Cal visits the Cardinals (Not the Big Game) Game Thread

35,082 Views | 510 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by oskihottie
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

After 9 games, our defense is still awful.


It's not ideal, but we are giving as good as we are getting so far. I'd like to hold them to a FGA here.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2:34 and 3 timeouts. We need to take advantage.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TandemBear said:

oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.

That's a poor take. There is a game thread here and a game thread over there. The game thread over there is much more active. Perhaps people here are just sick of repetitive whining and moaning.
OsoDorado
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Need to score on this drive!
Joegeo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Major props to the players. Easily a game they could have mailed in but they are still giving their all against a tough opponent.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear said:

Golden One said:

After 9 games, our defense is still awful.


It's not ideal, but we are giving as good as we are getting so far. I'd like to hold them to a FGA here.

We are keeping it close and they are still passing, which plays to our defensive strength. Hopefully they don't figure out we can't stop the run.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

TandemBear said:

oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.

That's a poor take. There is a game thread here and a game thread over there. The game thread over there is much more active. Perhaps people here are just sick of repetitive whining and moaning.

Thought I'd check in and report that we are at page 3 of the Game Thread. Less than 2 minutes left in the 1st half. Did we ever establish an over/under?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roll on you bears!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a throw!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Announcer: Sagapolutele not very mobile What is he? Mobile enough?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And as I said, game threads here have a long history of being actively used, and extending into multiple, multiple pages. Hardly "a poor take." My statement is objective fact.

I've never seen anyone admonished for being in the "wrong forum" for a game thread before (wrong and "boothed" threads, yes). First time for me. Hilarious that you feel the need to shame the folks in the free forum.
Again, good way to drive more fans away.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JKS and DeJesus need to get a room - they have incredible chemistry!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Grizzell just slipped….
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just wasted a TO.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice YAC!!!!
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.


6 total pages for an evening night game is dog ***** Sorry.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Illegal procedure penalty seems likely
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

TandemBear said:

oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.

That's a poor take. There is a game thread here and a game thread over there. The game thread over there is much more active. Perhaps people here are just sick of repetitive whining and moaning.


The poor take is that 4 pages on insiders is an active thread. Like, holy ***** Are you mental? People who pay money for this site can't be ****ed to talk about Cal football anymore.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes!
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Huge TD at the end of the half!!!! Gonna be a fun halftime locker room.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice TD Bears!

(But that was almost a disaster.)
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

oski003 said:

TandemBear said:

oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.

That's a poor take. There is a game thread here and a game thread over there. The game thread over there is much more active. Perhaps people here are just sick of repetitive whining and moaning.


The poor take is that 4 pages on insiders is an active thread. Like, holy ***** Are you mental? People who pay money for this site can't be ****ed to talk about Cal football anymore.

It is more than 6.

TD BEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PHEW
Grrrrah76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a bonaza! TD Bears!!!
Joegeo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Credit to the players and coaching staff with all the adversity they are facing playing their asses off
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good first half for the Bears. Now, let's see more in the second half.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cal currently covering by 22.5 points.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We could have been up by 11 at the half! Still a decent half.
BrightBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watch Justin fold like a cheap lawn chair in the 2nd half. I've seen this movie too many times
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BrightBear said:

Watch Justin fold like a cheap lawn chair in the 2nd half. I've seen this movie too many times


a little too early for turtle mode, but yeah…
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

oski003 said:

TandemBear said:

oski003 said:

LunchTime said:

SoFlaBear said:

LunchTime said:

Grrrrah76 said:

Seems like most of this board is rooting for Cal to lose.


Seems like most of this board isn't even paying attention at all, TBH.

I would rather fans were engaged enough to want Cal to lose.

Ron has come in and turned fans away.


I want the Bears to win. Full stop.

I do realize that if we get to a bowl, it increases the chances that Wilcox is retained, but we should keep winning and cross that bridge later.


Cool. Me too. I would rather Cal fans cared enough to still complain. This thread is 2 pages and it's almost half time.

That is a problem. Full stop.

Less than half the length of the Insider Game Thread. You are just in the wrong spot.

Nope. Growls game threads have been very long here for decades.

Why make game threads some exclusive thing? When you're losing fans in droves, game threads shouldn't be behind a paywall.

That's a poor take. There is a game thread here and a game thread over there. The game thread over there is much more active. Perhaps people here are just sick of repetitive whining and moaning.


The poor take is that 4 pages on insiders is an active thread. Like, holy ***** Are you mental? People who pay money for this site can't be ****ed to talk about Cal football anymore.

It is more than 6.

TD BEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Go back there
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

We could have been up by 11 at the half! Still a decent half.


The ACC was so there for the taking. Louisville is the best team on our schedule and we are beating them on the road.
calgldnbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice first half overall

Now let's put two good halves together Bears!!!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.