StillNoStanfurdium said:Eh, not quite half and half. Luckhurst basically got (most of) 4 games before he was replaced (he also kicked 1 XP against WSU which is kind of odd since Mateen kicked 5). So it's 4 games vs. 8 games. Which is sort of double the opportunity.bencgilmore said:crazy how many more XP opportunities Mateen got... the offense nearly doubled his XP opportunities compared to luckhurst in the 1st half.StillNoStanfurdium said:Luckhurst did not make a single field goal over 40 yards this season in his 5 games of kicking. He is overall 33.3% of FGs overall being 3 of 9. He is only a 78% XP kicker going 11 of 14 with one attempt blocked as well.MilleniaBear said:
This was my thought. If Luckhurst has a schollie then the convo with MB might have been something like "we are not taking ML's scholllie to give to you. You have to beat him in camp."
Mateen went 8 for 9 with a long of 43 yards and 27 for 27 on XP.
You'd also expect our offense to improve after the switch to Mendoza although Luckhurt's stats are buoyed by our offense beating up on UNT and doing well against Idaho (9 of 9 XPs with a block in those games but 2 of 5 for FGs).
The more amusing thing is that despite Mateen playing in double the games, that he ended up with the same number of attempts as Luckhurst. So maybe that's the stat to look at to show that our offensive efficiency improved (didn't settle for FGs) or that we totally lost faith in kicking and went for them way less (probably true).
It's not that the offense was 'not settling for field goals' it's that the offense play called around having an unreliable kicker. Prior to UCLA, Cal attempted 5 field goals in 7 games after they gave up on luckhurst.