THE Big Game Thread

39,347 Views | 599 Replies | Last: 4 mo ago by PAC-10-BEAR
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HateRed said:

It's almost like they are getting paid to lose this game.


That would at least lead me to believe they were intelligent
GrizzledBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comical at this point, dgaf. Keeping my blood pressure down, they don't care so why should I
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need a center and a big running back, that's for damn sure.
BEAST MODE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only bright spot is let them score quickly so we can get back in the game. Need a score now. Fast
BearChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welp, I guess Wilcox won't get poached by another school, to oski003's relief. Take that, you negabears!
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TedfordTheGreat said:

philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.

Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.

I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.

The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol


what donors does ucla have?
yet they act with more gumption

What does UCLA have to do with this? And they have Casey Wasserman pal. Who's our billionaire donor?
BEAST MODE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ok 1st and 15 coming!
CalGrad95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Going to be the worst loss of the Wilcox era. Wrap your brain around that
SouthKBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To be fair, we all knew dummy was going to blow this game after a bye week. I didn't really expect anything less. Interviewer "Justin, tough loss. Any thoughts on the game?"

Dummy "penalties, bad discipline. Mental errors. Can't win against a good team like them With so many penalties."


A good team????? Stanford???? The 3-7 team????
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.
SouthKBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chews it bowl, Arizona game, Colorado game. Florida state game. Shall I go on??
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalGrad95 said:

Going to be the worst loss of the Wilcox era. Wrap your brain around that

Furd has FBS wins, they are lousy but not that lousy
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was told bye week is such an advantage.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear said:

You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.

Holmoe had to compete against a PAC-10 that was pretty stacked in the late 90s/early 2000s, we can't get a winning conference record against ACC also-rans
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our O Line Sux.
Bearly Clad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there was ever a case for a mid game coaching change this is it. They had two weeks to prep for this game and are this disorganized and unfocused. And all the damn penalties . . .

That's all (lack of) coaching right there
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stanford guy was just unblocked on that 3rd down. 71 blocked nobody.
BEAST MODE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was so obvious they were going to pin their ears back and blitz. They should have known it
oskithepimp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We haven't gotten a first down since halfway through the 2nd quarter. We have 2.5x penalty yards than rushing yards. And we're gaining on having more penalty yards than passing yards. Oh and we fumbled 3 times. When is enough enough?
westcoastdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilcox has more issues with the buttons controlling his headset than any coach I have seen. He is always fumbling with the controls on his side. Anyone else notice this?
DaveT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our OL LOLOLOL
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearly Clad said:

If there was ever a case for a mid game coaching change this is it. They had two weeks to prep for this game and are this disorganized and unfocused. And all the damn penalties . . .

That's all (lack of) coaching right there

Only the defense came to play tonight and they are starting to pack it in with all the tomfoolery happening on offense
3146gabby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
does anyone actually want Cal - if it were possible which it is not - to win this game.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Stanford guy was just unblocked on that 3rd down. 71 blocked nobody.


Shockey
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal is LETTING this happen. There is no reason they should lose this game. F'ing awful.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.

Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.

I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.

The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol

I never said there are no whale donors or potential donors. There are insiders who would know better. What I've said is we collectively have the wealthiest alumni base in D1 football and we need to find a way to make use of that fact. Agree with everything else.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaveT said:

Nofado said:

We are going to lose JKS due to this game

We'll know for sure if he has the flu next week against SMU . . .



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't even accept a bowl game invite. It's not deserved.
m2bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

Cal is LETTING this happen. There is no reason they should lose this game. F'ing awful.



Maybe this is your first game in a long long time.

There is a reason Cal should be losing this game.

It's name is Wilcox.

Sorry you had to find out this way.
01Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

Bearly Clad said:

If there was ever a case for a mid game coaching change this is it. They had two weeks to prep for this game and are this disorganized and unfocused. And all the damn penalties . . .

That's all (lack of) coaching right there

Only the defense came to play tonight and they are starting to pack it in with all the tomfoolery happening on offense

The ST managed to block a punt. They've also been perfect on FGs and PATs tonight.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Don't even accept a bowl game invite. It's not deserved.

There won't be a need to without a coach
Bear_Territory
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just left embarrassing
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

philly1121 said:

sycasey said:

Well, at least this will put the nail in Wilcox's coffin.

Really? Wilcox is the Rasputin of college football.

I don't think the donors will stand for a loss to Furd, especially THIS Furd team, and especially while playing a sloppy game like this. He's gotta be gone.

The donors? Who are they and how much do they give? I mean, if Calumnus is correct, there are no "whale donors". And if they've tolerated this for 8+ years, whats one loss to Stanfurd? I mean, I agree with you but, there's no one game that's gonna decide this. Especially since Rivera is on the sidelines "observing" Wilcox in action. Thank God he's there. lol

It's pretty obvious that the donor base was getting frustrated, given that Knowlton was pushed out and Rivera given full control after a revolt by the donors. So yes, we have donors with influence.

It's not just one game. Are you familiar with what the term "nail in the coffin" means? How about "last straw"? Heard of that one? That's what I'm talking about here.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear said:

You've clearly blacked out the Holmoe years, but it's the worst I've seen in at least a decade.

When we faced Top 10 schedules, used to beat USC and UCLA and sent great players to the NFL?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.