









Bobodeluxe said:
From the attendance, I assume the same marketing team was active then.
Bobodeluxe said:
From the attendance, I assume the same marketing team was active then.
It's weird that they brought her in from the University of Mississippi to be our Miss Football. It's also weird that the pre game rally included the SMU head coach.JimSox said:
Mary Ann Mobley, "Miss Football" 1957, was crowned Miss America in 1959!
So there's that.
SonomanA1 said:
This is all really interesting and takes us back to another era. The articles include the Black students at Little Rock, Miss Football, and the game being held in honor of the Light Parade. Back to to the team, Joe Kapp was the qb, the picture of the stands showing low attendance, the scores for the season, and the attendance at the games. All good stuff.
I'm curious how you collected all of this? The following season was the last time we went to the Rose Bowl.
Oregon State was the PCC champions that season but didn't go to the Rose Bowl because of the "no-repeat" rule. Cal and USC ended up with 1-9 records. Oregon State had several players from Hawaii including QB Joe Francis and captain Ted Searle.Cal88 said:Bobodeluxe said:
From the attendance, I assume the same marketing team was active then.
Weird numbers, more people for Oregon State than for USC' I guess it was homecoming or some other associated event.
Big Game sold out at Furd's circus maximus, 91K. I think the first non-sold out BGs started appearing in the 90s at the farm.
Bobodeluxe said:
From the attendance, I assume the same marketing team was active then.
bearsandgiants said:
No! This newfangled internet has killed the microfiche!


okaydo said:bearsandgiants said:
No! This newfangled internet has killed the microfiche!
It's frustrating that:
1) The Daily Cal doesn't have its own historic archive.
2) There is like 3 months missing from when I worked there in the 90s.
3) The Daily Cal went online in June 1995. They adapted a Content Management System in 1999. Yet sometime in the early 2000s, the Daily Cal editors decided to delete all the archives. So it's really hard to find online stuff.
4) The Stanford Daily's Archive is far superior. It's easily searchable. You can even search the texts in ads. It's amazing.
Cal88 said:okaydo said:bearsandgiants said:
No! This newfangled internet has killed the microfiche!
It's frustrating that:
1) The Daily Cal doesn't have its own historic archive.
2) There is like 3 months missing from when I worked there in the 90s.
3) The Daily Cal went online in June 1995. They adapted a Content Management System in 1999. Yet sometime in the early 2000s, the Daily Cal editors decided to delete all the archives. So it's really hard to find online stuff.
4) The Stanford Daily's Archive is far superior. It's easily searchable. You can even search the texts in ads. It's amazing.
OCR software allows you to transcribe text from image files into digital text.
IIRC, Cal was touted to be PCC champion that year, but Joe Kapp got injured in the pre-season.RedlessWardrobe said:
a 1-9 W/L record - with the lone win being against USC. Definitely a different era!
okaydo said:Cal88 said:okaydo said:bearsandgiants said:
No! This newfangled internet has killed the microfiche!
It's frustrating that:
1) The Daily Cal doesn't have its own historic archive.
2) There is like 3 months missing from when I worked there in the 90s.
3) The Daily Cal went online in June 1995. They adapted a Content Management System in 1999. Yet sometime in the early 2000s, the Daily Cal editors decided to delete all the archives. So it's really hard to find online stuff.
4) The Stanford Daily's Archive is far superior. It's easily searchable. You can even search the texts in ads. It's amazing.
OCR software allows you to transcribe text from image files into digital text.
Of course, but the point is UC Berkeley's library system doesn't use it.
Beating SC made that a successful season!RedlessWardrobe said:
a 1-9 W/L record - with the lone win being against USC. Definitely a different era!
okaydo said:bearsandgiants said:
No! This newfangled internet has killed the microfiche!
It's frustrating that:
1) The Daily Cal doesn't have its own historic archive.
2) There is like 3 months missing from when I worked there in the 90s.
3) The Daily Cal went online in June 1995. They adapted a Content Management System in 1999. Yet sometime in the early 2000s, the Daily Cal editors decided to delete all the archives. So it's really hard to find online stuff.
4) The Stanford Daily's Archive is far superior. It's easily searchable. You can even search the texts in ads. It's amazing.