alarsuel said:
Admittedly I'm skeptical because Wilcox, but if this was such a home run, why didn't Wilcox hire him this time last year? He's been on the bench for 3 years and nobody else hired him…that doesn't concern anyone else?
this wouldn't be a home run hire, but would it be better than what we have? would it be significantly better?
As long as we have JW, we will not get a home run hire. 1. we couldn't afford it. 2. a home run would have better opportunities elsewhere. 3. IF a home run might be interested in us for whatever reason, the window on such a deal would close quickly and suddenly - we are unable to strike while the iron is hot...not with these bozo's.