If Oregon's football program is a dumpster fire, what does that make Berkeley's program?
Yes. If Knowlton was hiring a new head football coach for Cal today, it might be someone like Matt Wells, who did fairly well at Utah State several years back, before being fired by Texas Tech a few months ago. That would be a very Fox-y hire for Knowlton to make.71Bear said:SHOULD take, when the time comes….dimitrig said:Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Well, not just a DC who has never been a P5 head coach, but a guy who hasn't been a head coach ANYWHERE and just got the DC job in 2019.
This is the type of gamble Cal might (should?) take.
Of course, it won't happen because the guy doing the hiring has a phobia about creative thinking. He would be more comfortable with someone from Retread Tech…..
I was thinking someone like Charlie Weis but, yeah, Wells sounds about right, too.BearSD said:Yes. If Knowlton was hiring a new head football coach for Cal today, it might be someone like Matt Wells, who did fairly well at Utah State several years back, before being fired by Texas Tech a few months ago. That would be a very Fox-y hire for Knowlton to make.71Bear said:SHOULD take, when the time comes….dimitrig said:Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Well, not just a DC who has never been a P5 head coach, but a guy who hasn't been a head coach ANYWHERE and just got the DC job in 2019.
This is the type of gamble Cal might (should?) take.
Of course, it won't happen because the guy doing the hiring has a phobia about creative thinking. He would be more comfortable with someone from Retread Tech…..
But the delusional "fire Wilcox today" crowd must think Knowlton would hire the next Nick Saban.
Wasn't Chip Kelly a offense coordinator at power house New Hampshire before being hired by Oregon. I think so.. Kelly sure damaged their reputation at that time but it was repaired fairly quickly.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
The stuff that is burning in the dumpster?Salty said:
If Oregon's football program is a dumpster fire, what does that make Berkeley's program?
GOLDEN said:Wasn't Chip Kelly a offense coordinator at power house New Hampshire before being hired by Oregon. I think so.. Kelly sure damaged their reputation at that time but it was repaired fairly quickly.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Besides everone know Oregon has 85 million to play with. This new coach is not getting all of that so they can afford to go shopping for a high octane offensive coordinator.
Like when Oklahoma hired Florida's DC?BearSD said:Exactly, Going outside your program to hire a coordinator who has never been a head coach is what you do if you are Cal or Oregon State. It's not what you do if you are the conference's alleged king of the hill.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Clemson's. But the point remains the same.ducktilldeath said:Like when Oklahoma hired Florida's DC?BearSD said:Exactly, Going outside your program to hire a coordinator who has never been a head coach is what you do if you are Cal or Oregon State. It's not what you do if you are the conference's alleged king of the hill.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Who said he wouldn't be the guy? The guy who broke the story has a solid reputation. There was little doubt it would play out in the manner it did.calbear80 said:
I am tempted to say I told you so, although, I should not.
Go Bears!
calbear80 said:
I am tempted to say I told you so, although, I should not.
Go Bears!
thanks for the new word, had to duckduckgo it..GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
Nice use of a paralipsis!
Wait, you are a real Oregon fan? Have you been combing through the fan sites for every other school in college football looking for comments about Oregon's new football coach?ducktilldeath said:Like when Oklahoma hired Florida's DC?BearSD said:Exactly, Going outside your program to hire a coordinator who has never been a head coach is what you do if you are Cal or Oregon State. It's not what you do if you are the conference's alleged king of the hill.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
This would be the wrong time and place for me to criticize other schools' fan sites for providing no user edification beyond sports knowledge and opinions.
GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
This would be the wrong time and place for me to criticize other schools' fan sites for providing no user edification beyond sports knowledge and opinions.
I agree with you and I am also not going to bring up the shortcomings of other schools' fan sites. The inability of the fans on those sites to provide intellectually stimulating content beyond opinions related to football is not a topic that I think is worth mentioning.
GoldenBearofCalifornia said:calbear80 said:
I am tempted to say I told you so, although, I should not.
Go Bears!
Nice use of a paralipsis!
I meant Bob Stoops.71Bear said:Clemson's. But the point remains the same.ducktilldeath said:Like when Oklahoma hired Florida's DC?BearSD said:Exactly, Going outside your program to hire a coordinator who has never been a head coach is what you do if you are Cal or Oregon State. It's not what you do if you are the conference's alleged king of the hill.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Before everything went paywall fans of teams used to interact. I've "known" people on this board for almost 20 years. Sorry if that doesn't meet with your approval. More likely you just don't like getting called out for saying something stupid.BearSD said:Wait, you are a real Oregon fan? Have you been combing through the fan sites for every other school in college football looking for comments about Oregon's new football coach?ducktilldeath said:Like when Oklahoma hired Florida's DC?BearSD said:Exactly, Going outside your program to hire a coordinator who has never been a head coach is what you do if you are Cal or Oregon State. It's not what you do if you are the conference's alleged king of the hill.Golden One said:Seems hard to believe that Oregon wouldn't reach higher than a DC who has never been a P5 head coach. It would be a real blow to their reputation as the premier program of the Pac-12 if the report is true.dimitrig said:
Could be a good thing for Cal.
1. He is a DC. Why would a team known for high powered offense want a DC as head coach?
2. He is really inexperienced.
3. Even though he did coach at ASU he really has no West Coast ties.
4. He is known as one of the best recruiters in the country, but I am not sure recruiting is Oregon's biggest problem.
I think he fizzles. Seems like a real reach for a school like Oregon.
Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
This would be the wrong time and place for me to criticize other schools' fan sites for providing no user edification beyond sports knowledge and opinions.
I agree with you and I am also not going to bring up the shortcomings of other schools' fan sites. The inability of the fans on those sites to provide intellectually stimulating content beyond opinions related to football is not a topic that I think is worth mentioning.
Without me mentioning the few posters who just contribute drivel here, let me just say that you need to post more on BI.
calbear80 said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:calbear80 said:
I am tempted to say I told you so, although, I should not.
Go Bears!
Nice use of a paralipsis!
I have to confess, I had to look up the meaning of "paralipsisi". None of my classes for three engineering degrees at Cal (or the management in Harvard) thought me that word. So, thank you for the education.
Go Coach Wilcox!
Go Bears!
GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
This would be the wrong time and place for me to criticize other schools' fan sites for providing no user edification beyond sports knowledge and opinions.
I agree with you and I am also not going to bring up the shortcomings of other schools' fan sites. The inability of the fans on those sites to provide intellectually stimulating content beyond opinions related to football is not a topic that I think is worth mentioning.
Without me mentioning the few posters who just contribute drivel here, let me just say that you need to post more on BI.
Thanks. That was a good decision by you to not mention the posters that just contribute drivel. I used to post more often. I have visited the board recently to see what was happening with recruiting and the players entering the transfer portal. I am hoping recruiting ends better than where it is right now.
Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:Big C said:GoldenBearofCalifornia said:
It always gives me a laugh when I see people use a paralipsis. I actually learned about it during a class at Cal.
This would be the wrong time and place for me to criticize other schools' fan sites for providing no user edification beyond sports knowledge and opinions.
I agree with you and I am also not going to bring up the shortcomings of other schools' fan sites. The inability of the fans on those sites to provide intellectually stimulating content beyond opinions related to football is not a topic that I think is worth mentioning.
Without me mentioning the few posters who just contribute drivel here, let me just say that you need to post more on BI.
Thanks. That was a good decision by you to not mention the posters that just contribute drivel. I used to post more often. I have visited the board recently to see what was happening with recruiting and the players entering the transfer portal. I am hoping recruiting ends better than where it is right now.
Nobody really contributes drivel here. I made that up as an example to practice my paralipsi.