HateRed said:
It's almost like they are getting paid to lose this game.
That would at least lead me to believe they were intelligent
HateRed said:
It's almost like they are getting paid to lose this game.
TedfordTheGreat said:philly1121 said:sycasey said:philly1121 said:sycasey said:
Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.
Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.
I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.
The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol
what donors does ucla have?
yet they act with more gumption
CalGrad95 said:
Going to be the worst loss of the Wilcox era. Wrap your brain around that
SoFlaBear said:
You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.
Bearly Clad said:
If there was ever a case for a mid game coaching change this is it. They had two weeks to prep for this game and are this disorganized and unfocused. And all the damn penalties . . .
That's all (lack of) coaching right there
sycasey said:
Stanford guy was just unblocked on that 3rd down. 71 blocked nobody.
philly1121 said:sycasey said:philly1121 said:sycasey said:
Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.
Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.
I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.
The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol
DaveT said:Nofado said:
We are going to lose JKS due to this game
We'll know for sure if he has the flu next week against SMU . . .
sonofabear51 said:
Cal is LETTING this happen. There is no reason they should lose this game. F'ing awful.
Strykur said:Bearly Clad said:
If there was ever a case for a mid game coaching change this is it. They had two weeks to prep for this game and are this disorganized and unfocused. And all the damn penalties . . .
That's all (lack of) coaching right there
Only the defense came to play tonight and they are starting to pack it in with all the tomfoolery happening on offense
sycasey said:
Don't even accept a bowl game invite. It's not deserved.
philly1121 said:sycasey said:philly1121 said:sycasey said:
Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.
Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.
I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.
The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol
SoFlaBear said:
You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.