OT: SEC suspends long-time referee after Georgia-Auburn officiating controversy

588 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by concordtom
sidobagga
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/46702090/sec-suspends-referee-wake-georgia-auburn-game

Two controversial calls cited in the ESPN article, as well as in other media coverage.


" With the Tigers leading 10-0 late in the first half, Auburn quarterback Jackson Arnold tried to score on a sneak on third-and-goal from the Georgia 1.

As Arnold reached for the end zone, Georgia linebacker Raylen Wilson punched the football out of Arnold's arm. Bulldogs safety Kyron Jones recovered the ball at the 1, and officials ruled that Arnold fumbled before reaching the goal line.

After a lengthy delay, replay officials upheld the on-field ruling, giving the Bulldogs possession."

and

" With the Bulldogs leading 13-10 in the fourth quarter, Georgia coach Kirby Smart ran toward the side judge and appeared to call timeout with his hands. The official stopped the clock, and Smart argued that he was only telling the official that Auburn players were clapping their hands to mimic Georgia's signals, which should warrant a penalty.

After a brief discussion, Georgia wasn't charged a timeout, and the play clock was reset to 25 seconds."


It seems like by halftime, the optics were clearly such that Ken Williamson's miscalls were favoring Georgia.

"As Williamson made his way to the locker room, he was confronted by Auburn athletic director John Cohen and football coach Hugh Freeze. 'I have no clue how that doesn't break the plane, no clue,' Freeze told sideline reporter Molly McGrath at halftime. 'We're due a break, maybe, one of these damn times.'"

Seems like certain conferences are much more on top of this kinda thing than others.

Also, seems that a coach's in-game reaction can materially shape the narrative and lead to more pressure on conference big-brass to take action.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched that game starting towards the end of the first half, the officiating was a whole big mess and even though Georgia shut down Auburn in the 2nd half and was in control, it was still a bit strange to watch a game where the outcome while in question was not the main focus
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're giving me the painful reminder of Cal at Notre Dame a few years back.

We were surprisingly on top good early when ND attempted a long field goal, which they would miss.

However, a ref called a BS offsides on Cal (replays confirmed there most definitely was not) and ND took the first down and scored a TD.

I did research in who that ref was. He had been paid a sum to come ref their Spring intrasquad contest.

Total conflict of interest.
I have no doubt that said ref was glad to receive the undisclosed amount, and felt some measure of effort be given to let other future employers know he was available for hire for them in the future, too.

It's a corrupt system.

And now we have to worry about the gambling angle, too!

It's not the swimming pool I would choose to play in!
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.