So Many Firings, So Few Coaches

3,432 Views | 60 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by SoFlaBear
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ac_green33 said:


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.


LOL!! That's funny as hell. I can't imagine any P4 school hiring him as head coach. His resume as a head coach is a complete disaster.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GA 's last season…
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Rushinbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

ac_green33 said:


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.


LOL!! That's funny as hell. I can't imagine any P4 school hiring him as head coach. His resume as a head coach is a complete disaster.

I imagine that he interviews well. "Can you imagine putting together a winning team with their academic standards and reputation? We had so many kids who wanted to come, but couldn't make it in or didn't want to grind out the grades." "So, why did you stay so long?" "I never give up."
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!



Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?


Sad, not fascinating. It shows Cal's football reputation nationally.
DoubtfulBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!



Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?


Sad, not fascinating. It shows Cal's football reputation nationally.

Okay, but when people are touting coaches from smaller G5 or FCS schools who could move on to a bigger job, they typically pick one with a winning record. So they acknowledge that the coach has more challenges and fewer resources there but they still want to see a winner. With Wilcox, meanwhile, sub-mediocrity at a P4 school is fine? I don't get it.
bipolarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilcox has run a clean program free of messy, embarrassing incidents in an academic institution. A program with PR problems might really need someone like him.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

Looking at Wilcox's record would require actually doing a little research, wouldn't it? The important thing these days in the media is to generate content that gets clicks, regardless of accuracy. Whoever added Wilcox to their list did that so it appeared they considered the entire country. Then, of course, the next media pundit uses this misinformation as a "source" and on it goes.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have met the enemy, and he is us.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.


Frankly, the perception, which is VERY REAL, is driven mainly from our last two coaches. No need to go back past them. I was just answering a question.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

calumnus said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.


Frankly, the perception, which is VERY REAL, is driven mainly from our last two coaches. No need to go back past them. I was just answering a question.

I will accept the point for Dykes. Tedford bounced around with health issues before finally landing at a lower-level school in Fresno and doing well (before health issues pushed him out again). I don't think you can put that on Cal.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

calumnus said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.


Frankly, the perception, which is VERY REAL, is driven mainly from our last two coaches. No need to go back past them. I was just answering a question.

I will accept the point for Dykes. Tedford bounced around with health issues before finally landing at a lower-level school in Fresno and doing well (before health issues pushed him out again). I don't think you can put that on Cal.


There is a VERY REAL perception that Cal wouldn't have flamed out like he did if he was at a blue blood -- that he was an exceptional coach who got swallowed by Cal. For example, Tedford wouldn't have had to deal with professors failing players at other places.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

calumnus said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.


Frankly, the perception, which is VERY REAL, is driven mainly from our last two coaches. No need to go back past them. I was just answering a question.

I will accept the point for Dykes. Tedford bounced around with health issues before finally landing at a lower-level school in Fresno and doing well (before health issues pushed him out again). I don't think you can put that on Cal.


There is a VERY REAL perception that Cal wouldn't have flamed out like he did if he was at a blue blood -- that he was an exceptional coach who got swallowed by Cal. For example, Tedford wouldn't have had to deal with professors failing players at other places.

That is probably true, but the fact that he flamed out due to health issues at his next two professional stops suggests that there was something else at play.

Also, none of this explains to me why Wilcox is included in a list of quality candidates with a losing record. Okay, I get that Cal's reputation sucks. Don't you have to still perform decently to be considered a hot candidate for other jobs?
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Tedford wouldn't have had to deal with professors failing players at other places."

Fire all the professors.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

calumnus said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

DoubtfulBear said:

sycasey said:

ac_green33 said:

Here is a national media perspective from another article in The Athletic, about the coaching carousel. And PLEASE DONT SHOOT THE MESSENGER, im just sharing!

Quote:

Eight Power 4 jobs are open right now. Seven are up for grabs because of in-season firings, and one will be because Stanford is doing the Frank Reich thing for a year. More are coming, perhaps some or all of these five among them: Auburn, Kentucky, Florida State, Michigan State and Wisconsin.


Quote:

Sitting Power 4 head coaches who may be enticed to move: Kiffin, Arizona State's Kenny Dillingham, Cal's Justin Wilcox, Cincinnati's Scott Satterfield, Duke's Manny Diaz, Georgia Tech's Brent Key, Houston's Willie Fritz, Iowa State's Matt Campbell, Louisville's Jeff Brohm, Missouri's Eli Drinkwitz, Nebraska's Matt Rhule, SMU's Rhett Lashlee, Vanderbilt's Clark Lea, Washington's Jedd Fisch


It's interesting to see that national media not only doesn't see Wilcox as a firing candidate, but also thinks that he is in the caliber of coach that can leave on his own volition to another P4 job.

I got absolutely killed in another thread for suggesting that Wilcox still has a good reputation in the broader CFB world (and he shouldn't!) but I think it's the case.

It's so fascinating to me that Wilcox has managed to maintain some of this reputation within national media. Do they not look at the records? That he hasn't had a winning season in 5 years? I know there's an idea (somewhat deserved) that Cal makes it hard to win, but if there is supposed to be market for a coach shouldn't he have to actually show he's a winner?

They could care less about our record. They see a guy that has been a P4 HC for 9 seasons and figure that he is a good enough candidate for some other mediocre P4 program


Nah, it has a lot to do with the past success of our coaches after they left Cal.

Is there anyone besides Sonny Dykes you could say this for?


Tedford. Snyder. Mooch. Holmoe as an AD. Dykes of course. It isn't like there are many recent coaches to choose from. 5 of our last 6 did better elsewhere. I am counting Mooch solely because he was hired to be an NFL head coach just for going 6-6 at Cal.

There's no reason to count Mooch, that guy had no track record at Cal. Holmoe? Come on. Apples to oranges.

How was Tedford "better" after leaving Cal? Is winning at Fresno State actually better?

Mooch went 6-6 at Cal and then got hired to coach the 49ers. Tedford, after 15-22 his last three seasons at Cal, took a 1-11 Fresno St. team to 10-4 and then 12-2. Holmoe's time at BYU has been an astounding success in football and other sports. Yup, 5 of the last 6 Cal football coaches kicked butt at their next stop and the last two were fired. The last fired coach went on to be College Football's Coach of the Year!!!!!

Going further back there is Mike White and Marv Levy.

Then there is Gilby. Watching him destroy UW was glorious.


Frankly, the perception, which is VERY REAL, is driven mainly from our last two coaches. No need to go back past them. I was just answering a question.

I will accept the point for Dykes. Tedford bounced around with health issues before finally landing at a lower-level school in Fresno and doing well (before health issues pushed him out again). I don't think you can put that on Cal.


There is a VERY REAL perception that Cal wouldn't have flamed out like he did if he was at a blue blood -- that he was an exceptional coach who got swallowed by Cal. For example, Tedford wouldn't have had to deal with professors failing players at other places.

I think you mean that Tedford wouldn't have flamed out like he did if he was at a more athletic "blue blood" school. I disagree. Tedford got into health trouble at Fresno State. He works himself into a heart attack. And who cares about academics?

The truth is that Wilcox is not on a list to move because the perception that Cal doesn't care about athletics is true. How else would we tolerate 8 seasons of mediocrity? There's the perception on this board. And then there's the reality of articles like the Athletic or other media that write, "well, they've tolerated Wilcox for 8 years. Standards are low. Why would he be on the hot seat?" People do not take us as seriously as we take us. And, honestly, this is probably why we've heard not a peep from Rivera or Lyons.
jy1988
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In retrospect, Snyder was the best Cal coach in the last 50 years. A good fit for Cal, and a good coach. We can thank that A**hat Bockrath for messing up what probably would have been a great ten-year run.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jy1988 said:

In retrospect, Snyder was the best Cal coach in the last 50 years. A good fit for Cal, and a good coach. We can thank that A**hat Bockrath for messing up what probably would have been a great ten-year run.

He was good once he hired Mooch as OC. We should have tried to keep that staff but even if Snyder left I am certain we would have been fine, maybe even better off, if we had promoted Mooch to HC. I think with his charisma and energy he was best suited as a college coach and recruiter. We would have retained much of the great class we had coming in. Instead Bockrath hired Gilby….
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jy1988 said:

In retrospect, Snyder was the best Cal coach in the last 50 years. A good fit for Cal, and a good coach. We can thank that A**hat Bockrath for messing up what probably would have been a great ten-year run.


Tien made that call.
Bockrath was following orders. Tien felt Cal could get anyone to coach, and he was never going to pay Bruce $350k. Another example of a Cal chancellor making a boneheaded decision.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alkiadt said:

jy1988 said:

In retrospect, Snyder was the best Cal coach in the last 50 years. A good fit for Cal, and a good coach. We can thank that A**hat Bockrath for messing up what probably would have been a great ten-year run.


Tien made that call.
Bockrath was following orders. Tien felt Cal could get anyone to coach, and he was never going to pay Bruce $350k. Another example of a Cal chancellor making a boneheaded decision.


But Bockrath was the one who chose Gilby over Mooch, you can't blame Tien for that. I honestly think Mooch would have been great and would have just built on what we had in 1991.

Gilby actually did OK at first with all the talent he inherited until he tanked. Mooch took over from that much lower level and we would have been pretty good in 1996 if he hadn't hired Holmoe as DC (at Walsh's insistence) delivering one of the worst defenses in the country. Then when the Niners hired Mooch (also with Walsh's input?) we made Holmoe HC (also at Walsh's recommendation).
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alkiadt said:

jy1988 said:

In retrospect, Snyder was the best Cal coach in the last 50 years. A good fit for Cal, and a good coach. We can thank that A**hat Bockrath for messing up what probably would have been a great ten-year run.


Tien made that call.
Bockrath was following orders. Tien felt Cal could get anyone to coach, and he was never going to pay Bruce $350k. Another example of a Cal chancellor making a boneheaded decision.



It wasn't just the salary. Snyder had fully justified concerns about the sorry state of training facilities. That would have been more money the administration would have to spend.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.