow...70 years without beating those three in the same season. Throw that in with 71 years without starting a season with six wins in a row...63 years no Rose Bowl and 84 without a win in the same...and Cal is just a benchmark hall of fame.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Only 63 years...that'll make that stat look much better now that 70.71Bear said:Actually, 63 years. The last time was 1958, the Rose Bowl season.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
KoreAmBear said:Big C said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Hell yes! Look, folks, I'm as pissed off as anybody, but wins are wins are wins and I'd love to get some more this year, especially the Big Game.
Take tonight: It became obvious after Wash. St that we weren't going anywhere this season, but tonight in the second half, I found myself REALLY wanting this win. Wins are good.
Also losses are bad. 1-5 should get one fired.
TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
If we beat CU, OSU and UA, we will beat SC. Then Furd would be a toss-up and UCLA a mild upset (if those new rb's of theirs are still on their feet, we won't).TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
That's the weird thing: Oregon was the toughest opponent on the schedule, and we came a few yards short of an upset. There's nobody remaining that we can't beat...theoretically.eabandit said:
guys we can still turn this into an 8-5 season, am I right or am I right?
Queue the inspirational speech:Golden One said:Absolutely no chance of that happening with this team and this horrible coaching staff.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Pass that bong, bro! You HIGH as a kite!TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
TandemBear said:Pass that bong, bro! You HIGH as a kite!TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Edit: Then again, this IS Cal. So they'd obviously pick a total throw-away season to do this. When it means absolutely NOTHING, Cal would pull it off. TypiCal.
JSC 76 said:That's the weird thing: Oregon was the toughest opponent on the schedule, and we came a few yards short of an upset. There's nobody remaining that we can't beat...theoretically.eabandit said:
guys we can still turn this into an 8-5 season, am I right or am I right?
Check back in 2028 :-)pasadenaorbust said:Only 63 years...that'll make that stat look much better now that 70.71Bear said:Actually, 63 years. The last time was 1958, the Rose Bowl season.TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
calumnus said:TheFiatLux said:
USC, UC Los Angeles and Stanfurd. At least get that in-state sweep for the first time in 70 years?
Throw the Arizona game in front of those three and finishing out w 4 wins including that California sweep would at least feel good going into next year.
Arizona and Colorado. Finish 6-6 with the Axe and then at long last we get a Chezit Bowl trophy! 7-6! Winning conference record too.
Heck we're 7-7, Cal's beaten Cal ever weak for as far back as I can remember.JSC 76 said:That's the weird thing: Oregon was the toughest opponent on the schedule, and we came a few yards short of an upset. There's nobody remaining that we can't beat...theoretically.eabandit said:
guys we can still turn this into an 8-5 season, am I right or am I right?
